-sigh- i knew somebody would get upset about this. i wasn't implying that the music that peacefrog puts out isn't good. nore am i stating that some of these veteran producers (hood, dixon, larkin) don't deserve a solid label to release their music- particualarly at a time when other labels are straight up lowballing them.
But my point was, if there's no promotion behind it, or any real attempt to find new artists, or styles of music, or a wider audience- than their not doing everything they could do to 'progress' the music. i don't have any beef with peacefrog (except maybe that they never send me anything to review). but i have far more respect for labels like kompakt and perlon and ghostly... places that are trying new things and exerting the energy and cost to take chances. On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote: > ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >DOn't see anythign new and exciting coming from Peacefrog. Just > the old > >stand-bys. Notgood for the long run. > > youve got to be kidding. peacefrog does the nearly impossible: > they stay relevant and release mostly timelessly good music. how > is this not good for the long run? not good for the long run is > trend hopping and putting out garbage tunes to be "different". > good music is the most exciting thing you can release. > > tom > > ________________________________________________________________ > andythepooh.com > > > > >
