I imagine this will come in time, but its a very cpu intensive task to be done realtime in software - F/S looks like it probably has enough trouble doing all its current dsp on a PIII. At present vinyl touch classic (www.mixmachines.com) does this but with hardware dsp.
>-----Original Message----- >From: Bulger, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 6:13 PM >To: Jeffrey Paul; Bulger, Tim >Cc: Langsman, Marc; Ian Cheshire; Tristan Watkins; Sakari Karipuro; 313 >Subject: RE: [313] which dj invented + 15 > > >This would work, but why couldn't you dynamically correct the key based >on the amount of pitch? There should be a mathematical function for >determining the amount of skew and correcting it. That way, you could >record everything and the original speed and speed it up/slow it down >without affecting the pitch in real time. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Jeffrey Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:58 AM >To: Bulger, Tim >Cc: 'Langsman, Marc'; 'Ian Cheshire'; 'Tristan Watkins'; Sakari >Karipuro; 313 >Subject: RE: [313] which dj invented + 15 > > >On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Bulger, Tim wrote: > >> I inquired about this and heard nothing back from the Final Scratch >> people. The only digital key correction that I've heard is on the >> Stanton turntables, and it sounds awful. Almost like a >double beat. >> Mixing with it turned on is annoying and difficult. Anything beyond >> +2 irritates people with perfect pitch, +4 or greater starts >sounding >> pretty awkward. > >you could pitch the record up or down when digitizing it (only down >would be functionally effective when recording originally from vinyl, >anyways, for purposes of resolution in the digital copy) and then be >able to pitch it another +/-4 (assumming factory-default decks) when >playing it back with FS... or adjust it digitally with audio-editing >software once you've recorded it (only pitching it up is advisable, at >that point). > >(side note for the gearheads: > >in some of my more nitpicky and/or obsessive moments, i've digitized >tracks that i want really nice copies of at -16 (with the slider set to >+/-16) and then digitally downsampled them (using a nice, high-quality >algorithm in a professional audio-editor) to circa the proper speed. in >my mind it makes for better recordings, but it could be psychosomatic. >it makes any pops or clicks from scratches or deeply-ingrained (that >didn't make it out in the pre-recording wash) dirt less >audible as well. > >) > >-j > >-------------------------------------------------------- > Jeffrey Paul -datavibe- [EMAIL PROTECTED] > aim: x736e65616b phone: 130*21*16749 or 877-748-3467 >-------------------------------------------------------- > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman Brothers. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. All information is subject to change without notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
