Re: [digitalradio] Re: Continuing evolution of HF Ham radio communications:

2008-01-15 Thread bruce mallon
MY POINT IS .. You ( DIGITAL USERS ) call CW ( ANALOG ) stone age .. You call those who enjoy SSB, AM, FM or just talking on the radio the reason ham radio is dieing . YOU ARE OUR SALVATION ! You by your digital modes will save the bands from the invading army of other users ...

[digitalradio] Re: Continuing evolution of HF Ham radio communications:

2008-01-15 Thread kh6ty
Flame on this idea if you wish, however robust live-chat sound-card modes, ARQ messaging modes, and Automatic Link Establishment (ALE) modes will all gain increased popularity, acceptance, and adoption because of their more efficient and reliable communication capabilities as compared to manual

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Continuing evolution of HF Ham radio communications:

2008-01-15 Thread Roger J. Buffington
kh6ty wrote: 97.113 Prohibited transmissions. (a) No amateur station shall transmit: (5) Communications, on a regular basis, which could reasonably be furnished alternatively through other radio services. Excellent point. The above regulation, interpreted reasonably, would outlaw 99.9%

[digitalradio] Digitalradio Group

2008-01-15 Thread dl8le
Per definition the DIGITALRADIO GROUP is A meeting place for discussion of amateur radio digital modes, applications, software, hardware, equipment, and on the air activity. The ongoing discussion about legal or formal topics since a couple of weeks with constant repeating of all the old

Re: [digitalradio] Re: multipsk

2008-01-15 Thread Patrick Lindecker
Hello Lynn, As said by Bill, you installed the program from the desktop (which must not be done): Multipsk considered the desktop as the installation folder and installed all the files in this folder. To install Multipsk, read _READ_ME.TXT in the Multipsk package first. Hereafter is the

[digitalradio] Re: Digitalradio Group

2008-01-15 Thread Howard Brown
Yes, we need to have a place where the discussions of FCC rules are appropriate. Does anyone know of such a group on Yahoo?? Andy, would you consider creating such a group?? Howard K5HB --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, dl8le [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Per definition the DIGITALRADIO

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Digitalradio Group

2008-01-15 Thread Rodney
There used to be a group called, FCC Sucks!, or something like that, but I haven't heard anything from it in a long time. Howard Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, we need to have a place where the discussions of FCC rules are appropriate. Does anyone know of

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Digitalradio Group

2008-01-15 Thread Rodney
Just did a Group search and it's there. It's called, FCCSUCKS, but there's only ONE message on it and who knows if it even has a moderator!. I agree, someone (NOT me) needs to start an FCC Rules discussion group! Rod KC7CJO Howard Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Digitalradio Group

2008-01-15 Thread Chris Jewell
Rodney writes: Just did a Group search and it's there. It's called, FCCSUCKS, but there's only ONE message on it and who knows if it even has a moderator!. I agree, someone (NOT me) needs to start an FCC Rules discussion group! Rod KC7CJO It appears that the digipol Y!-group was

[digitalradio] Re: Digitalradio Group

2008-01-15 Thread jgorman01
I know some of the comments and arguments here are boring at times. However, they do serve a purpose in refining positions and educating folks about the rules. Let's face it, with the number of hams the US has we are an 800 pound gorilla in amateur radio. Maybe not the only one, but certainly

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Digitalradio Group

2008-01-15 Thread Andrew O'Brien
Juergen is correct. I will end this thread at 1200 Z, 16/01/08 Digipol can be be used to continue the thresd. On Jan 15, 2008 9:16 PM, jgorman01 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know some of the comments and arguments here are boring at times. However, they do serve a purpose in refining

[digitalradio] Digital mode policy group

2008-01-15 Thread Andrew O'Brien
The sister group, digipolicy is at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digipolicy/

[digitalradio] re:multipsk

2008-01-15 Thread n0alo
Thanks Bill - that is what was happening. Was missing one step. Up and running now. Many thanks to everyone who responded. Lynn Hello Lynn, That is not a normal install. Perhaps you inadvertently unzipped the files into your desk top? You might also ask on the dedicated Multipsk group - alot

Re: [digitalradio] Digitalradio Group

2008-01-15 Thread dg6ygd
100 % agree This is no place to discuss failure of fcc or to fight each other. If you have problems with bandwidth or unattended stations please discuss with fcc for solutions - not with other hams which everytime have different opinions. Read and accept the facts given by your authority,

Re: [digitalradio] Digitalradio Group

2008-01-15 Thread Jim Dear
Thank you, Juregen. Jim W5LOG dl8le [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Per definition the DIGITALRADIO GROUP is A meeting place for discussion of amateur radio digital modes, applications, software, hardware, equipment, and on the air activity. The ongoing

Re: [digitalradio] Digitalradio Group

2008-01-15 Thread o.
Thank you Juergen, you are of course right. 73 Omar YK1AO - Original Message - From: dl8le To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 6:11 PM Subject: [digitalradio] Digitalradio Group Per definition the DIGITALRADIO GROUP is A meeting