--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, W2XJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Demetre SV1UY wrote:
First of all not many can afford a satellite phone, which is also not
amateur radio. A satellite phone plus connection fees are far more
expensive than a PACTOR MODEM. Second many do not even have the
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
QRM from PMBOs and other deaf robots spoils the enjoyment of
amateur radio for many operators Demetre. That's why so many are
willing to do practically anything to make WinLink stop generating
QRM. Anti-radiation
+++ more AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Demetre SV1UY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
QRM from PMBOs and other deaf robots spoils the enjoyment of
amateur radio for many operators Demetre. That's why so many are
willing to do practically anything to make WinLink stop
IMNSHO malicious interference, interference that prevents or
interrupts a QSO on a frequency from any source is ILLEGAL by the
existing rules. The fact that this rule is not being enforced should
generate information to the FCC on these interferences and requests
to the same agency to clean
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+++ more AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Demetre SV1UY sv1uy@
wrote:
QRM from PMBOs and other deaf robots spoils the enjoyment of
amateur radio for many operators Demetre. That's why
AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Les Warriner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMNSHO malicious interference, interference that prevents or
interrupts a QSO on a frequency from any source is ILLEGAL by the
existing rules. The fact that this rule is not being enforced should
.
What's your grid square?
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Demetre SV1UY
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 5:42 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Questions on digital
Oh,
I nearly forgot to ask you Dave, what's the matter with you and
PACTOR-3? Has uncle Steve been bad to you recently? I can help you know!!!
73 de Demetre de SV1UY
P.S. Please smile, this is only a hobby OM. MERRY CHRISTMAS and a
HAPPY NEW YEAR to all.
At 04:23 PM 12/27/2007, you wrote:
Again in MO, any station operating unattended and generating RF interfering
signals should NEVER be allowed on Amateur frequencies.
It's not ! under FCC rules
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave AA6YQ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You caught me, Demetre. I did rent an F-16 last weekend and got all
the way
to Winlink Planetary Headquarters before realizing that the HARMs
Hertz gave
me were tuned to 7.105 GHz instead of 7.105 MHz as requested. So I
At 04:37 PM 12/27/2007, you wrote:
Unless you're willing to purchase an SCS TNC, you will not be able
to know who or what QRM'd you. A requirement that all unattended
stations identify in CW at least once within each 5-minute period of
activity would eliminate this problem.
Dave I'm not to
If you'd actually read any of my posts, Demetre, you'd know that my
focus is on automatic stations without busy detectors -- no matter
what protocol they are using. In fact I recently posted here that
banning Pactor III because a bunch of inconsiderate operators use it
in PMBOs would be like
I have never heard a WinLink PMBO identify in CW.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker, WØJAB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
At 04:37 PM 12/27/2007, you wrote:
Unless you're willing to purchase an SCS TNC, you will not be
able
to know who or what QRM'd you.
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 8:26 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Questions on digital opposition, QRM on PACTOR
PMBOS now from DAVE, Congrats
I have never heard a WinLink PMBO identify in CW.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Dave Bernstein wrote:
I have never heard a WinLink PMBO identify in CW.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
That is because they never do. The SCS TNCs can be set to ID in CW, but
in practice no one ever does.
de Roger W6VZV
Struebel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 7:36:45 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Questions on digital opposition, QRM on PACTOR
PMBOS now from DAVE, Congrats
Listen to mineIt IDs in CW
at the end
At 07:26 PM 12/27/2007, you wrote:
I have never heard a WinLink PMBO identify in CW.
Like I said Dave my winlink station does it all the time.
Either in P1 or CW.
Now if I'm in a KB2KB QSO it will not I will force the SCS
modem to do it. But under computer control it will.
It's in use right
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, W2XJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the whole thing is pointless. Why to I want to try to send
email
via a slow speed serial stream when I have 100 meg Internet on the
computer next to the rig? I firmly believe that these systems are too
organized to
Demetre SV1UY wrote:
What about the Radio Hams that do not have the luxury of 100 meg
Internet that YOU ENJOY, or don't even have a 56k dial-up connection?
What about the ones who travel the world in a boat, in an RV, the ones
that are on holiday away from home? What about the ones who travel
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently deployed PMBOs have no way to reliably determine whether
or not the frequency is locally clear. They may be configured to detect
Pactor signals, but they cannot detect signals in any other mode.
73,
+++additional AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Demetre SV1UY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Currently deployed PMBOs have no way to reliably determine whether
or not the frequency is locally clear. They may be configured to
detect Pactor signals, but they cannot detect
- Original Message -
From: Demetre SV1UY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 4:56 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Questions on digital opposition
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently deployed
Demetre SV1UY wrote:
Sometimes through the night
when I cannot access any European PACTOR PMBOS because I do not have a
decent 80 meters antenna, I can connect to PMBOs in Canada or USA on
30 or 40 meters. How about that?
If it uses more than 500 hertz bandwidth it is not something I want on
Demetre SV1UY wrote:
First of all not many can afford a satellite phone, which is also not
amateur radio. A satellite phone plus connection fees are far more
expensive than a PACTOR MODEM. Second many do not even have the luxury
of a UHF link, nor are they near a town, so HF is playing a
AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Demetre SV1UY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+++So you -- the client -- are activating a PMBO in Canada or the
USA. While you can know that the frequency is clear in Europe, you
have absolutely no idea whether your activating a PMBO in
25 matches
Mail list logo
