> The grammar is not the point at all ... (but it is just as bad in the > origianl notes as in the transcript, I'm afraid) The point is whether we > really think Jeff is adding a great deal to the history of Western > philosophy with all this? Of course the validity of temporality (or not), > the beauty of the oppressed and rejected are noble topics and further, this > is not to suggest there's some sort of elitism about who can make a point or > write anything on a particular subject ... but at the end of the day (upon > which a dog will have his) facile, primary school sentiments are easily > recognisable as just that.
If you buy CDs to be touched deep down inside by the liner notes, you will most likely be disappointed. if you want to read about time and space, get a book by carl sagan or stephen hawking. turn to mills when you want hard techno. I personally think mills is being a bullshit artist because his writings sound a lot like your average guy trying to project intelligence through abstract CD liner rantings. dont get me wrong, he can write whatever he wants on cds and records, and I encourage him to do so. I just know better than to waste my time reading that wankery. remember, time and space = stephen hawking, banging techno = mills. I haven't slept in a while tho so I might just be grouchy :\ -Joe --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
