Count me out of this coming 'discussion'. I've never made a case for any (faux) sub-genre over any other. Nor anyone's right to like what they like. All I know is crap music and good music. That exists in every genre, time & space.
>-----Original Message----- >From: spw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 3:42 PM >To: Odeluga, Ken; [email protected] >Subject: Re: (313) Every Dog 4 > > >It is my observation there is favoritism towards song based format techno >over track based techno form regular mailing list contributors. >This would explain the interest in pop music, deep house, pre-techno retro >music and a dislike of techno genres such as Swedish techno. > >on 5/9/03 10:05 AM, Odeluga, Ken at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> >> M McQueen >>> what Mills does in this style is better than a lot of the crap out there >>> diluting the market with average techno -- , but I'd rather have fewer >>> tracks that are just... well... more memorable or something. >Or when the >>> "best of Every Dog vols. 1 thru 6" comes out let me know. ;) >I feel like >>> I keep buying the same tracks. That said there are some >standouts, to be >>> sure! >> >> Could I ask whether you don't think there is a utilty for a dj >in *all* the >> tracks of each volume as a whole? (i.e. fewer tracks is fewer to >play with, >> more is greater freedom to be more varied in how you program/mix). >> >> Genuine q fr som1 who's not a dj, only plays records together (sometimes >> well.) >> >> k > >
