Hi,
you dropped the following binary package from the yaml-cpp source
package:
libyaml-cpp0.3
It appears it is still depended on by the following packages:
| librime: librime-bin [amd64 armel armhf i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386
powerpc]
| librime0 [amd64 armel armhf i386
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (09/05/2012):
Looks good so far, except for s390 :/
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=huginsuite=experimental
FWIW I think we'll go with a temporary removal from testing to let exiv2
migrate ASAP, given it would get entangled with gdal if we waited
-1 | unstable | source
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (08/05/2012):
Summary after some time spent on it:
- geeqie/sparc is still marked as Building; pinged the admin, might be
a dying build(d).
Built.
- gexiv2 needs decrufting: libgexiv2-0 libgexiv2-0-dbg have to go away;
I'll
Andreas Metzler ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org (08/05/2012):
The patch worked for me. For paranoias sake (and in case the gcc-4.7
switch is reverted) I have uploaded to experimental instead of
unstable.
Looks good so far, except for s390 :/
Source: hugin
Version: 2011.4.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi pkg-phototools guys,
hugin was binNMUd for the exiv2 transition, and FTBFS due to the recent,
insane switch to gcc 4.7; for whatever reason, no bugs were filed up to
now, so here we go.
Full build logs are here:
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (08/05/2012):
Hi pkg-phototools guys,
hugin was binNMUd for the exiv2 transition, and FTBFS due to the recent,
insane switch to gcc 4.7; for whatever reason, no bugs were filed up to
now, so here we go.
Full build logs are here:
https://buildd.debian.org
Andreas Metzler ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org (08/05/2012):
The patch worked for me. For paranoias sake (and in case the gcc-4.7
switch is reverted) I have uploaded to experimental instead of
unstable.
Oh, very nice. I must confess I only tried in my usual work environment,
and didn't try in a
Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org (10/09/2011):
Dear PhotoTools Maintainers,
Do you have time for looking at this bug or would like help with a
NMU?
KiBi said ENOTIME for pkg-phototools-related stuff, and I'm sure people
there would appreciate the love you're proposing for that package, so
I'll
Hi Dorian,
Dorian Fevrier fevrier.dor...@yahoo.fr (10/02/2011):
I just would like to ask you if it was possible to update the
OpenEXR lib?
unfortunately, I've moved to maintaining X and I have almost no time
to work on packages within pkg-phototools. Hopefully somebody will
pick it up.
KiBi.
Hi,
André Wöbbeking woebbek...@web.de (28/08/2010):
I wonder why this package wasn't updated before. 2.4.5 is more than
one year old.
There is even 2.4.10 now.
see the RFH (Request For Help) we already have on libgphoto2, we need
more hands to work on this set of packages, anyone is welcome
André Wöbbeking woebbek...@web.de (07/09/2010):
What kind of help do you mean?
Something like, well, maintenance? Like making sure everything is fine
from a packaging point of view, merging new upstream releases and
adapting the packaging accordingly. Fixing bugs. Etc.
And couldn't you just
Hi Sebastian,
a few comments follow.
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior sebast...@breakpoint.cc (02/07/2010):
Package: libgphoto2
Version: 2.4.6-1
Severity: normal
That'd be wishlist, but oh well.
Since Debian Policy 3.9.0.0 architecture wild cards are defined for
Build-Depends(?:-Indep): [0] and
Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org (18/06/2010):
Hi,
Hi,
any news on fixing this bug?
any news on helping us to fix that one?
#539147 [G|HR| ] [libgphoto2-2] libgphoto2-2: does not install: segfault while
configuring
Please help getting the whole archive tested.
Please help getting
Andreas Metzler ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org (21/03/2010):
Hello,
Hi,
I think 2009.4.0 as available in experimental should go to
unstable. I have rebuilt the packages and would like to upload this
week unless there are strong arguments against this.
as usual, I don't have much time for
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (30/01/2010):
Those changes are quite deep (moving installation-time stuff to
build-time), but should probably make it more robust on the long
run. I think we can live with temporary breakages (should they
happen), given the current state.
Hi,
it's been 2
Hi,
this is long overdue, but probably better than never:
I'd appreciate help on the libgphoto2 package, which has been
RC-buggy for a while. I've prepared some changes in the experimental
branch (although those aren't complete yet since IIRC there's at least
a missing variable definition in
tag 566289 pending
thanks
Raphael Geissert geiss...@debian.org (22/01/2010):
P.S. if this bug isn't fixed by one of the current BSPs I plan to
fix it in the following days via a 1-day delay NMU. If you intend
to fix it, in less than three days, say it NOW.
Is NOW still early enough? Feel
tag 566289 pending
thanks
Raphael Geissert geiss...@debian.org (22/01/2010):
P.S. if this bug isn't fixed by one of the current BSPs I plan to
fix it in the following days via a 1-day delay NMU. If you intend
to fix it, in less than three days, say it NOW.
Is NOW still early enough? Feel
Julien Valroff jul...@kirya.net (02/01/2010):
Package: qtpfsgui
Version: 2.0~svn691-0.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
Hi,
I attach a patch against current git which update the package for
the new name of Qtpfsgui.
thanks for that.
I have chosen to simply name the pacakge
Achim Schaefer achim_schae...@gmx.de (30/09/2009):
a new version of hugin was release.
Please provide a packe for the new version.
$ rmadison hugin|grep 2009
hugin | 2009.2.0+dfsg~rc1-1 | experimental | source, armel, i386, s390,
sparc
Enjoy.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description:
aion jhmac...@uol.com.br (13/09/2009):
Dear Maintainer,
Hi,
After a long time there is a new Qtpfsgui's release:1.9.3.
See at http://qtpfsgui.sourceforge.net/
This new version has many improvements.
As a user of this software, like many others, I would like that Debian update
this
Package: libpano13
Version: 2.9.14-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi mates,
please find attached a patch to fix the FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD.
Thanks for considering.
Mraw,
KiBi.
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -19275,7 +19275,7 @@ case
Robin Cornelius robin.cornel...@gmail.com (18/08/2009):
Hey everyone,
Heya,
I've finally got the bug fix i've been after for a while checked in
to git and confirmed to work, reported upstream etc..
ah, yes, that's why I wanted to look at this package, but I thought
there was a little thing
tag 531974 pending
thanks
Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com (05/06/2009):
please fix the libltdl3-dev build dependency to be libltdl-dev.
Committed to git, experimental branch, thanks. :)
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tag 531978 pending
thanks
Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com (05/06/2009):
I recently did some ramblings about modernizing libgphoto2's udev
rules to work in a Linux world without hal [1]. I added a new udev
rule mode 136 and while I was at it, replaced the slow
check-ptp-camera shell script
fabrice coutade...@gmail.com (30/07/2009):
A few seconds after replying, I thought that we might want to track
(bz2|gz), by the way, in case they go back to the previous
compression method. Might commit that later on if that sounds fine
to others.
I had exactly the same idea, and this
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (30/07/2009):
Fabrice Coutadeur fabric...@ubuntu.com (30/07/2009):
The watch file should be updated to take the gz tarball into account,
and detect then the new tarball.
Thanks, committed in git, experimental branch (where 0.8 is prepared).
A few seconds
Hi,
Dominic Osterried dominic.osterr...@gmx.de (29/07/2009):
Package: libgphoto2-2
Version: 2.4.6-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
indeed, “not good”.
ii libc6 2.9-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libexif12
Gürkan Sengün gur...@phys.ethz.ch (24/07/2009):
Please can you update the version in Debian?
http://hugin.sourceforge.net/ 0.8.0 is out since 2009-07-17
#537542
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-phototools-devel
Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com (05/06/2009):
I recently did some ramblings about modernizing libgphoto2's udev
rules to work in a Linux world without hal [1]. I added a new udev
rule mode 136 and while I was at it, replaced the slow
check-ptp-camera shell script with a more efficient udev
Julien Valroff jul...@kirya.net (27/05/2009):
The new 1.9.3 has been available for a month, would you please upload
it to Debian?
I haven't been available for more than a month. So: When I have time.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Anne C. Hanna or...@ugcs.caltech.edu (20/05/2009):
Package: gphoto2
Version: 2.4.5-2
I have a Canon Powershot S50, and I use gphoto2 with the standard hook
script to have it function as a webcam. But some recent upgrade seems
to have messed up the ability to download photos from the RAM.
Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org (12/05/2009):
Package: libgphoto2
Version: 2.4.5-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: glibc-bsd-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Thanks.
Applied to 2.4.6, which got just released. Hopefully the codebase didn't
change much, so that should
Andreas Metzler ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org (25/04/2009):
Hello,
Heya,
When misreading #525494 I tried building hugin with dpkg-buildpackage
-j3. It fails to build because the dependencies are not correct.
Suggested patch attached.
commenting inline.
cu andreas
diff --git
Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es (16/04/2009):
(Or, rather, I read it initially upon receiving the mail, and
forgot/missed/skipped it when composing my reply).
No problem. :)
Anyway: I never pay attention to any other symbols than T ones when
running my lib-compare.sh script, since those
tag 523587 pending
thanks
Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org (11/04/2009):
checking for libgphoto2 version according to gphoto2-config... 2.4.4
checking if libgphoto2 version is matching requirement = 2.4.5... no
configure: error: Version requirement libgphoto2 = 2.4.5 not met. Found:
2.4.4
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (04/03/2009):
2. OpenEXR packages
===
* openexr
* ilmbase
These two library packages I RFA'ed quite some time ago (#494877 and
#494878), but the person who expressed initial interest won't have
time any time soon, and has
Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be (04/03/2009):
Argyll (#498396) might also be something you want in the
pkg-phototools group?
Looks like Roland is very much more bzr-ish than git-ish. Thanks for
mentioning that package though.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
David Paleino d.pale...@gmail.com (11/04/2009):
libgphoto maintainer: please don't re-send the bug back without
previous discussion, and don't forget to CC gth...@packages.debian.org
if you need any help from my side.
Thanks so much for telling us how to deal with bugreports.
Mraw,
KiBi.
Guillaume Gimenez ggime...@free.fr (10/04/2009):
I come back from gthumb sources where I found that
gp_camera_file_get_info() returns application/x-unknown for NEF
files.
BTW, NEF files are always discarded.
see dlg-photo-importer.c and libgphoto2/gphoto2-camera.c
Well. Maybe it's just too
Jon Daley deb...@jon.limedaley.com (09/04/2009):
Ah, I see that enfuse was uploaded to sid yesterday, and the dependency
has been added. Great!
http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/enblend-enfuse.html
Hello, Jon.
You can have a look at the doc we ship in hugin's README.Debian; it can
be
mitch debianu...@mll.nosnoop.com (04/04/2009):
An error occurred in the io-library ('Could not claim the USB device'):
Could not claim interface 0 (Operation not permitted). Make sure no
other program or kernel module (such as sdc2xx, stv680, spca50x) is
using the device and you have
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (24/03/2009):
Since upstream is close to release 2.4.5, I'm tempted to wait until
2.4.4-1 propagates to testing (which should happen in a week, builds
seem OK at least) to package it. In case it comes in a very next few
days, I might push it through experimental
tag 519495 pending
thanks
Laurent Vivier laur...@vivier.eu (13/03/2009):
Version: 2.4.1-3
FWIW we have 2.4.3-1 in experimental (but I didn't check whether that's
fixed there).
The attached patch corrects the problem.
Thanks.
2.4.4.x series in preparation, due when the release process allows
Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es (04/03/2009):
(pkg-multimedia-maintainers and pkg-phototools-devel Bcc'ed).
The latter Cc'd this time.
2. OpenEXR packages
===
* openexr
* ilmbase
These two library packages I RFA'ed quite some time ago (#494877 and
#494878), but
severity 510443 wishlist
retitle 510443 Please consider shipping a java package for libopenjpeg.
thanks
Johan Henriksson maho...@areta.org (01/01/2009):
the JNI interface found in JavaOpenJPEG/ of the source package is not
included. because of the close dependency on the library it should be
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (24/12/2008):
I've checked again what I wrote for the versioned recommendation on
udev, and the upstream commit is as attached. As you can see, there's
For real, this time, sorry for the noise.
Mraw,
KiBi.
commit
Sarah Sharp saharabe...@gmail.com (20/12/2008):
Incorrect udev rules in the latest libgphoto2-2 package are not
creating USB device files in the plugdev group. That means I can run
gphoto2 as root, but not as a normal user.
/etc/udev/rules.d/025_libgphoto2.rules includes this skip rule:
Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] (30/11/2008):
libgphoto2_2.4.3-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libgphoto2_2.4.3-1.dsc
libgphoto2_2.4.3.orig.tar.gz
libgphoto2_2.4.3-1.diff.gz
libgphoto2-2-dev_2.4.3-1_amd64.deb
Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] (01/12/2008):
qtpfsgui packaging
The annotated tag 1.9.1-1 has been created
at f1976e85eb784e76b86f67e876b695d972b34f03 (tag)
tagging c40c67bb05a087b388e1726b505aafed36dad916 (commit)
replaces 1.9.0-3
tagged by Cyril Brulebois
Lars Rohwedder [EMAIL PROTECTED] (25/11/2008):
According to http://packages.debian.org/etch-backports/enblend this
package is not available for i386, who knows why?
Because the build failed for various architectures, but that didn't get
noticed, it seems:
Hey folks!
*FINALLY!* pushed an “experimental” branch to hugin.git. Runtime totally
untested, but at least source-wise, should be pretty much OK. Feedback
welcome!
Oh, amd64 binaries are temporary available through:
| lftp -c 'mget http://alioth.debian.org/~kibi/tmp/hugin*.deb'
Ubuntu folks
tag 405862 pending
thanks
Hamish [EMAIL PROTECTED] (01/09/2008):
Regardless of the depends/suggests status of autopano-sift, could the
primary subject of this bug report be addressed please?
Sure, that's why I left the bug open.
BTW, that might be a bit confusing. The Subject refers to
fabrice [EMAIL PROTECTED] (05/11/2008):
I've published this version of hugin in my ppa for Ubuntu, and I
changed some little things to make it build.
Here is the diff file with my changes.
You're also missing disabling the 50_disable_enblend_compression patch.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
fabrice [EMAIL PROTECTED] (05/11/2008):
I'll update the package in my ppa. Should I also post my diff here?
No need, thanks, I'm kind of aware of needed work, just missing time to
get it done properly.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] (04/11/2008):
Anyway, maybe some of you have comments on the current README.Debian
in the unstable branch of hugin.git? If that looks fine to you, I'll
push the tca_correct fix, and upload hugin to unstable, request the
unblock, and then we can move to 0.7.0
-tools.install,
| thanks to Chris Chiappa (Closes: #502104). Another one is
| “matchpoint”, but since it wasn't requested yet, don't touch it at the
| moment.
|
| -- Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:00:59 +0100
`--
Happy unblocking!
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
(Dropping -release for now.)
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (03/11/2008):
I wonder whether it perhaps be possible to get the hugin 0.7.0 release
(instead of beta5) into lenny. Iirc the changes to beta5 are a not
that big, it was released rather quickly afterwards.
I didn't check (the diff)
Hi folks,
I'm wondering whether it'd be OK to fix #502104 in my next hugin upload
(the only other change being updating README.Debian to point to
pkg-phototools website, for more info about backports, etc.). That'd
mean adding a line (for a single binary) to debian/hugin-tools.install,
for a tool
Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] (03/11/2008):
while updating hugin's README.Debian, I've been thinking about doing
the following. Instead of giving some steps to install hugin and co
from backports.org (along with reasons to do so), I'm very tempted to
only describe why and what to do
Chris Chiappa [EMAIL PROTECTED] (13/10/2008):
The hugin-tools package does not include tca_correct, an automatic
chromatic aberration corrector, mentioned for instance at
http://hugin.sourceforge.net/tutorials/tca/en.shtml
Adding usr/bin/tca_correct to debian/hugin-tools.install seems to be
Hi,
putting back the bug in the loop, so my fellow pkg-phototools
comaintainers (which includes enblend people) have a chance to read you.
Ben Pearre [EMAIL PROTECTED] (21/08/2008):
Thanks for your fast response, especially given that you have reason
to believe that this is just a
Alexander E. Patrakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] (16/08/2008):
Yes,
fine, build in progress, upload will follow.
but upstream has put them into a #if 0 block, so you may want to copy
their decision.
I guess they used that to easily revert it to a non-disabled code in
case it's needed, while my
tag 479135 pending
thanks
Hubert Figuiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] (06/08/2008):
We just decided to suppress all these IDs since we end up doubting
about them. And you can do the same in the Debian package.
Just to make sure, it's sufficient to just delete those 3 lines,
correct?
| ---
(keeping you Cc'd since I'm not sure you're actually subscribed.)
Ignacy Paderewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] (14/08/2008):
Hey,
Hi,
Hugin in lenny is currently uninstallable; version from sid seems to
be OK, wny do we wait for migration it to testing?
thanks for the heads-up. I've pinged a release
Florian Maier [EMAIL PROTECTED] (12/08/2008):
This bug is still present in lenny.
Which is normal since the fixed version didn't migrate yet, due to a bug
in ilmbase (which has just been finally fixed) that prevented the build
on sparc, which in turn prevents the testing migration.
Mraw,
KiBi.
tag 236610 fixed-upstream
thanks
Alexander E. Patrakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] (01/08/2008):
This solved the bug (and a related issue - no output in the
ru_RU.KOI8-R locale) for me. Please update the package.
Hi, and thanks for your work towards upstream communication. I'm hereby
marking the bug in
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (20/07/2008):
Hello,
Hi,
as already noted autopano-sift-* cannot be shipped in Debian due to
patent problems.
Anyway 0.7.0~svn3191-1 invokes autopano-sift-c by default. This bug
could beclosed if the Suggests was changed from autopano-sift to
Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] (19/07/2008):
Steve Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED] (17/07/2008):
When replicating bug #491227, a dialog box pops up requesting that a
bug be logged in upstream's BTS. I think it should be changed to
Debian's BTS.
Error during stitching
Please
Joerg Friedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] (25/07/2008):
FYI: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=492357
As said on IRC, plenty of thanks! I've subscribed to that bug, and I'll
ask for a give-back on sparc once it's fixed, unless dato reschedules it
on his own.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Sebastian Harl [EMAIL PROTECTED] (20/07/2008):
I think it's a package that would be a quite good candidate for
backports.org, so that people can fetch it from there to get better
and better camera support with each and every release.
Agreed.
Nice, will do. I'll probably start with an
Bruno Postle [EMAIL PROTECTED] (21/07/2008):
That's a problem, you would need to roll hugin back nearly a year to
avoid using these enblend-3.1 features and still have something
reasonably 'stable' - But the hugin 0.7.0 release will be quite a
different thing from hugin as it was last July.
Hi folks, again.
The original plan was to fix the FTBFS bug on sparc, add some patches to
get rid of the compression setting for “old” enblend, and everything
would be fine. But the following discussion[1] with upstream led me to
think that we won't be able to have a satisfactory hugin in time
Hi,
I finally got some time to finish preparing the libgphoto2 upload. I've
also forced the update on the alioth git server, but AFAICT, I've been
the only one to work on it lately, so that should be quite harmless, at
least so I hope (and I'm sorry for any inconvenience).
Since the symbols
tag 405389 pending
tag 469449 pending
thanks
Hi all,
I've finally found some time to update hugin's packaging to a later svn
snapshot. I've integrated Jοhan's and Julien's proposition about manpage
building and versioned package relationships. Johan: I'll take a look
later at the parallel
Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] (14/07/2008):
Oh, and it looks like I noticed the pending NMU a single minute too
late, so I'm going to merge its contents into the unstable branch, and
rebase my svn-snapshot branch on top of the unstable branch.
Done, all of the .2, .3, .4 NMUs have
It's in NEW, thanks MadCoder.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp3HEHRBpW7e.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools
for a
giveback might do the trick.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpRYsVbToexP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools
/config
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpuziIGJcJDM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel
not sure if this will get through to pkg-phototools-devel as I'm
not subscribed]
The list isn't moderated or restricted, as you can see on [1].
1.
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-phototools-devel/2008-January/thread.html
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpRJNqpUObHV.pgp
Description
as a single RPM for
Fedora, is that correct?
Thanks in advance. Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp7mf4fwbXAE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman
this.
Indeed.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpg0MoaJoT2x.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel
--rename) is very sufficient.
Not seen this myself before, but yes i have noticed this now. Looks
like an upstream bug report is due.
Maybe transient glitches? Anyway, running uscan several times does the
trick, that's not a huge problem anyway.
Thanks for your help
'Welcome.
--
Cyril
---
debian/control |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index db51516..082051f 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Package: pfsglview
Architecture: any
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
Recommends:
.
I would however consider this as a bug anyway (the severity can be
dropped to minor, as I might be the only person with an index.hmtl
file in ~/)
That's indeed a glitch IMHO, forwarding upstream.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpUgQcqxpwrr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
=83d706ecdd07b1942f2c8016639a0e01a4543df5
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-phototools/qtpfsgui.git;a=commit;h=cda18d91c9f775c28afeb29f618708bb6fdf8d51
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpjy4QeS0HuI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg
86 matches
Mail list logo
