I use Amanda to make nightly backups of a bunch of servers using GNU tar.
However, gtar doesn't seem to respect its --one-file-system flag with /proc.
Amanda runs a variation of this command:
# /usr/local/bin/gtar --create --file - --directory / --one-file-system
--sparse
On Nov 18, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
See the output of 'mount(8)' for the names of all the mounted filesystems on
your machine.
$ mount | grep proc
procfs on /proc (procfs, local)
*NOTE*WELL* that '/proc' is *not* a separate filesystem. It is merely a
_directory_ with a
On 06/23/10 11:35, Polytropon wrote:
Of course, all write attempts to /var will then fail.
Or even worse: they'll succeeded. And then when you re-mount /var,
you'll lose access to all the files you've written in the mean time.
--
Kirk Strauser
pieces of hardware to play nicely together?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 04/12/10 10:50, Mark wrote:
Would you need to load atapicam into the kernel??
That doesn't seem to change things. I'll try again later today by
rebooting with atapicam_load=YES in /boot/loader.conf just for giggles.
--
Kirk Strauser
burners to the on board esata. YMMV
Good grief. Thanks for the information.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd
-v
otp-md5 [something]
Password:
$
Any idea why that may be or how I could troubleshoot it, short of
bisecting the sudo releases until I find the culprit?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On 02/04/2010 10:26 AM, Kirk Strauser wrote:
Any idea why that may be or how I could troubleshoot it, short of
bisecting the sudo releases until I find the culprit?
Eh, did it anyway. The problem was with a change added between 1.7.2p1
and 1.7.2p2. This patch fixes it:
--- auth/pam.c.orig
; rewind. Isn't that what make -DDISABLE_CONFLICTS does?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
can't even start downloading the distfiles (using make
fetch) until I pkg_delete the old version. With the old system, I could
do everything up through building the new port so that the time between
running pkg_delete and make reinstall is minimized.
--
Kirk Strauser
you see jails as particularly important or useful when not in
a hosting environment where you're giving root access to an untrusted
party? How far do you go toward segregating services? Theoretically, you
could have a jail per daemon, but it seems like down that path lies madness.
--
Kirk Strauser
for those ports that don't actually build until you run make install,
but at least I can get the distfile download out of the way.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
fixes.
All that said, is there a better way to specify SourceForge mirrors? A
blacklist would be ideal for this specific situation, but I'm open to ideas.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
On Aug 11, 2009, at 6:54 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:18:43AM -0500, Kirk Strauser wrote:
On my FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE system (from July 29), I'm trying to enable
OpenMP for the graphics/ImageMagick port. With the
IMAGEMAGICK_OPENMP
option set, I get this from make
On Aug 11, 2009, at 9:53 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
Have you also built perl-threaded?
I just now recompiled Perl with threads enabled, then Imagemagick,
with identical results.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
to support OpenMP... -fopenmp
If I go on to build it, there's no other mention of OpenMP in the
output. What am I doing wrong?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
On Tuesday 09 June 2009 03:10:46 am Matthew Seaman wrote:
Or store your data in a RDBMS rather than in the filesystem.
Hear, hear. I'm hard pressed to imagine why you'd need 100M 1KB files.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
, great RAID
support, and nearly instant snapshots. You should check into it.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
my 6 disk system with 2 750GB disks, 2 500GB disks and 2 320GB disks
does fsck in 40 minutes. if you exclude these 320GB disk containing
system and squid cache (LOTS of files) it takes 5 minutes
That's a great example of why I like ZFS on new installations.
--
Kirk
hyperlinks all over.
In fairness, a good info browser (eg Emacs) makes searching in an info doc
trivially easy. I think the biggest problem is that /usr/bin/info is horrid
and people lump their impression of it onto their impression of info docs as a
whole.
--
Kirk Strauser
On Thursday 04 June 2009 11:53:38 am Kirk Strauser wrote:
For some reason, BIND 9 (FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE) isn't properly forwarding
queries.
Commenting out
// zone 10.in-addr.arpa { type master; file master/empty.db; };
from named.conf fixed the problem. That's kind of... embarrassing
. You had to go there, didn't you?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
don't have to remember
what some single-letter option meant. I pretty much never use them on
the command line, though.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
really had to go looking for that interpretation.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Thursday 04 June 2009 11:20:24 am Chris Rees wrote:
PS Does _anyone_ prefer info manuals, apart from Stallman?
I like them *in their place*. Can you imagine how long the man page for GCC
would be? IMHO, though, info pages are only tolerable within Emacs.
--
Kirk Strauser
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
10.in-addr.arpa.10800 IN SOA 10.in-addr.arpa.
nobody.localhost. 42 86400 43200 604800 10800
So, why isn't named directing that query to the configured forwarder? I'm
99.9% certain this has been working recently.
--
Kirk Strauser
have on disk, my addressbook etc.
I agree completely. I'd never voluntarily trust my personal information to a
system that I (or other interested parties on my behalf) couldn't audit.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Putting swap on ZFS is listed as broken on the wiki. Is that still true of
the newly MFC'ed version?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
system needs swapping under normal operation, using ZFS is really
bad idea as it needs lots of memory - which you are already short of.
It was more of the just in case, with plenty of RAM for normal operation.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions
digits, such
as 2009-01-01 would be 09/001, 2009-02-01 would be 2009/032.
Like this?
$ date +'%y/%j'
09/154
$ date +'%Y/%j'
2009/154
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
of documenting it in one canonical location, and
pointing everything else at that location (instead of having to maintain every
related man page every time it's updated).
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Ignore him please.
Sent from my iPod
--
Kirk
On Jun 3, 2009, at 6:14 PM, Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
wrote:
PS. I love FreeBSD for its excellent documentation. Can't tell
something similar about Linux, sadly.
---
This manual is no longer maintained. It may
in such cases when the security payoffs are so great.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Thursday 28 May 2009 06:13:11 am Wojciech Puchar wrote:
rsh is as secure as the communication channel. If it can be considered
secure - DO USE rsh, because it's fastest as it doesn't have any
encryption overhead.
Are you on a 386?
--
Kirk Strauser
if you brought that level of bullheaded incompetence into my company.
/rant
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions
,
particularly if performance is an issue.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
boatload of subtle incompatibilities when
handling stuff at that level.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 11:44:03 am Glen Barber wrote:
Thanks to your attitude, actions, and demeanor, I will be
unsubscribing from this list.
Don't. He's hardly the only PITA in support mailing lists. Just add him to
your killfile and move on.
--
Kirk Strauser
.
It's been 100% reliable on every amd64 machine I've put it on (but avoid it on
x86!). 7-STABLE hasn't required any tuning since February or so.
UFS and gstripe/gmirror/graid* are good, but ZFS has spoiled me and I won't be
going back.
--
Kirk Strauser
you end up with absolutely horrible performance.
Furthermore, it's just not that well tested. Sun designed ZFS for 64-bit
systems and I think 32-bit support was pretty much an afterthought.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
On Friday 22 May 2009 11:07:34 am Sebastiaan van Erk wrote:
Ok, that's a clear answer. Are there any alternatives? For example a PCI
expansion card that does USB device mode and is programmable? Might be
difficult to get working under FreeBSD though maybe?
You might look at getting an Arduino
On Friday 22 May 2009 01:05:57 pm Warren Block wrote:
Seems like it'd be less work to have the FreeBSD system close the
switches of a real USB joystick.
Think so? I had an Arduino writing messages to my kids on a 7-segment display
in about an hour. I would think that finding the right USB
On May 20, 2009, at 7:00 AM, Mel Flynn wrote:
Check with top what the CPU time is, it's not the same as the wall
clock.
Give me *some* credit. :-)
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
sendmail_enable=NO
(WTF?)) and disabled mail
system (eg sendmail_enable=NONE)?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 10:32:57 Mel wrote:
Even though 7.1 has bugfixes, this kind of guesswork causes a lot of
downtime for OP without any certainty that things will be any better.
If by lots you mean 2 minutes for a reboot, I'd be inclined to agree.
--
Kirk Strauser
On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:45 PM, Mel wrote:
On Wednesday 28 January 2009 11:24:50 Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 10:32:57 Mel wrote:
Even though 7.1 has bugfixes, this kind of guesswork causes a lot of
downtime for OP without any certainty that things will be any
better
) but wondered if I missed something.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
obsession with keeping swap utterly empty
before it drives you nuts. FreeBSD isn't designed to work that way
and you'll be fighting it for no good reason whatsoever.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
just don't want to hear
about them any more. :-)
--
Kirk Strauser
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
if the error count increased, or if it started
to detect imminent failure.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions
On Dec 19, 2008, at 12:04 PM, FreeBSD wrote:
This server is very lightly used, so most of the time if the swap is
getting used it shows that something is going wrong.
No it doesn't. Get that wrong idea out of your head.
--
Kirk Strauser
reset the swap?
You don't. The system will handle it for you, I promise. :-)
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions
*know* that it hadn't copied it back to RAM, leaving a copy in swap in
case it needs that RAM suddenly? Really, the OS is better at this than we
are.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
spamming /tmp. You *can* do
something like find /tmp -type f -oldermt '3 days ago' -delete, but that's
just addressing the symptoms.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
already done what you want.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
I have ZFS on my 7.1-PRERELEASE system, and while it does some spiffy things,
in general I'm a bit underwhelmed.
PROS:
Adding new filesystems on a whim is really nice.
It has a lot of really cool other features that I will probably never need.
CONS:
I have nearly 3GB of wired RAM, but
On Monday 01 December 2008 11:49:46 Wojciech Puchar wrote:
UFS is excellent. your problem is that you like to have lots of
filesystems. why don't just make one or one per disk?
For all the usual reasons: faster fsck, ability to set attributes on each
filesystem (noexec, noatime, ro), a
On Monday 01 December 2008 13:24:48 Valentin Bud wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Kirk Strauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It has a lot of really cool other features that I will probably never
need.
then you don't need ZFS. usually you choose a technology because you need
it. if you
for cheap, minimal
cards that are known to work well with recent FreeBSD releases?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/browser_plugins/libgnashplugin.so is
there, but about:plugins doesn't reflect it.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to wonder, though:
what browsers *do* look in /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins? Or is that
just meant to be a convenient place to symlink into?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On Oct 28, 2008, at 4:22 PM, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
The following excerpt from /usr/ports/UPDATING will completely
answer your question :)
Sigh. And I get onto other people for not reading that. :-D
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions
to change
course if I think he's making a bad decision. I'm not paid to do data entry,
but to know enough about my job to know what's best for my employer.
The final decision is his, but until he's made it, I'll do what I can to steer
him.
--
Kirk Strauser
.
I'm also using the radeon driver and it's nicely fast on my machine.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday 11 October 2008 03:10:41 Wojciech Puchar wrote:
well it's KDE. what do you expect ;)
QT4 is quite a lot faster than QT3, and both have been very quick for several
years now. Your argument is quite turn-of-the-millenium.
--
Kirk Strauser
it.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Since killing that build, it's slowly working its way back into the
high 40s (currently bouncing between 48 and 49).
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
would show such different numbers?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it
and letting it manage itself. :-)
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Buf, 138M Free
Swap: 8192M Total, 900K Used, 8191M Free
Since I've yet to find a great explanation for what the different types of
memory are, could someone say why all that inactive memory is better than
using it for cache or buffers?
--
Kirk Strauser
On Thursday 02 October 2008, Kirk Strauser wrote:
I have an AMD system with 6GB of RAM. From dmesg:
usable memory = 6428237824 (6130 MB)
avail memory = 6203797504 (5916 MB)
However, most of it is just sitting there when it looks like it could be
used for buffers or cache
and that your dump is uncorrupted?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 27, 2008, at 10:22 AM, Kirk Strauser wrote:
Occasionally, whenever I open sa0 for reading (typically when Amanda
starts
flushing backups to tape), the system resets.
In summary: RAM issues. Apparently I have to boost the RAM from 1.8V
to 2.1V, or so says its manufacturer. Got my
On Thursday 28 August 2008 07:59:00 H.fazaeli wrote:
Hi all,
I have 3 questions regrading SMP on freebsd 6.x:
1. Is there any userland tool/api to bound a process to a specific cpu?
I don't think so. FreeBSD 7.x just got cpuset backported from -CURRENT.
--
Kirk Strauser
it to a different power
lead. So far so good, but 24 hours does not my confidence earn. Thanks for
the tips! If it's still acting wonky, I'll work through them.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
the card for a duplicate I had stored away.
Is it possible that the drive itself is triggering the reset? I'd find that a
little unlikely, but am certainly not an expert on the matter. Alternatively,
has anyone had that sort of problem with drives attached to that card?
--
Kirk Strauser
.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
use one of the on-board SATA
connectors as an aging boat anchor of a SCSI card if I could get away
with it. I mean, I still use SCSI a lot elsewhere, but I'd like to
ditch it in this one specific application if possible.
Thanks!
--
Kirk Strauser
it should be fairly
clean of any weird legacy settings. Has anyone else successfully installed
KDE4 on FreeBSD 7?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe
systems, and I used quite a few. A word to the wise: dump
PostgreSQL to a text file before the upgrade.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
. If they hit
^C, they get dropped right back to their own account.
I want this because there is intelectual propierty behind this.
Don't put trade secrets in shell scripts.
--
Kirk Strauser
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
/VirtualHostRoot/$1
[P]
On each new connection, Apache picks a random port from the list defined in
zope.txt and passes the connection to that Zope process.
--
Kirk Strauser
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
FreeBSD-specific problems with a lot
of software?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
been getting, and found none.
So back to my original post: take this as a heads-up. Anyone who had a
setup like mine that suddenly stopped working might be able to fix it by
updating their defaultrouter.
--
Kirk Strauser
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
:10ff:fe79:137a
$ ping6 fe80::213:10ff:fe79:137a
ping6: UDP connect: Network is unreachable
This is after rebooting with ipv6_defaultrouter=2001:470:a80a:1::1.
--
Kirk Strauser
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
in getting it up and running.
I think above solution is better.
Perhaps. I'm content with anything that keeps my connectivity up
between reboots.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
place).
So, I'm not too sure which is right or wrong, but I definitely know
that something has changed recently. Consider this a heads-up if you
want.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
,
and it was an *excellent* introduction. I used it to configure Asterisk on
my FreeBSD server.
link: http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596009625/
--
Kirk Strauser
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
stripe while large reads are broken into lots
of tiny ones.
So, back to gstripe. Which of those is it most like?
If there is a tuning knob that I have missed, would appreciate being
told what.
Pass it along, would ya? :-)
Oh, and don't forget to make your partition offsets
--
Kirk Strauser
the exact same values.
--
Kirk Strauser
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thursday 12 June 2008, you wrote:
If there is a tuning knob that I have missed, would appreciate being
told what.
Dang it; hit send on accident.
Anyway, should the partition offsets on your gstripe volume be a multiple of
the stripe size or of the filesystem's block size?
--
Kirk
that shell account to anyone who wants to take a peek. :-)
--
Kirk Strauser
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Does gstripe read an entire stripe at a time? If so, why do that instead of
just reading a few requested blocks? If not, then is there any advantage
to large stripes?
--
Kirk Strauser
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
/UPDATING to see if there are any special
gotchas.
--
Kirk Strauser
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thursday 05 June 2008, Kirk Strauser wrote:
I was testing the same software on my desktop PC when I noticed that it
ran *much* faster, and found that it was spending only about 1% as much
time in the kernel on Linux as it was on FreeBSD.
I'm almost ready to give up on this. I've gone
On Wednesday 11 June 2008, Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Linux:
$ time ./cdbf /tmp/invoice.dbf /dev/null
./cdbf /tmp/invoice.dbf /dev/null 42.65s user 20.09s system 71% cpu
1:28.15 total
On FreeBSD:
Oops! I left that out:
$ time /tmp/cdbf /var/tmp/invoice.dbf /dev/null
/tmp/cdbf /var/tmp
main(int ac,char** av)
(gdb)
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 05 June 2008, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Kirk Strauser wrote:
ktrace(1) and check for the buffer size in use. It is probably too
small.
Kris
It seems to be doing a lot of read()s with 4096-byte buffers. Is that what
you mean? It's also doing a lot of lseek()s to what is likely
1 - 100 of 608 matches
Mail list logo
