Okay,
I've put together a very preliminary integral testing set
(only 25 right now). It compares the Sage integration
(via Maxima) to results from Schaum's. It also does timing
comparisons of Maxima and FriCAS (Axiom).
SymPy is more difficult, because of difficulty in simplifying
results for
On Nov 23, 2008, at 1:17 PM, John Cremona wrote:
2008/11/23 mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Nov 23, 1:03 pm, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Before I jump on the bandwagon, are there any arguments at all
against
this?
Not that I can see. The main reason we chose clisp over
Hi Tim!
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Tim Lahey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay,
I've put together a very preliminary integral testing set
(only 25 right now). It compares the Sage integration
(via Maxima) to results from Schaum's. It also does timing
comparisons of Maxima and FriCAS
On Nov 24, 2008, at 1:37 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
jrpick wrote:
For security, I just mean that if I have it running on a server, I
don't want people to be able to do malicious things like play with
the
filesystem, send mail, or drop mysql tables. More than a sandbox,
however: you
On Nov 25, 2008, at 6:27 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
Hi Tim!
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Tim Lahey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Okay,
I've put together a very preliminary integral testing set
(only 25 right now). It compares the Sage integration
(via Maxima) to results from Schaum's.
Ok, I consider this vote closed and since there were only +1 votes
also a positive conclusion has been reached.
As a first step for 3.2.1.a1 I have created #4615 which makes boehm_gc
a default spkg. It is optional now and has gotten some decent build
testing via the optional M2.spkg, so things
On Nov 25, 4:36 am, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Tim Lahey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
You're welcome. Since I prefer to use Git rather than Mercurial,
I've created a Git repository for my code as I work on it. I've
put up a second test
This looks very cool and was posted on the Scipy list:
Hi scipy-ers -
Some of you may remember CorePy from previous SciPy conferences.
Feedback from those meetings was very helpful for planning the future
of CorePy.
Without further ado...
Announcing CorePy 1.0 - http://www.corepy.org
We are
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Tim Lahey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 25, 2008, at 6:27 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
Hi Tim!
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Tim Lahey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Okay,
I've put together a very preliminary integral testing set
(only 25 right now). It
Em Seg, 2008-11-24 às 13:05 -0800, jrpick escreveu:
For security, I just mean that if I have it running on a server, I
don't want people to be able to do malicious things like play with the
filesystem, send mail, or drop mysql tables. More than a sandbox,
however: you shouldn't be able to
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 6:22 AM, Stan Schymanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mike,
This is pretty cool, thanks! Is there something equivalent for passing
a function f to python or numpy?
I'm not exactly sure what you mean by this so I'll take a guess.
Given, your f=a*x^2+b, do you want
Ronan Paixão wrote:
On Nov 24, 6:49 am, Jason Grout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Pickhardt wrote:
When I say simple I mean really, really, REALLY simple. So simple
it's intuitive for non-programmers. I can program and I could always
run Python scripts or use command line interfaces
Well, you have been happy running clisp, even though it is
substantially slower than GCL.
ECL is presumably faster than clisp, but that is not even remotely
surprising since clisp
is a byte-code interpreter.
I don't know what you mean by the boehm_gc is the best of breed
garbage collector.
Hi,
Should the SR parser support equations?
In the past I've wanted a symbolic expression/equation parser for
making step by step problem solvers.
Timothy
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
On Nov 23, 2008, at 03:37 , mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
here goes 3.2.1.alpha0. Loads of merged patches all over the map. The
total number of ticket with patches is down to 144 from 157, but I
guess I don't need to point out that there is still plenty of patches
to go around :). The
There has been some requests to know if SAGE can be installed as a
bootable USB drive.
1) Download
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/alfredo/sagelivecd/sage_livecd.zip
Inside the zip there are two directories:
boot and SAGE as in:
On Nov 25, 2008, at 7:53 AM, mabshoff wrote:
Cool. I would suggest we open a ticket so that integration in Sage
defaults to any of MMA, Maple, Maxima, Axiom and Sympy. That way
running the test suite (at least for performance) would become trivial
and I would also think that many users might
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Tim Lahey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 25, 2008, at 7:53 AM, mabshoff wrote:
Cool. I would suggest we open a ticket so that integration in Sage
defaults to any of MMA, Maple, Maxima, Axiom and Sympy. That way
running the test suite (at least for
mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
here goes 3.2.1.alpha0. Loads of merged patches all over the map. The
total number of ticket with patches is down to 144 from 157, but I
guess I don't need to point out that there is still plenty of patches
to go around :). The door before the big ReST
On Nov 25, 12:11 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jaap,
On Fedora 10, 32 bits (released today!) I got a build error:
=== =
BUILDING MATPLOTLIB
On Nov 25, 2008, at 8:34 AM, Timothy Clemans wrote:
Hi,
Should the SR parser support equations?
In the past I've wanted a symbolic expression/equation parser for
making step by step problem solvers.
Timothy
Yes, it should. In fact, the parser itself supports, lists, tuples,
etc. as
Dear Mike,
both your guesses are absolutely correct. I am surprised that no one has
asked for it before. It is so convenient to use Sage's symbolic power to
solve systems of equations and then use the solution in a numerical
model. In particular, I would like to apply the solutions to arrays
Hi,
I've added a quite a few integrals to the test suites now.
There are two problems currently:
a) Maxima on occasion takes input which raises an exception.
b) Some of the integrals have multiple solutions and I haven't
found a good way to include and compare these. However, since I
can't
Dear Mike,
both your guesses are absolutely correct. I am surprised that no one has
asked for it before. It is so convenient to use Sage's symbolic power to
solve systems of equations and then use the solution in a numerical
model. In particular, I would like to apply the solutions to arrays
Tim,
What version of sage is required to run this? I get the following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./sage*/sage
--
| SAGE Version 3.1.4, Release Date: 2008-10-20 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and
Hello folks,
at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4567 you can find my
attempt to finally catch up with the release notes of the last three
Sage releases. I know, I know, I am rather late, but things keep
getting in the way. What is now needed to push the official button on
3.2 is a
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:
As Mike said, it requires Sage 3.2.
After an apparently sucessful 'sage -upgrade':
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sage
--
| Sage Version 3.2, Release Date: 2008-11-20
Hi:
I'm currently reading Intellectual Property and Open Source: A Practical
Guide to Protecting Code by Van Lindberg (excellent book, IMHO, written
by a former programmer, turned lawyer). There is one point he drives home which
I never thought about much, and that is the following.
The basic
On Nov 25, 2008, at 10:16 PM, Bill Page wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./integral_test1.sage
Test 1 : Test Passed.
Maxima Time:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ./integral_test1.py, line 96, in module
time_Maxima_friCAS(integrand)
File ./integral_test1.py, line 81, in
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:
Strange,
The timeit code is in sage/misc/sage_timeit.py and
sage/misc/sage_timeit_class.py so I'd check to see if the
code there has the stats attribute. If it does, I'd assume that
somehow Sage didn't pick up the change.
I do not have
Hi Bill,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Bill Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that none of these files has anything named 'stats':
It appears that 'sage_timeit.py' was not updated by '-upgrade'.
Note: Directory sage-3.1.4 is where I previously built sage from
source. I did not
On Nov 25, 2008, at 11:00 PM, Bill Page wrote:
I do not have any file named 'sage/misc/sage_timeit_class.py', instead
there is 'sage/misc/sage_timeit_class.c' and
'sage/misc/sage_timeit_class.pyx'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sage-3.1.4$ find . -name sage_timeit.py
Hi Michael,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 6:53 AM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 24, 1:48 am, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Michael,
Hi Minh,
SNIP
I re-ran the tests under the above Mac OS X system, using this command:
/path-to-sage-root/sage -testall -verbose
This
...[snip]...
... Van Lindberg points
out implicit licenses are not legally binding and presents a legal
horror story of one guy contributing code he do not own to an OS
sourceforge project, only to be bankrupted by lawsuits and SF
being required to remove
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Mike Hansen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Bill Page wrote:
It seems that none of these files has anything named 'stats':
It appears that 'sage_timeit.py' was not updated by '-upgrade'.
Note: Directory sage-3.1.4 is where I previously built sage
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Bill Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still unhappy. Did it really mean 'don't forget to commit'? Where?
Regards,
Bill Page.
You just run hg ci to commit the merge. Then to make the changes
active, you have to start sage with sage -br.
--Mike
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:
...
However, it sage_timeit.py there should be the class,
class SageTimeitResult():
r
I represent the statistics of a timeit() command. I print as a
string so
that I can be easily returned to a user.
def
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Bill Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:
...
However, it sage_timeit.py there should be the class,
class SageTimeitResult():
r
I represent the statistics of a timeit() command. I print as a
string so
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Mike Hansen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Bill Page wrote:
Still unhappy. Did it really mean 'don't forget to commit'? Where?
You just run hg ci to commit the merge. Then to make the
changes active, you have to start sage with sage -br.
That
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:14 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 25, 12:11 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jaap,
On Fedora 10, 32 bits (released today!) I got a build error:
On Nov 26, 2008, at 12:25 AM, Bill Page wrote:
That magic worked. 'integral_test1.sage' runs as expected. Now I'm
happy. :-)
Thanks!
Great. If you have any suggestions (or code), I'd be happy to hear them.
Cheers,
Tim.
---
Tim Lahey
PhD Candidate, Systems Design Engineering
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:14 AM, William Stein wrote:
Bill Page wrote:
After the merge the dates on the 'sage_timeit.py' file did not
change and there is no 'class SageTimeitResult' in that file.
You definitely haven't upgraded to sage-3.2 then. Try this from
sage:
sage: hg_sage.ci()
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 5:10 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4567 you can find my
attempt to finally catch up with the release notes of the last three
Sage releases. I know, I know, I am rather late, but things keep
getting in
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Bill Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:14 AM, William Stein wrote:
Bill Page wrote:
After the merge the dates on the 'sage_timeit.py' file did not
change and there is no 'class SageTimeitResult' in that file.
You definitely haven't
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 4:29 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 5:10 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4567 you can find my
attempt to finally catch up with the release notes of the last three
On Nov 25, 9:42 pm, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 4:29 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 5:10 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
athttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4567you can find my
attempt to
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:47 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 25, 9:42 pm, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 4:29 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 5:10 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 4:45 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:42 PM, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 4:29 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 5:10 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:42 PM, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 4:29 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 5:10 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4567 you can find my
On Nov 25, 9:50 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:47 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 25, 9:42 pm, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 4:29 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 5:10
On Nov 25, 9:53 pm, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 4:45 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
I'm really glad you volunteered, since you have *amazing* attention
to detail. You can upload release notes to a trac ticket -- there should
be one
Oh yeah: Another thing I haven't done in ages is to get the info from
the contributors list and have them added to the Dev Map. This should
also be a ticket for each release in case we have somebody new
contributing.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post
root wrote:
Standard industry practice on half a million open source projects
does not include an I have signed over my copyright on this particular
patch button. A general copyright judgement making the current practice
illegal would wipe out the free software movement overnight (except for
On Nov 25, 10:38 pm, Jason Grout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
root wrote:
Standard industry practice on half a million open source projects
does not include an I have signed over my copyright on this particular
patch button. A general copyright judgement making the current practice
illegal
What is even more important is to do the work for the main features,
i.e. the Sage Release Tour in the wiki during development and not as
an afterthought. The best results there have always been had when the
patch authors did the changes themselves. It would also be great to
clean up the old
On Nov 25, 10:53 pm, Jason Grout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is even more important is to do the work for the main features,
i.e. the Sage Release Tour in the wiki during development and not as
an afterthought. The best results there have always been had when the
patch authors did the
Tim,
Were you just interested in integration or do you intend to work on a
full test suite? If you're interested in building a larger test suite
I'd be happy to work with you (or others) on areas that interest both
Axiom and Sage. Indeed, this might be a good way for students and
mathematicians
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Martin Rubey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Lahey [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
a hint: the simplification facilities in FriCAS are not extremely powerful
(because they try to be correct - in vain). The closest thing to simplify
in
Maxima, Maple, Mathematica etc., is
William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For cooperation: is there an equivalent of InputForm in Sage? I.e.,
given an
object (output), is there a way to have Sage output a string (input),
which
fed back into Sage gives output? (Should be something like a textform of
dumps)
No.
On Nov 26, 2008, at 2:13 AM, root wrote:
Tim,
Were you just interested in integration or do you intend to work on a
full test suite? If you're interested in building a larger test suite
I'd be happy to work with you (or others) on areas that interest both
Axiom and Sage. Indeed, this might
On Nov 25, 11:38 pm, Martin Rubey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
I admit, I'd be extremely interested in using Sage from FriCAS (i.e., the
other way round), because I tried Python a fair bit meanwhile (I even used it
for teaching) and I find it awful.
The main problem to get started is to
61 matches
Mail list logo
