[LAD] Re: Update of zita-at1

2024-04-24 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 12:52:07AM +0200, Robin Gareus wrote: > Correct, yet the effective signal delay (which can be measured) > needs to be reported to the host to align the signal. And that should be the average value, not the minimum which can be achieved only during a small fraction of the

[LAD] Re: Update of zita-at1

2024-04-24 Thread Robin Gareus
On 2024-04-25 00:10, Fons Adriaensen wrote: The way 'fast mode' works in the x42 plugin could give you a momentary latency of 2 ms, but the average value will be quite a bit higher and depend on signal content. Correct, yet the effective signal delay (which can be measured) needs to be

[LAD] Re: Update of zita-at1

2024-04-24 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:02:01PM +0200, Robin Gareus wrote: > > > Except the latency in zita-at1 0.8.1 is still around ~20ms, > > > > It will be 10 ms when selecting low latency mode. > > At 48kHz sample-rate, Retuner::set_lowlat(true) sets Retuner::_latency to > 1024. 1024 samples at 96 kHz

[LAD] Re: Update of zita-at1

2024-04-24 Thread Robin Gareus
On 2024-04-24 21:39, Fons Adriaensen wrote: On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 09:24:20PM +0200, Robin Gareus wrote: On 2024-04-20 16:41, Fons Adriaensen wrote: With the new logic deciding on forward / backward jumps, the low latency mode just came for free Except the latency in zita-at1 0.8.1 is

[LAD] Re: Update of zita-at1

2024-04-24 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 09:24:20PM +0200, Robin Gareus wrote: > On 2024-04-20 16:41, Fons Adriaensen wrote: > > > With the new logic deciding on forward / backward jumps, the > > low latency mode just came for free > > Except the latency in zita-at1 0.8.1 is still around ~20ms, It will be 10 ms

[LAD] Re: Update of zita-at1

2024-04-23 Thread Robin Gareus
On 2024-04-20 16:41, Fons Adriaensen wrote: With the new logic deciding on forward / backward jumps, the low latency mode just came for free Except the latency in zita-at1 0.8.1 is still around ~20ms, compared 2ms when using the current plugin's "fast mode". Re. microtuning individual

[LAD] Re: Update of zita-at1

2024-04-20 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 03:47:20PM +0200, Robin Gareus wrote: > Either I have to backport your bug-fixes, or add the missing features to > your new version. With the new logic deciding on forward / backward jumps, the low latency mode just came for free - all it takes is just changing the

[LAD] Re: Update of zita-at1

2024-04-20 Thread Robin Gareus
Hi Fons, it's great to see you have not lot your edge! :) On 2024-04-20 11:50, Fons Adriaensen wrote: > The new Retuner class can probably be used without changes > in the x42-autotuner plugin. I had a quick look and and sadly it's not that simple. The plugin already has a low latency mode,