Re: Question on $FileCreateMode for imjournal

Mark C. Allman via users wrote: > I'm seeing this line in /var/log/messages: > > imjournal: filecreatemode is not set, using default 0644 [v8.2312.0-1.fc40 > try https://www.rsyslog.com/e/2186 ] > > From the page > https://www.rsyslog.com/doc/configuration/action/rsconf1_filecreatemode.html, > I

Re: crippling nvidia display issue.

home user wrote: > I tried the command suggested in that log file. > > -- > bash.24[~]: /usr/sbin/akmods --force > Checking kmods exist for 6.8.4-100.fc38.x86_64 [ OK ] > Building and installing nvidia-470xx-kmod [FAILED] > Building rpms failed; see >

Re: F40: mock fails with (some) explicit paths in BuildRequires:

Sam Varshavchik wrote: > I cannot mock-rebuild packages that have /some/ BuildRequires: with explicit > file dependencies, for F40. I have no idea why just /some/ of them are > rejected. > > I'm using mock to rebuild SRPMS in an F40 chroot, and it fails thusly: > > Updating and loading

Re: Where is the source code for a Koji build?

Jeffrey Walton wrote: >> More generally, koji shows the build parameters used, which >> include: >> >> Src: >> git+https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wcm.git#2a4fa39f933f274689c07632e50c7db042247f08 >> >> The commit id can be confirmed as the tip of the f39 branch. >> That's helpful to know

Re: Where is the source code for a Koji build?

Jeffrey Walton wrote: > I'm new to working with Fedora's Release Engineering. I ran across a > package that Failed To Build From Source (FTBS) for Fedora 40 at > . I have C and > C++ experience, and I believe I can help. > > I'm having trouble

Re: wsdd failed Result: resources

g(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/wsdd +%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/default/wsdd %{_bindir}/wsdd %{_mandir}/man8/wsdd.8* %license LICENSE @@ -64,6 +67,9 @@ exit 0 %changelog +* Mon Feb 12 2024 Todd Zullinger - 0.7.1-3 +- fix systemd handling of environment file + * Sat Jan 27 2024

Re: How do I read result of a QR Code

ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > On 1/16/24 15:44, Samuel Sieb wrote: >> On 1/16/24 15:42, Samuel Sieb wrote: >>> You are misunderstanding how this works.  That QR code contains a >>> secret value that lets the OTP application generate the 6 digit >>> codes as needed.  There is no actual code in

Re: gzip eps

I wrote: > Barry wrote: >>> On 15 Jan 2024, at 15:24, Patrick Dupre via users >>> wrote: >>> >>> Traceback (most recent call last): >>> File "/usr/share/lyx/scripts/convertDefault.py", line 68, in >>>if sys.argv[3] == 'ppm' and (im and version >= 0x060305 or gm): >>>

Re: gzip eps

Barry wrote: >> On 15 Jan 2024, at 15:24, Patrick Dupre via users >> wrote: >> >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "/usr/share/lyx/scripts/convertDefault.py", line 68, in >>if sys.argv[3] == 'ppm' and (im and version >= 0x060305 or gm): >>

Re: conflict with ffmpeg

Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 11/24/23 17:40, Michael Hennebry wrote: >> --allowerasing would seem to be the only suggestion likely to result in >> a functional ffmpeg, >> but I do not kow what damage that would cause. >> Suggestions? >> >> I was hoping for a --dry-run or some such option, >> but no

Re: How to downgrade PHP

Clifford Snow wrote: > I just upgraded my F39 machine and received PHP 8.3.0-RC6-1 - nice except > my Nextcloud installation doesn't like it. Any suggestions on how to > downgrade PHP to 8.2 Fedora 39 has php-8.2.12-1.fc39. If you're getting 8.3.0~RC6, you would appear to be on Rawhide (what

Re: Obscure rsyslog question on remote logging

Tom Horsley wrote: > I've got an old PC running Truenas as a local server for backups, > videos, etc. > > I've got another PC I consider my "main" system running rsyslog. > On this PC I have tried (mostly successfully) to direct remote > syslog messages from the Truenas system to logfiles in a

Re: sudoers security question

Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 10/30/23 18:15, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> It seems to me that since /etc/sudoers is visible from a >> standard user account, that all a bad guy has to do is >> cat the file, find some program that is elevated, then >> overwrite that program with his

Re: Source code (SRPM?) for COPR package?

Ian Pilcher wrote: > Is the source code for COPR packages available anywhere? Each copr contains the srpms. If you have one installed and enabled you can pull up the baseurl and browse to the srpm. One way to do it: $ sudo dnf repolist -v copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:tmz:git | grep

Re: rpm output

Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 10/25/23 13:35, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: >> rpm -qi $(rpm -qa | grep pubkey) >> error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 132 >> Header RSA signature: BAD (header tag 268: invalid OpenPGP signature: >> Parsing an OpenPGP packet: >>Failed to parse Signature Packet

Re: Listing a libvirt domain

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2023-10-24 at 12:37 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: >> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >>> As I tried to indicate in my original post, that shows nothing: >>> >>> $ virsh list --all >>>  Id   Name   State >>&g

Re: Listing a libvirt domain

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > As I tried to indicate in my original post, that shows nothing: > > $ virsh list --all > Id Name State > You may be running VM's in the user session rather than system session. Try specifying the user session to connect to with the -c

Re: Thunderbird 115 FC 38

Dave Close wrote: > Tim wrote: >> Adam Mercer wrote: >>> I've been using some of the earlier 115.x builds that showed up >>> for F38 witout issue. This morning I built 115.2.2, from the F39 >>> source RPM using mock, and so far it's been running without issue... >> >>Well, I might disagree. Your

Re: Problem with mediawriter on old Fedora installation

Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 9/14/23 17:21, Joe Zeff wrote: >> On 09/14/2023 03:49 PM, Mike Wright wrote: >>> dd if=f38.iso of=/dev/sdX bs=1m (see note below about bs=) >> >> I've always used mediawriter ever since it was available, and whatever >> came before that as well.  This is the first time

Re: Problem with mediawriter on old Fedora installation

Mike Wright wrote: > On 9/14/23 14:30, Joe Zeff wrote: >> I know that there's a way to put the .iso onto the drive >> with dd, but don't know the proper incantation as I've >> never had to do it before.  If somebody can provide it, >> I'd be grateful. > > dd works well for creating bootable

Re: Upgraded machine to Fedora 38 and now suspending after 15 minues??

Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote: > On 19 Aug 2023 at 23:09, Todd Zullinger wrote: >> And if for some reason that's not an option (though I think >> it is the best answer for a headless machine), there are >> other ways to resolve the effects of this change mentioned &g

Re: Upgraded machine to Fedora 38 and now suspending after 15 minues??

Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 8/19/23 18:25, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote: >> Have 4 machines that are headless machines. >> Boot up, and have VNC run to allow access using XFCE sessions. >> >> After upgrading the one to Fedora 38, have the machine going off >> after 15 minutes since no user is

Re: recommended key pair encryption

François Patte wrote: > What could be helpfull would be to tell people how to create a SHA2 > signature key > > I have a ssh connexion problem after upgrading a remote machine to f38 and > it is hard to find out what to do to solve the problem. > > I succeeded (at last!): > > ssh-keygen -t

Re: recommended key pair encryption

Mike Wright wrote: > Hi all, > > I recall a discussion that may have said RSA was not being accepted in f38 > and a different type was being preferred, possibly ecdsa? It's only old RSA1 keys which use SHA1 which are not accepted by default. RSA keys which use a SHA2 algorithm are perfectly

Re: libvirtd.service won't start

Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 2023-07-09 18:01, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: >> The file should have not been used to create the >> links.  The links should have been created based >> on the reviion of libvirtd > > Why not? That's exactly what ldconfig does. It creates links to the latest > version

Re: How do I remove expired signatures?

ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > Fedora 38 > > $ rpm -qa > ... > :error: Verifying a signature using certificate > 09E55FAF4F7862CD6D558997CDFB5FA52007B954 (Metasploit > ): > 1. Certificiate CDFB5FA52007B954 invalid: certificate is not alive > because: The primary key is not live >

Re: rpm qa signatures

Hi, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > I just upgraded to Fedora 38. > > When I went to ask "rpm" what my version of > Xfce was, I got a ton of this scrolling > over my terminal: > > $ rpm -qa xfce4\* > ... > error: Verifying a signature using certificate >

Re: Where is the Fedora Testing Release repo?

ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > Hi All, > > Where is the Fedora Testing Release repo for Fedora 37? > (I am after the URL not now to run DNF.) > > Unfortunately, I have only gotten to > > https://ap.edge.kernel.org/fedora/releases/37/ > > And could not find it. The testing repos are under

Re: Disable btrfs memory swap file

Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 6/26/23 20:48, Jeffrey Walton wrote: >> Hi Everyone, >> >> I've got a Fedora 38 install (upgrade from F37). The install happened >> with Anaconda. Anaconda created the compressed memory swap file. I >> resized the disk and added a proper swap partition. Now I need to >>

Re: Could not resolve host: mirrors.fedoraproject.org

Jeffrey Walton wrote: > 'dnf update' is failing for me for F38 on x86_64. Is anyone else > experiencing failures during DNF update? > > I want to ensure something did not recently break with systemd (that I > have to fix). There is an ongoing DDoS attack on the Fedora DNS servers. Watch

Re: Startup Problems

stan via users wrote: > On Sat, 10 Jun 2023 00:26:09 -0400 > Robert McBroom via users wrote: > >> The original install went to  the 495.44 version of the nvidia driver >> but my card GT 710 requires  the 470 version. I see in the journal >> >> May 23 13:26:58 HPZ440.attlocal.net systemd[2911]:

Re: Boot failure with 6.3.4-101.fc37

John Pilkington wrote: > I just tried 'sudo akmods --force' and it failed. An updated package > > nvidia-470xx-kmod-470.182.03-2.fc37 > > was placed in testing on 27 May. I haven't tried it yet. The changelog for that package is: Added patch for the Linux kernel 6.3 support. So I'd say

Re: find command problems

francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: > Th following will do I think: > > find . -iname '*pdf' -type f -perm 755 -print0 \ > | xargs -0 chmod 644 Alternately, you can skip -print0 and xargs with: find . -iname '*pdf' -type f -perm 755 -exec chmod 644 {} + -- Todd signature.asc

Re: rsync commands help request

Max Pyziur wrote: > An example of a filename: > rsync: [receiver] mkstemp "/path/to/some/directory/WNYC's Leonard Lopate > Show/.wnyc_lopate.mp3?d=475.0atuCZ" failed: Invalid argument (22) > > It seems blanks and characters such as apostrophes, brackets, etc, cause > problems. ... > The

Re: System networking confusion

Robert McBroom via users wrote: > ~]# route > Kernel IP routing table > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref    Use > Iface > default _gateway    0.0.0.0 UG    100    0    0 eno1 > 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 100    0    

Re: System upgrade verification

Jeffrey Walton wrote: > This always baffles me... Fedora includes irrelevant keys. For > example, old keys and keys for different arches. Something feels wrong > about trusting them. You don't have to trust them if you don't want. :) Other than for upgrades, they're not automatically used, so

Re: System upgrade verification

Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > To upgrade from Fedora-37 to Fedora-38 the instructions > (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/dnf-system-upgrade/) sa > y: >... >5. When the new GPG key is imported, you are asked to verify the key’s >fingerprint. Refer to

Re: Cannot install skypeforlinux

Dario Lesca wrote: > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/dnf-update-failed-skype-gpg-key-expired/81540/3 > > sudo rm /etc/yum.repos.d/skype-stable.repo > rpm -qa gpg-pubkey --qf "gpg-pubkey-%{version}-%{release} %{summary}\n" > sudo rpm -e gpg-pubkey-df7587c3-576a5c23 > sudo rpm -e

Re: Cannot install skypeforlinux

Paul Smith wrote: > Thanks, Doug. I tried as you suggested, but again: > > > [SKIPPED] skypeforlinux_8.97.0.404-1.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded > error: Verifying a signature using certificate > D4040146BE3972509FD57FC71F3045A5DF7587C3 (Skype Linux Client >

Re: kf5-akonadi errors for the last week?

I wrote: > Tom Horsley wrote: >> Usually this sort of stuff clears up in a couple of days, but I've >> been getting these errors for around a week now and wonder if they >> will ever go away? > > An automated "Fails to install" ticket was filed: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2203303 > >

Re: kf5-akonadi errors for the last week?

Tom Horsley wrote: > Usually this sort of stuff clears up in a couple of days, but I've > been getting these errors for around a week now and wonder if they > will ever go away? An automated "Fails to install" ticket was filed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2203303 There's one for rawhide

Re: DMARC and SPF and DKIM, oh, my!

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 17:22 +0930, Tim via users wrote: >> The list server should, of course, be taking anti-spam efforts of its >> own (only allowed authorised members to post through it). > > Just on that point, policies vary: > > 1) Block unsubscribed users > 2)

Re: Messages held for moderation.

Michael Hennebry wrote: > On Tue, 9 May 2023, Joe Zeff wrote: >> On 05/09/2023 04:48 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote: >>> (trim the quoted text down to the most recent/relevant >>> messages only). >> >> This should always be done so that readers don't have

Re: Messages held for moderation.

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2023-05-09 at 18:48 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: >>     The users list maintains a maximum message length of 60 >>     kilobytes; other Fedora lists may have similar length-limits. >>     Remember that thousands of copies of yo

Re: Messages held for moderation.

Joe Zeff wrote: > On 05/09/2023 04:48 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote: >> (trim the quoted text down to the most recent/relevant >> messages only). > > This should always be done so that readers don't have to > plow through dozens of lines from various messages looking

Re: Messages held for moderation.

Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 3:35 PM Todd Zullinger wrote: > I think it would be wise to send a unified message. Don't say one > thing on the Mailing List Guidelines and another in mail messages. Say > the same thing in both places. Yeah, consistency is definitely

Re: Messages held for moderation.

I wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> Yeah, I agree... I don't have time to work on this right now, but can >> add it to my list. Or if you want to submit a PR: >> https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible >> >> There are some lists where we do pass large emails through sometimes. >> For example the

Re: Messages held for moderation.

Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 08:28:30PM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > ...snip... >> >> That could save some time in moderation and make things >> clearer for list members. > > Yeah, I agree... I don't have time to work on this right now, but can

Re: Messages held for moderation.

Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 10:39:39PM +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >> On Mon, 2023-05-08 at 12:50 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: >>>> I just send the canned response which you can configure in >>>> the Mailman settings (I moderate the Evolution

Re: Messages held for moderation.

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Mon, 2023-05-08 at 09:14 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 05:07:18PM +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Monitor the queue, and release valid messages. >>> >>> What makes you think Kevin isn't doing that? >> >> I'll be clear: I do do

Re: Try to reinstall both system fedora and windows 10 from both system broken on a new storage

Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 5/6/23 11:41, Joe Zeff wrote: >> On 05/06/2023 12:25 PM, Tim via users wrote: >> >>> Try a different translator, and/or post in your original language. >> >> If you know two languages, try using your translator to go from one to >> the other and see if it looks right.  If

Re: Messages held for moderation.

George N. White III wrote: > Fedora provides: > > NAME >fpaste - A cli frontend for the >paste.fedoraproject.org pastebin > > SYNOPSIS >fpaste [OPTION]... [FILE]... > > DESCRIPTION >It is often useful to be able to easily paste >text to the Fedora

Re: Messages held for moderation.

Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > I see; the headers to your last message amount to about 10 Kbytes. But I > would have expected that even with headers, a message of about 44 Kbytes > would be under 60 Kbytes. I already trimmed the text size down from > about 53 Kbytes to abpit 44 Kbytes. If you're

Re: nvidia problem F37->F38 update

Tim via users wrote: > On Thu, 2023-05-04 at 16:20 -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > >> I may have another problem but time will tell (running on the newer >> kernel connecting via ssh several times I've walked away and then the >> machine is nonresponsive to ping, have to force power cycle to >>

Re: Messages held for moderation.

Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > I have two messages held for moderation, each reported with the > following message. One of them is 53,454 bytes, the other is  44,018 > bytes. What's going on? > > I would not normally trouble the list about this, but they have been > pending for two days and there

Re: More fun with SSL certificates

Jeffrey Walton wrote: > If OCSP stapling is going to be used, then you should also enable > mod_socache_shmcb: > > a2enmod ssl > a2enmod socache_shmcb > a2enmod rewrite a2enmod is a Debian thing, FWIW. -- Todd signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Post F38 upgrade/fresh install: printing text files via paps (a Postscript converter) prints raw postscript

stan via users wrote: > But, why is this a bug? Stable versions are often at > lower release versions for rpms than newer versions. The bug is that 0.8.0 includes a fix which 0.7.9 lacks. That context was only in the github link which Max posted. Until I read that, I had the same reaction. :)

Re: Post F38 upgrade/fresh install: printing text files via paps (a Postscript converter) prints raw postscript

Max Pyziur wrote: > Working directly with the paps developer on github > (https://github.com/dov/paps/discussions/63) > > We've come across a bug. > > Current F37 version is: > paps-0.7.1-5.fc37 > > Current F38 version is: > paps-0.7.9-1.fc38 > > Latest stable version is > paps-0.8.x > > This

Re: Broken browser? Or broken website...

Felix Miata wrote: > No luck here finding anything to do with Custom or CSS in > NoScript in SeaMonkey. :( This may not help then, but here's what I have in noscript for discussion.fedoraproject.org: https://fedorapeople.org/~tmz/discourse-noscript.png -- Todd signature.asc Description:

Re: Broken browser? Or broken website...

Andre Robatino wrote: > Yep, that was it. Thanks. I was using mozilla-noscript, > and doing what you suggested worked. I've never had to do > that with any other site as I've never seen any other site > appear broken like this one. Yes, discourse is the first time I've run into this type of

Re: Broken browser? Or broken website...

Andre Robatino wrote: > It's hard to describe, but > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org is way too long > vertically and looks like it hasn't loaded fully. There's > a reference above to turning off "use style" but I don't > know what that means or if that has anything to do with > the problem.

Re: f38 upgrade :: rpm signature breakage

Adrian Sevcenco wrote: > Hi! after the update, when i try to use rpm i get: > root@hal: ~ # rpm -qa | grep kernel > error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 230 > Header V4 DSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 3cdbbc71: BAD > Header SHA1 digest: OK > error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 231 > Header

Re: More space needed on the / filesystem to upgrade from F37 to F38

Andras Simon wrote: > If you have enough space in another partition, you can use the > --downloaddir option. I have vague memories of this having solved the > same problem once. Though anyone using --downloaddir should be aware that the directory passed as an option is (or was, when it came up

Re: Power Suspend Automatically On in F38?

Tim Evans wrote: > This was an in-place dnf upgrade. The existing setting in Gnome shouldn't > have been changed, right? The default did change which affects the gdm user. Unless you're logged into a Gnome session on this firewall, it would pick up the new default.

Re: My first f38 bug: uname doesn't work

Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 5:18 PM Todd Zullinger wrote: >> A non-upstream patch was removed¹, which had kept the >> long-deprecated uname -i and -p options. >> >> ¹ https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/coreutils/c/cd953e1 > > uname (1)

Re: My first f38 bug: uname doesn't work

Tom Horsley wrote: > On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 17:49:08 -0400 > Todd Zullinger wrote: > >> s/uname -p/uname -m/ >> >> shouldn't be too much of an issue. > > Right, just have to locate the 47,321 scripts which have some variation > of that command in them. No p

Re: My first f38 bug: uname doesn't work

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > The man page still has '-p' and '-i', so that's at least a > documentation bug. The options are still accepted. They just don't produce the same output they did with a non-upstream patch. Changed output across a major release isn't all that unreasonable -- even if

Re: My first f38 bug: uname doesn't work

Tom Horsley wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189656 > > God knows how many scripts I have that use "uname -p" to get > the architecture name, but it now returns "unknown" instead of > "x86_64". > > I guess I'll replace uname with a script that invokes the real > uname unless

Re: 0 network conection??

ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > # nmcli conn show --active > > NAMEUUID TYPE DEVICE > Wired connection 2 3d30b55f-3675-3e71-88fd-a9796720a9f3 ethernet eno2 > virbr0 5ed314a7-f7d5-4719-9f8a-e144718b6288 bridgevirbr > 0 > >

Re: Certbot error - SOLVED (?)

Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Mike Wright said: >> I don't understand how his logs are accessible to the web. They are >> not under the DocumentRoot. error.log is above it and access.log is >> next to it. Is it somehow possible for a client to reach above / ? > > I didn't look at the

Re: Certbot error

Mike Wright wrote: > I've never seen the port number included as part of the ServerName > directive. Try removing that and give it a go. FWIW, the documented syntax¹ for ServerName is: ServerName [scheme://]domain-name|ip-address[:port] That docs go on to say: If no port is specified

Re: Security context for Apache

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > I've set up a simple web server for private use (though I will enable > https access from outside the network), but I want some of the content > to be outside the default /var/www/html tree. When I do this, I get > file access errors when SElinux is enabled, but not

Re: commands available on bootable iso

Go Canes wrote: > On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 2:16 PM Geoffrey Leach > wrote: >> What I wanted to be able to do is this. I 've downloaded the fedora 37 >> iso. I wan to know if it has gparted. How can I answer that without >> writing it to a thumb drive and booting? > > Assuming the downloaded iso

Re: Problems with New kernel 6.2.7

Joe Zeff wrote: > On 03/24/2023 11:03 AM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: >> Exactly, the 6.2.7 kernel doesn't compile from the akmod. > > A slight correction: the akmod compiles the kernel module, or kmod, not the > kernel itself. However, I'd check with Bugzilla, and if there's not a bug >

Re: where to submit a bug against "xv"?

home user wrote: > "xv" does not handle "webp" images. I do not see "xv" in > the Redhat bugzilla menu of components. Where do I submit > a bug against xv? Running 'rpm -qi xv' or 'dnf info xv' shows that package comes from rpmfusion-nonfree. But I can't imgine anyone at rpmfusion being eager

Re: What is needed to mock build for rhel+epel on Fedora?

Barry Scott wrote: >> On 13 Mar 2023, at 20:15, Richard Shaw wrote: >> Does it have to be RHEL? I've used Alma and Rocky with success. > > Good question. > > If I build for Alma or Rocky will it install on RHEL, > Centos, Oracle Linux etc? > > I picked RHEL as all the others aim to be ABI

Re: What is needed to mock build for rhel+epel on Fedora?

I wrote: > Barry Scott wrote: >> What do I need to setup to allow mock to build for rhel+epel on Fedora? >> >> I'm getting this error: >> >> $ mock -r rhel+epel-8-x86_64 --print-root >> ERROR: /etc/pki/entitlement is not a directory is subscription-manager >> installed? > > I haven't tried

Re: What is needed to mock build for rhel+epel on Fedora?

Barry Scott wrote: > What do I need to setup to allow mock to build for rhel+epel on Fedora? > > I'm getting this error: > > $ mock -r rhel+epel-8-x86_64 --print-root > ERROR: /etc/pki/entitlement is not a directory is subscription-manager > installed? I haven't tried building against RHEL in

Re: chcon

Barry wrote: >> On 7 Mar 2023, at 17:58, Patrick Dupre wrote: >> >> I can run scilab as root user, but as a standard user, I get: >> >> /usr/bin/chcon: failed to change context of >> '/usr/local/scilab/scilab-6.1.1/bin/scilab-bin' to >> ‘unconfined_u:object_r:execmem_exec_t:s0’: Operation not

Re: 37 systemd pulseaudio paradox

Felix Miata wrote: > francis.montag...@inria.fr composed on 2023-03-06 08:01 (UTC+0100): >> This is a user unit. Use thus: systemctl --user cat pulseaudio.service > > Interesting. How would a global configuration change be implemented, since any > edit made for a user who runs it goes into a user

dnf needs-restarting/tracer (was: Re: Taking better advantage of BTRFS)

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sat, 2023-02-25 at 15:43 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote: >> On 2/25/23 14:58, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >>> Now part of the python3-dnf-plugins-core package so you >>> don't need a separate command. With the plugin installed >>> it just runs automatically. >> >> So when

Re: What is wrong with my dnf exclude for wine?

ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > On 2/4/23 08:59, Todd Zullinger wrote: >> I'm not sure you got away with anything. You may not have >> noticed it wasn't working as you had hoped. :) > > Oh I would have noticed instantly. [...] > > I wonder if it was a dnf update I had

Re: What is wrong with my dnf exclude for wine?

ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > On 2/4/23 00:39, Barry wrote: >> >> I always understood that each tag can only appear once. > > Seems I got away with it a lot Multiple excludepkgs entries in dnf.conf don't work in f36 either. Only the last one is used. # rpm -q dnf dnf-4.14.0-1.fc36.noarch #

Re: What is wrong with my dnf exclude for wine?

ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > On 2/2/23 22:29, Samuel Sieb wrote: >> On 2/1/23 21:55, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: >>> What is wrong with my wine dnf excludes? >>> >>> # grep -i wine  /etc/dnf/dnf.conf >>> excludepkgs=wine* >>> excludepkgs=wine-* >>> >>> dnf still tried to upgrade wine >>

Re: time for a new lenovo 12" notebook

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2023-01-04 at 15:14 +, Barry Scott wrote: >> What you seem to be saying is that Evolution will not show you the >> Content-Type: text/plain of a mime encoded email unless you choose >> the >> HTML mail option? >> >> That sounds like a evolution issue? > >

Re: dump/restore?

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > However qcow also allows compression, sparse files, > encryption and copy-on-write snapshots (COW, hence the > name) [...] This is not meant to detract from your well-made point that the qcow2 format provides many benefits over raw filesystem images. :) Tangentially,

Re: genisoimage source

Bill Cunningham wrote: > On 12/11/2022 6:51 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: >> For source rpms you need to setup a ~/.rpmmacros file to tell it >> where to put the unpacked source, then a command like The default is ~/rpmbuild. There's no need to create ~/.rpmmacros unless you need to change the

Re: [OT] regex help

Hola, Mike Wright wrote: > I have a regex I'm trying to build. A match is determined by the contents > of the first two columns. > > if column 1 is a "}" the line is a match > if column 1 is a " " and column 2 is not a " " the line is a match > > Now this seems simple

Re: Firefox and WebAuthn?

Chris Adams wrote: > I can use my Android phone with Google Chrome (connected with Bluetooth) > as a WebAuthn security device. When I try to register a WebAuthn device > with Firefox, I get a pop-up that says: > > wants to register an account with one of your security keys. >You can

Re: lvm2 question

Robert McBroom via users wrote: > Installed the server version of Fedora in a lvm physical > volume. [...] > Quickly started running out of space.  Created a second > physical volume and used vgextend to add it to the volume > group. > > ~]# vgextend fedora_hpz440 /dev/nvme0n1p6 > > Increased

Re: Just noticed strange thing in rkhunter report.

John Horne wrote: > On Fri, 2022-09-30 at 14:05 +1000, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote: >> >> [04:18:49] /usr/libexec/gawk [ Warning ] >> [04:18:49] Warning: Package manager verification has failed: >> [04:18:49] File: /usr/libexec/gawk >> [04:18:49]

Re: encryption and flash based media question

Robert Nichols wrote: > On 9/24/22 9:31 PM, Tim via users wrote: >> On Sat, 2022-09-24 at 11:14 -0500, Robert Nichols wrote: >>> If you follow the recommendation to fill the device with >>> random data first >> >> When was that ever recommended, and where? >> >> While a logical thing to do, I've

Re: Question on Openssl and stunnel??

Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Jul 23, 2022, at 09:29, Michael D. Setzer II via users > wrote: >> >> Saw that Stunnel was updated, but Fedora repo has not >> updated it since issues seem to be windows related. > > If you need a newer version, file a bug in bugzilla: Though it's worth noting

Re: Trying to kickstart a KVM guest on F36

Tom Horsley wrote: > On Mon, 23 May 2022 15:54:28 -0500 > Thomas Cameron wrote: > >> No idea why that worked. > > I had bridges stop working because they disabled the code that > would copy the MAC address from the physical interface attached to > the bridge. Had to add a specific MAC address

Re: rpm erase or removal of rpms

Hi, Bill Cunningham wrote: > I have been trying to use rpm or dnf to remove some rpms. I'd use dnf. It provides a much wider safety net. You can do this with rpm as well, but it requires greater care. > Here is > an example of what I have been trying to do, ex: > >     list.txt, > > >

Re: Shift+PrintScreen gone with F36?

Hello, Frederic Muller wrote: > Something I use almost daily and.. nothing happens now. Is there a > replacement shortcut or a way to enable it back? That's a scary thought. ;) I had to spin up an f36 live image to see for myself. I use Ctrl+Shift+PrintScreen a good bit (to select an area and

Re: ssh impacted by systemd.resolved

Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Kevin Fenzi writes: > >>> That's the first ln -s call in the scriptlet. >>> >>> Now, look at the second one, the one with the -f flag. >> >> Which systemd version are you looking at? > > systemd-249.11-1.fc35.src.rpm > >> bug #2074122 was just recently fixed in >>

Re: ssh infested by systemd.resolved

Tom Horsley wrote: > On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 23:35:35 +0200 > Bob Marcan wrote: > >> Better for users? Are you kidding? >> All this systemd is reinventing the wheel. >> Go back to Windows, when you grow up. > > Nah! It is the first computer fungus, slowly growing over all the rest of > Linux. With

Re: Issue with latest dnf update run - Seems to want micro$oft power shell program?

Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote: > Shows these updates with broken dependences > > nodejsi6861:14.19.0-2.fc34 >updates 199 k > nodejsx86_64 1:14.19.0-2.fc34 >

Re: Rclone issue with Google Drive

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > I would if this were a test version of the RPM, but it > isn't. It's the standard version from the base repo. I may > file a BZ report. It looks to me like that upstream doesn't consider anything but their binaries as official. :( This might be due in whole or in

  1   2   3   4   5   >