MY POINT IS ..
You ( DIGITAL USERS ) call CW ( ANALOG ) stone age
..
You call those who enjoy SSB, AM, FM or just talking
on the radio the reason ham radio is dieing .
YOU ARE OUR SALVATION ! You by your digital modes will
save the bands from the invading army of other users
...
Flame on this idea if you wish, however robust live-chat sound-card
modes,
ARQ messaging modes, and Automatic Link Establishment (ALE)
modes will all gain increased popularity, acceptance, and adoption because
of their more efficient and reliable communication capabilities as compared
to
manual
kh6ty wrote:
97.113 Prohibited transmissions. (a) No amateur station shall
transmit:
(5) Communications, on a regular basis, which could reasonably be
furnished alternatively through other radio services.
Excellent point. The above regulation, interpreted reasonably, would
outlaw 99.9%
Per definition the
DIGITALRADIO GROUP
is
A meeting place for discussion of amateur radio digital modes,
applications, software, hardware, equipment, and on the air
activity.
The ongoing discussion about legal or formal topics since a couple
of weeks with constant repeating of all the old
Hello Lynn,
As said by Bill, you installed the program from the desktop (which must not be
done): Multipsk considered the desktop as the installation folder and installed
all the files in this folder.
To install Multipsk, read _READ_ME.TXT in the Multipsk package first.
Hereafter is the
Yes, we need to have a place where the discussions of FCC rules are
appropriate. Does anyone know of such a group on Yahoo??
Andy, would you consider creating such a group??
Howard K5HB
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, dl8le [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Per definition the
DIGITALRADIO
There used to be a group called, FCC Sucks!, or something like that, but I
haven't heard anything from it in a long time.
Howard Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, we
need to have a place where the discussions of FCC rules are
appropriate. Does anyone know of
Just did a Group search and it's there. It's called, FCCSUCKS, but there's
only ONE message on it and who knows if it even has a moderator!.
I agree, someone (NOT me) needs to start an FCC Rules discussion group!
Rod
KC7CJO
Howard Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rodney writes:
Just did a Group search and it's there. It's called, FCCSUCKS, but
there's only ONE message on it and who knows if it even has a moderator!.
I agree, someone (NOT me) needs to start an FCC Rules discussion group!
Rod
KC7CJO
It appears that the digipol Y!-group was
I know some of the comments and arguments here are boring at times.
However, they do serve a purpose in refining positions and educating
folks about the rules.
Let's face it, with the number of hams the US has we are an 800 pound
gorilla in amateur radio. Maybe not the only one, but certainly
Juergen is correct. I will end this thread at 1200 Z, 16/01/08
Digipol can be be used to continue the thresd.
On Jan 15, 2008 9:16 PM, jgorman01 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know some of the comments and arguments here are boring at times.
However, they do serve a purpose in refining
The sister group, digipolicy is at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digipolicy/
Thanks Bill - that is what was happening. Was missing one step.
Up and running now.
Many thanks to everyone who responded.
Lynn
Hello Lynn,
That is not a normal install. Perhaps you inadvertently unzipped the
files into your desk top? You might also ask on the dedicated Multipsk
group - alot
100 % agree
This is no place to discuss failure of fcc or to fight each other.
If you have problems with bandwidth or unattended stations please discuss
with fcc for solutions - not with other hams which everytime have
different opinions. Read and accept the facts given by your authority,
Thank you, Juregen.
Jim
W5LOG
dl8le [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Per definition
the
DIGITALRADIO GROUP
is
A meeting place for discussion of amateur radio digital modes,
applications, software, hardware, equipment, and on the air
activity.
The ongoing
Thank you Juergen, you are of course right.
73
Omar YK1AO
- Original Message -
From: dl8le
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 6:11 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Digitalradio Group
Per definition the
DIGITALRADIO GROUP
is
A meeting
16 matches
Mail list logo