Rud Merriam K5RUD
Bluntly, you are ignoring the reality of trends
in computer hardware.
Hi Rud,
There's no problem with the computer hardware,
simply a problem with the commercially made
interface between the computer and the radio.
Any interface that deletes part of the transmit
The article mentions WinLink developer Rick Muething.
Rick Muething installed the WinLink HF and VHF stuff in our area.
That was when we first noticed the new packet node with no callsign and the
alias OFF. - Illegal as you can get.
The OFF node cleverly screws up TheNet nodes so that the
Well stated, Bonnie.
73 de Stro
KO4FR
- Original Message -
From: expeditionradio
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 12:17 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Signalink No Good for ARQ Modes
IMHO, it is ridiculous to suggest that
the protocol
Bonnie,
Rud Merriam k5rud wrote:
Or the protocol implementers need to recognize
the need to generate a tone to trigger the VOX.
This would be analogous to the delay they provide for
transmitter keying.
Bonnie wrote:
IMHO, it is ridiculous to suggest that
the protocol implementers should
Hello Rud,
In asynchronous ARQ mode, in all cases, it is necessary to bit synchronize
the receiver as the receiver does not know when teh next frame is going to
be transmitted (reversely, in synchronous ARQ mode this is not necessary as
the RX knows exactly the time of the reception of the
What is the connection to the Winmor protocol here??
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
Charles Brabham wrote:
The article mentions WinLink developer Rick Muething.
Rick Muething installed the WinLink HF and VHF stuff in our area.
That was when we first noticed the new packet node with no callsign
I agree with Skip on this Bonnie, the Signalink interface is a very good
digital interface and to write it off as a P.O.S is misinformed,
disingenuous, just plain wrong and potentially damaging to a small US
ham radio oriented company who manufacture quality products.
Just to reiterate I have
Just to add my two cents.
I do have a SL-1 that is used only for MT63 and HELL.
Having said that I have found no problem with it. Of
course they are not ARQ modes. I do use ARQ modes
a lot but also have the hardware to operate it.
John, W0JAB
I will consider this topic completed at this time. The comment
summary is that the product is good hardware device for most common
digital modes but may not work with ALE and AMTOR . Please refrain
from any personal attacks associated with this thread.
Andy K3UK
Owner.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008
Steinar, I do not know the individuals concerned, they are probably
good hams. The undercurrent however, is the view of some, that the
SCAMP, WINLINK, AIRMAIL , TELPAC, system is not as open as radio
amateurs usually desire. When when one contrasts the openness of
PSK31, MMTTY, NEMBS, MT63,
Andy,
I may have misread something in the original notice. That being the
proceedings of TAPR DC will be offered for sale by ARRL. I don't remember a
mention that the software would be for sale.
Been completely wrong before (and often).
Don
KA5DON
Steinar, I do not know the
Hello all,
For the curious the winlink web site has a snapshot of the program running:
http://www.winlink.org/node/341
There are other tidbits that have surfaced in the winlink forums
Very little hard data has surfaced, just some tidbits in the winlink
forums. Based on past comments,
12 matches
Mail list logo
