Thanks Jeff, that helps a lot.
Dan
--- On Sun, 8/29/10, Jeff Moore tnetcen...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jeff Moore tnetcen...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, August 29, 2010, 9:51 PM
Dan,
The TH-F6A DOES NOT have a modem
Dan,
The TH-F6A DOES NOT have a modem in it. It can be used with an external TNC
(like a Kantronics KPC-3+, Open-Tracker, TNC-X, etc.).
Quite a few of the TH-F6A's suffer from a low deviation problem. If people
complain about your low audio, you WON'T be able to use the radio for packet
Steve,
There have been some terrific responses with some great advice.
I'll focus only on the interface between the radio and the PC's soundcard.
Even for casual usage, I'd recommend that you not use the built-in soundcard
that came with your computer, and that you probably use for PC things
I use the free method of the FCC.
http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm?job=home
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 11:18 AM, John Becker, WØJAB
w0...@big-river.netwrote:
What does one have to do to re-new their ticket on-line
now? Been so lone I forgot
--
Mr.C.Robinson
73 DE KF6NFW
And if you are an ARRL member, they will do it for you free.
73 Buddy WB4M
What does one have to do to re-new their ticket on-line
now? Been so lone I forgot
http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html
Chat, Skeds, and Spots all in one (resize to suit)
Facebook=
Of J. Moen
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2010 1:30 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RE-NEW LICENSE
John,
There is an FCC Registration Number (FRN) associated with your call. You
need the FRN and a password to logon to FCC's Universal Licensing System
(ULS).
Go to http
Smooth as baby's bum.
--
From: Dave AA6YQ aa...@ambersoft.com
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2010 2:37 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] RE-NEW LICENSE
I just renewed my license via ULS, as described below. I had an FRN
At 11:52 AM 7/17/2010, you wrote:
And if you are an ARRL member, they will do it for you free.
73 Buddy WB4M
Thanks buddy, and yes, a life member
Do I need to do anything or is this an automatic happens thing they do?
John, W0JAB
HOT STICKY Missouri.
Q How do you know it's summer in
Regulatory Fee and a $5 ARRL processing fee.
- Original Message -
From: John Becker, WØJAB
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2010 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RE-NEW LICENSE
At 11:52 AM 7/17/2010, you wrote:
And if you are an ARRL
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 08:46:18PM -, raf3151019 wrote:
Do any Old Buffers in the UK remember the original Ros, the one by the
name of Edmundo Ros ? He used to have a small band, had a half hour
a week on the old BBC radio and his band played at social gatherings
where the young rich and
On 6/19/2010 9:28 AM, aa777888athotmaildotcom wrote:
Skip,
I looked at your patent and could not believe my eyes. You patented a
tone detector and a beeper. One could have argued that it covered the
original beeper pager. You could have owned the entire paging market
(or did you?). Amazing
Hi Jerry:
there is activity on 7.173 all day long starting about 8am cst and going to 5
or 6 pm at night..(depends on when the European station start coming in---
they pretty much don't care who they step on-- of course some just don't hear
so well,, (kind of like contesters)) Band is in bad
http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/
-Original Message-
From: Chris [mailto:w...@mchsi.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 8:33 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta
Hi, where do you go to download the software?
Thanks--- Bob C WU9Q
obrienaj wrote:
This shows I am ranked number 1 among digitalradio ! That is because I am
the only digitalradio member to participate.
You are still at the top of the league Andy...
RankCallsign160 80 60 40 30 20 17
15 12 10
I guess that's because you Andy are the only one that I know
of that try's *every* new mode that comes down the pike.
I guess I really need to take a good look at some of the newer
sound card modes. I just got so turned off by that do nothing
PSK 31.
John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
I guess I really need to take a good look at some of the newer
sound card modes. I just got so turned off by that do nothing
PSK 31.
The various WSJT modes can be quite entertaining, especially if you are
into VHF and UHF and JT65 is gaining support on HF as well.
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Juergen dl...@darc.de wrote:
Good summary about the properties of the different digi-modes. I really
like it
Thank you for your kind comment
However: I don't follow his conclusion about the mode to choose for rag
chew qso's: Based on my experience with a
It will probably work well. His feedback score is good so it must be at least
Ok on performance. The only reason I went with the Signalink was to gain more
throughput on Winmor. My Blaster and use of a motherboard soundcard served me
well on many different modes for several years and this
Looks nice!
Better buy now, though, because when the EUrocrats find out about this
manufacturer he is likely to be bankrupted by the regulatory requirements.
http://www.rohsregulations.com/rohs-faq.htm
http://www.cetest.nl/emc-harmonized-standards.htm
Steinar Aanesland wrote:
Hi all
I am whispering on 60m @ 5.2872 Dial with 5W.
I'm still on 80M from yesterday when some friends of mine, who don't
have 5MHz permits, wanted to try the program out.
I will probably return to 60M today, but will be RX only when I have to
go out.
Cheers -
Hi all
I am whispering on 60m @ 5.2872 Dial with 5W.
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
obrienaj wrote:
I'm getting out
4 spots:
Timestamp
Call MHz SNR Drift GridPwr ReporterRGrid km
az
2009-11-20 01:36 K3UK10.140193 -20 0
Been reading the comments here and I operate from Manila area there region 3
there allows me to operate voice on 7045 and 7085 khz on LSB where I can't
operate it here in the USA. Would be interesting to do that in USA.
Larry Fields
Hi Andy,
Is there any likelihood of future MixW development, for example adding
Patrick's RSID or CALL-ID features? I get asked this myself and can't answer
as I'm not on any MixW mailing lists.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien
Nothing that I have heard. Nick is somewhat more active, as his
health has improved, but I hear that the focus of Mixw improvement is
on the logging aspect.
Andy
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Simon (HB9DRV)simon.br...@kns.ch wrote:
Hi Andy,
Is there any likelihood of future MixW
Hi,
It's good to hear Nick is better - long time no news.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
- Original Message -
From: Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com
Nothing that I have heard. Nick is somewhat more active, as his
health has improved, but I hear that the focus of Mixw
What is the attraction of MixW now that we have so many other multimode
digital programs that are freely available with one program even open
source and cross platform?
73,
Rick, KV9U
Andy obrien wrote:
Nothing that I have heard. Nick is somewhat more active, as his
health has improved,
Rick W wrote:
What is the attraction of MixW now that we have so many other multimode
digital programs that are freely available with one program even open
source and cross platform?
73,
Rick, KV9U
Rick, nearly all members of Texas Army MARS and Region 6, are using
MixW. idly
MixW has (I think) support for the data modes used by satellites - that's
one thing I would like to support.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
- Original Message -
From: jhaynesatalumni jhhay...@earthlink.net
What am I missing?
jhaynesatalumni wrote:
No, let's get back to Rick's question and ask what it is about
MixW that you find to be superior to everything else out there.
I downloaded a trial version of MixW long ago and wasn't impressed
enough to want to go further with it. What am I missing?
I can't speak for
chas,
What are the MARS operators using MixW for? Are there modes that are not
available on other programs that they find compelling?
I downloaded MixW again today, but it looks about the same as it did in
past years. It is a fairly clean interface (albeit, that is a subjective
thing for an
I think MARS uses MixW mostly for MT63. Here in South Carolina, in Navy
MARS, we are standardizing on using fldigi for MT63, and before that
some people used MixW and some used Nino's program. It all boils down to
whicher user interface is easier to use, or to train people to use. If
everyone
My 2 cents worth:
I have tried them all and still prefer MixW. It is a simple program yet
does everything I want it to. It is neat and orderly in layout and
appearance. It will use my RAC CD, a lot of logging programs won't. I
just click on a callsign and the logging info fills right
It is all about the visual simplicity of its interface . . . elegant in its
minimalism. And I say that truly as a complement. Although I like HRD and
MultiPSK both for other reasons, MixW is easier to use. More pleasing to the
eyes especially versus MultiPSK.
Rick - KH2DF
Sent from my iPhone
@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New version of Mixw
My 2 cents worth:
I have tried them all and still prefer MixW. It is a simple program yet
does everything I want it to. It is neat and orderly in layout and
appearance. It will use my RAC CD
I think that as a digital mode application, MixW is good , but it
has lagged seriously behind other applications in the past 2-3 years.
The DX cluster operations are no-where near as good as Winwarbler
affords via the Spotcollector interface, or the opportunities DM780
has provides via HRD's
Buddy and Rick,
What you are describing seems to be flidigi more than any other program.
Have you tried this program? And unlike Windows-only programs, fldigi
works on more platforms than any other program of its type. Maybe the
RAC CD won't work on fldigi though.
Fldigi is ultra clean and
to the program.
73 Mark KQ0I
--- On Mon, 6/15/09, Charles Brabham n5...@uspacket.org wrote:
From: Charles Brabham n5...@uspacket.org
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New version of Mixw
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, June 15, 2009, 7:51 PM
MixW has
Has there been any further progress on this mode?
Regards
Kevin, ZL1KFM.
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 4:56 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New amazing JT65-HF
and of course the modes works well,
Yes, a new version for Alpha testing was released last week. As
usual, a few issues were uncovered and some fixes developed. I would
guess that it is perhaps a month or two away from a beta release.
Andy K3UK
2009/5/21 Gmail - Kevin, Natalia, Stacey Rochelle spar...@gmail.com:
Has there
OK, thanks Andy
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland saa...@... wrote:
Hi Andy
Any news about JT65-HF?
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
Steinar, I think an official release from the author W6CQZ is still a few
weeks
Hi Andy
Any news about JT65-HF?
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
I think it is a few weeks away from being released. I should make it
clear it is NOT a NEW MODE, just new software that makes JT65A on HF a
lot easier.
Andy K3UK
2009/3/25 Gmail - Kevin, Natalia, Stacey Rochelle spar...@gmail.com:
Andrew,
Any news when this digital mode might be out to
Andrew,
Any news when this digital mode might be out to use?
Regards
Kevin, ZL1KFM.
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 5:56 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New amazing JT65-HF
and of course the modes
Peter Frenning [OZ1PIF] wrote:
Andrew O'Brien skrev:
and of course the modes works well, here is my brief 80M monitoring around
0400 today
Call #Times heard
N9GUE3
W7YES7
ZS6WN3
N9DSJ10
Notice that South African was heard,
Abdy K3UK
--- In
Peter Frenning [OZ1PIF] wrote:
And of cause the classical question from those of us who live in a
Micro$oft-free zone: Will there be a Linux version?
Or, better yet, documentation of the JT65 modulation
schemes, so JT65* can be added to existing radio
programs like fldigi.
--
All rights
I think it is open, already in three different applications
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Rik van Riel r...@surriel.com wrote:
Peter Frenning [OZ1PIF] wrote:
And of cause the classical question from those of us who live in a
Micro$oft-free zone: Will there be a Linux version?
Or, better
We have been very fortunate to have Tony, K2MO's detailed lab testing to
figure out which modes work under different conditions and it has been
surprising, and actually a bit disappointing, because most digital modes
can only tolerate a small amount of ISI and Doppler.
I recently thought of
Hi all
There is some MFTT activity on around 14.075 now
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
Norbert Pieper wrote:
Hi Paul,
try the new MFTT 3.0.150_Beta it now has a simple FEC in a way that
single damaged characters are suppressed. They will no longer damage
the sync of the whole word.
Do not
Hi Paul and the rest
I am testing MFFT with some local HAM here. I am running a beacon
(double) in MFFT on 14.075 now.I will let it be one for about 20min
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
pa0ocd wrote:
Hello Norbert,
Yes ok about tuning in, in the first Test I was doing only the
transmitting
Thanks to everyone who responded. Offline and to the group. The encouragement
it appreciated. Have a great day and thanks again.
73
Steve
V73CS
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 2:01 AM
Subject:
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New MFTTY Version 30.145
HI,
I have just downloaded this program and installed it on my radio computer.
Problem, when I run it after installing I get the error message Run-time
error '372'
Failed to load control 'RichTestBox' from RICHTX32.OCX. Your
dear buddy
just go on the spot page (chatpage) and there you can find others to test with
greetz
dg9bfc
sigi
dear howard
answers are intermitted in your txt
To All,
I did download the new release and found a couple of things.
Pressing the Appointments button takes me to K3UK's page but there's no way to
post comments or log in.
If I instead go to my Favorites and select the page, I can log in and
Well, I don't see the problem if the Tower of Babel is getting larger
and larger. I think diversity is crucial to innovation.
I find it satisfactory to play with new modes, and I have to play with
them to find out what the
advantages are (..) over previous modes .
My thanks to all of you
@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New MFTTY Version 30.145
Well, I don't see the problem if the Tower of Babel is getting larger
and larger. I think diversity is crucial to innovation.
I find it satisfactory to play with new modes, and I
DTMF tones are easy to distinguish for us OT's. Maybe not so easy for
new digital hams, but and that might be a useful characteristic as long
as it can compete well against the existing modes of which we have many,
some with not that much difference in performance.
A couple days ago I started
sigi
- Original Message -
From: Rick W
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 10:43 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New MFTTY Version 30.145
DTMF tones are easy to distinguish for us OT's. Maybe not so easy for
new digital hams
100%agree
dg9bfc
sigi
- Original Message -
From: kh6ty
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New MFTTY Version 30.145
There is always a search for a Holy Grail of digital modes for ham radio,
with ease
100%agree
dg9bfc
sigi
- Original Message -
From: Steinar Aanesland
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New MFTTY Version 30.145
Well, I don't see the problem if the Tower of Babel is getting larger
http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/index.html
S
grant390 wrote:
Ok, help us out here.
A new version of What?
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Russell Blair
russell_blai...@... wrote:
A New Version 3.0.144 with some up grades
Russell
=
IN GOD WE TRUST !
new version of mftty
now it is version 30.145
see here
http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/index.html
download it and try it out
go on the sked page
http://www.obriensweb.com/sked/
log in to group / page digitalradio ... find others there to try out the
software
bug comment and whishes of
Richmond, IN
- Original Message -
From: Siegfried Jackstien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New Version .144
new version of mftty
now it is version 30.145
see here
http://www.polar-electric.com
.
Can we all try to establish a meeting frequency for using this mode?
73 Buddy WB4M
- Original Message -
From: W6IDS
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 12:23 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New MFTTY Version 30.145
To All,
I did download
*
- Original Message -
*From:* W6IDS w6...@verizon.net
*To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Thursday, January 15, 2009 12:23 AM
*Subject:* Re: [digitalradio] Re: New MFTTY Version 30.145
To All,
I did download the new release and found a couple of things.
Pressing the Appointments
there
as well -
http://www.obriensweb.com/sked
Howard W6IDS
Richmond, IN.
- Original Message -
From: F.R. Ashley
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 12:35 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New MFTTY Version 30.145
I've tried calling CQ endlessly
From: kc4cop [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 Time: 03:22:45
Andy:
I keep getting a 404 page not found error on the other end of this
link. I have not seen others complain of a broken link. Is the link
good? I have not had a 404 error with any other website.
'73s
Dick Zseltvay, KC4COP
If WINMOR includes a descendant of SCAMP's busy frequency detector, this is
great news.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jon
Maguire
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 8:47 PM
To:
expeditionradio wrote:
A blatant example was what we saw with abolition of morse testing. If
the old morse test wasn't enough to scare away the first generation of
computer-raised youngsters, then the next generation of web kids was
turned off by the vitriol spewed by those who fought to keep
) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Miroslav Skoric (YT7MPB) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New Hams and New Digital Technology
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, July 5, 2008, 11:16 AM
expeditionradio wrote:
A blatant example was what we saw
Miroslav,
Try going to:
http://www.tapr.org/pr_whypacketradio.html
to see if it meets your needs.
Rick W3BI
--- On Sat, 7/5/08, Miroslav Skoric (YT7MPB) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Miroslav Skoric (YT7MPB) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New Hams and New Digital Technology
Hello Dick,
Mixw has a Contestia+RTTYM DLL. The second mode (RTTYM) is not very
interesting has you have the same sort of problem as with RTTY (you can
switch from one set to another of characters and lose part of the text).
I don't know why these modes are not definively integered in Mixw.
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New Hams and New Digital Technology
Hello Dick,
Mixw has a Contestia+RTTYM DLL. The second mode (RTTYM) is not very
interesting has you have the same sort of problem as with RTTY (you can
switch from one set to another of characters and lose part
Contestia is available in MixW, just download it from the main MixW web
site, it's an add on which I believe includes Olivia and RTTYM.
73 de
Ron W4LDE
kc4cop996 wrote:
Patrick:
Please advise the version of MixW that has Contestia as one of its
modes. I am using version 2.18 and can find
HI John,
I was in the USAF from 1968-1972, and we used the old oilers with punched
tape, I think it was a model 15? Nothing like the smell and noise of the
old clunkers.
73 Buddy WB4M
Interesting statement.
Not to long ago I was at a meeting of a big group of hams.
The subject came up
I was in the USAF from 1968 to 1972 but did not work in communications
(more along the lines of security, HI). It was not until a few years
after I was relicensed in 1980 that I got involved with digital modes
buying a Model 15 and making a simple TU promoted by the ARRL as a state
of the art
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 8:34 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New Hams and New Digital Technology
HI John,
I was in the USAF from 1968-1972, and we used the old oilers with punched
tape, I think it was a model 15? Nothing like the smell and noise of the
old
Yes indeed. And that noise and smell lives on in this shack...
You should be here sometime when I have all 3 running at once.
What a wonderful sound !
At 07:34 AM 7/3/2008, you wrote:
HI John,
I was in the USAF from 1968-1972, and we used the old oilers with punched
tape, I think it was a
The claim was made that Olivia and MFSK16 are better than PSK for
ragchewing. The point of my response was not that these modes are bad --
it was that these modes have characteristics that make them less appealing
than PSK for most ops.
Panoramic reception makes it easy to quickly find an
: [digitalradio] Re: New Hams and New Digital Technology
Yes indeed. And that noise and smell lives on in this shack...
You should be here sometime when I have all 3 running at once.
What a wonderful sound !
At 07:34 AM 7/3/2008, you wrote:
HI John,
I was in the USAF from 1968-1972, and we used
Hello all,
Just to say that aside to Olivia, you have a mode which name is Contestia,
which is twice quicker than Olivia and almost as sensitive. It is built on
the same principle as Olivia but with different parameters and a reduced set
of characters.
It is present at least on Mixw and
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New Hams and New Digital Technology
Hello all,
Just to say that aside to Olivia, you have a mode which name is Contestia,
which is twice quicker than Olivia and almost as sensitive. It is built on
the same principle as Olivia but with different
Lindecker
*Sent:* Thursday, July 03, 2008 3:06 PM
*To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [digitalradio] Re: New Hams and New Digital Technology
Hello all,
Just to say that aside to Olivia, you have a mode which name is
Contestia,
which is twice quicker than Olivia and almost as sensitive
--- On Thu, 7/3/08, tailfeathers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: tailfeathers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New Hams and New Digital Technology
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, July 3, 2008, 4:03 PM
PSK software is simple to use and free everywhere
Benson wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave AA6YQ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On what basis do you claim that Olivia, DominoEX, and MFSK are
better than
PSK for ragchewing? Olivia is slow, and MFSK is difficult to tune.
I could care less about mode envy but I will
garylinnrobinson wrote:
If most PSK operators are interested in rag chewing -they need to move
on to a better digital mode. PSK and RTTY are the two worst modes
available. And that's the problem. Too many people, groups, and
leaders in the Ham Community promoting OLD and less than effective
On what basis do you claim that Olivia, DominoEX, and MFSK are better than
PSK for ragchewing? Olivia is slow, and MFSK is difficult to tune. By
design, DominoEX addresses both of these issues, but at the expense of
increased bandwidth -- which makes panoramic reception less attractive. You
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New Hams and New Digital Technology
garylinnrobinson wrote:
If most PSK operators are interested in rag chewing -they need to move
on to a better digital mode. PSK and RTTY are the two worst modes
available. And that's the problem. Too many
I think the basic problem is that fewer than 10% of PSK31 operators have ever
bothered to learn how to set up split operation. One more reason that the mode
is great for casual DXing, but next to useless for serious DX work.
73,
Bill
It is possible without much skill or cunning to work split audio frequencies
in BPSK. MixW does it quite well once someone showed me how. I run across DX
stations occasionally that transmit at one point on the waterfall and listen
at another. Split RF frequencies are another matter and I agree why
Bill Lovell wrote:
I think the basic problem is that fewer than 10% of PSK31 operators have
ever bothered to learn how to set up split operation. One more reason
that the mode is great for casual DXing, but next to useless for serious
DX work.
73,
Bill
I have never tried PSK31. I
Well said Bonnie. I came to ham radio late in life as it were. I was first
licensed in 2001 and upgraded last year with end of Morse testing. Frankly
I'd like to get the code down to a usable level but a small problem with
hear dyslectic make it difficult and frustrating.
I well know the feeling
HEAR HEAR!
Gil, W0MN http://webpages.charter.net/gbaron
N 44.082147 W 92.513085 1050' EN34rb
Hierro Candente, Batir de repente
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Bernstein
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 1:48 PM
To:
As usual, Dave puts the correct perspective to advancing technology. Ask
yourself why others would attack what many radio amateurs enjoy doing
and even go so far as to use extreme name calling and personal attacks
of hams don't happen to support their vision or beliefs of what should
be a
Thanks Gerd. Placing the letter n in that position does enable the new
Reception Report to be viewed, thanks.
73, Dennis, KA6GDT
- Original Message -
From: gerdslogger
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 10:24 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New
To be able to provide the remarkable number of modes in MultiPSK *and* have
a UI conforming to the Windows usability guidelines is verging on the
impossible, especially once you factor in supporting users and maintaining
websites.
IMO the user community should be very grateful to Patrick for
To do everything users want could easily take several years at 60 hours a
week plus the associated costs which are not inconsiderable.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
- Original Message -
From: Simon Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To provide the ultimate software would require a team of three or four
User Interface, also known as GUI (Graphical User Interface) when compared with
an old VT-100 type terminal interface or even a teletype for those of a
'certain age'.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
- Original Message -
From: John Bradley
qu'est-ce que UI?
qu'est-ce que UI?
John
VE5MU
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Simon Brown
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 2:00 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK
To be able to provide
ahh I am of that certain age but UI could also apply to me as
(u)n(i)tiated hi hi
tnx Simon
John
VE5MU
User Interface, also known as GUI (Graphical User Interface) when compared
with an old VT-100 type terminal interface or even a teletype for those of a
'certain age'.
Simon
Tooner wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Jose A. Amador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
... but what it does and how it does.
... And certainly MultiPSK does its stuff WELL
... as a peek at its specs will show you.
How about telling us what that 'stuff' is, as you are more familiar
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
