I go on at 11am - tea is served but I don't want any potspotters standing
around trying to figure out if it's a butterdish or milk pitcher. And just
to remind everyone I don't make ashtrays no matter who requests them. If
you want ashtrays then I'll have to direct you to Oakenfold.
oh yeah, all mugs will be on sale for $5 so make sure you buy one and
support the independents!
throwin' it down
Michael "Arts and Crafts" Elliot-Knight
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
nder.co.uk> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Martin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
03/02/04 10:47 AM cc: "313"
<313@hyperreal.org>, "Brendan Nelson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Ken
Odeluga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Robert Taylor" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>, "Blackman, Ryan \(UKEKT\)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: (313) Mills
you see I knew you had something to hide! now what time are you on and
shall I bring me
goggles just in case you get carried away, like 20 pots in 20mins ? :)
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 02/03/2004 16:33
To: Martin
Cc: 313; Brendan Nelson; Ken Odeluga; Robert Taylor; Blackman,
Ryan (UKEKT); [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (313) Mills
Damn it Martin - I was trying to keep my pot throwing strictly
on the
lowdown and now I'm going to have to go buy a lightbulb to
appease everyone
who now are going to show up at my back shed this weekend
wanting to watch
me on the wheel of clay.
thanks for nuthin'
MEK
Martin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
Robert Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Blackman, Ryan
com> (UKEKT)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Brendan
Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
03/02/04 04:17 AM cc: Ken
Odeluga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 313 <313@hyperreal.org>
Subject: Re:
(313) Mills
But what's the point in doing something if you aren't going to
tell anyone
about it? May as well make pots in a dark shed...
2/3/04 10:19 AM Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Nobody needs to - but many do
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Blackman, Ryan (UKEKT)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 10:18 AM
> To: Robert Taylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Brendan Nelson
> Cc: Ken Odeluga; 313
> Subject: RE: (313) Mills
>
>
> Mills doesn't need to "blatanly self promote".
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 02 March 2004 10:17
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Brendan Nelson
> Cc: Ken Odeluga; 313
> Subject: RE: (313) Mills
>
>
> I can see the point of a commercially available DVD; I just
didn't see
the
> point of him using the DVD in a club, unless he's getting
RSI and needs
the
> odd break. Or is it blatant self-promotion?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 8:09 PM
> To: Brendan Nelson
> Cc: Robert Taylor; Ken Odeluga; 313
> Subject: RE: (313) Mills
>
>
> from a bizznass stand point, DVDs are definately the future
of music
> media. 2003 was the first year that DVDs sold better than
CDs in the US.
> If you walk into any major electronic/music/media store,
you'll see the
> DVDs right in front. and since the pricepoint has now
dropped below $20
> for most DVDs, they're the new impulse buy for people who
would have
> bought CDs just a few years ago.
>
> And while you can pirate a DVD, most people don't have the
HD
> space/connection speed/patients to do it. So I'd expect a
lot more DVDs
> from your favorite DJs in the future.
>
> On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Brendan Nelson wrote:
>
>> I don't know if there's a point as such - it's a bit of a
gimmick,
>> really, that he used to try to build up
anticipation/suspense in
>> the crowd before he came on. But basically it's a product
he's
>> trying to sell and as I've said before I wouldn't mind at
all if
>> more DJs released DVDs like that; the gimmick of using it
at the
>> start of the set is going to wear off pretty quickly
though.
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Robert Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Sent: 01 March 2004 12:13
>>> To: Brendan Nelson; Ken Odeluga; 313
>>> Subject: RE: (313) Mills
>>>
>>>
>>> I still fail to see the point of the DVD thing. Either I'm
>>> stupid, or Mills' explanation for it is rubbish.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Brendan Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 12:07 PM
>>> To: Ken Odeluga; 313
>>> Subject: RE: (313) Mills
>>>
>>>
>>> While Saunderson was better than I expected, it didn't
really
>>> blow me away and like a few other people I was a bit
confused
>>> as to why Mills came on so late - which meant that I was
>>> getting unfairly impatient towards the end of Saunderson's
>>> set. It was effective and crowd-pleasing but nothing
>>> ground-breaking really.
>>>
>>> I was really impressed by Mills, though, I have to say.
Maybe
>>> it's because it's a while since I've seen him, or because
I
>>> was swept up in the spirit of the night, but he seemed to
me
>>> to be very assured and on-form, and he played quite a lot
of
>>> tracks that I hadn't heard before but that were pretty
>>> intriguing; the 909 stuff was pretty rude as well. And
even
>>> though I know this is serious flamebait, I actually think
the
>>> DVD thing at the start worked... *duck!*
>>>
>>> One of the things I worry about sometimes is that the
world
>>> of techno will hit a point where all new music is
basically
>>> schranz and if a DJ is going to really rock the crowd
he/she
>>> will have to basically play ancient classics.
Periodically,
>>> though, you hear a set that helps to persuade you that
>>> there's still development and evolution of the sound going
on
>>> (Surgeon's set at Turnmills a few weeks back sounded like
>>> just that sort of thing actually). So yeah, I thought
Mills
>>> did a really good job and he did exceed my expectations in
>>> all honesty. The 2001 stuff was nice visual dressing but
I'm
>>> not so much of a "visuals" man and didn't really notice it
>>> being "soundtracked" in any particular way... was nice to
>>> look at though!
>>>
>>> Brendan
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Ken Odeluga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Sent: 01 March 2004 11:56
>>>> To: Brendan Nelson; 313
>>>> Subject: RE: (313) Mills
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well what did we all think of Lost then? Especially Mills
and
>>>> Saunderson.
>>>> Come on, let's 'ave opinions ...
>>>>
>>>> k
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Brendan Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 11:45 AM
>>>>> To: 313
>>>>> Subject: RE: (313) Mills
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, it was a pretty surreal moment on Saturday when I
saw that
>>>>> in the magazine! I was on the lookout for a bunch of
Absolutely
>>>>> Fabulous-style fashion journos looking out of their
depth at Lost,
>>>>> but without success...
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Tom Churchill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> Sent: 01 March 2004 11:47
>>>>>> To: 313
>>>>>> Subject: (313) Mills
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did anyone other UK list-members spot the Jeff Mills
mention
>>>>>> in the fashion
>>>>>> pages of the Guardian's Weekend magazine on Saturday?
>>>> Quite amusing:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weekend/story/0,3605,1156729,00.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
##############################################################
>>> #######################
>>> Note:
>>>
>>> Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and
do
>>> not necessarily represent
>>> those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless
>>> specifically stated. This email
>>> and any files transmitted are confidential and intended
>>> solely for the use of the
>>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you
have
>>> received this email in
>>> error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>> Thank You.
>>>
##############################################################
>>> #######################
>>>
>>>
>>
>
############################################################################
> #########
> Note:
>
> Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do
not
necessarily
> represent
> those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless
specifically stated.
> This email
> and any files transmitted are confidential and intended
solely for the
use
> of the
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you
have received
this
> email in
> error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Thank You.
>
############################################################################
> #########
>
>
>
>
******************************************************************************
> *********
> Opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual
and
> not Entergy-Koch Trading Limited or its affiliated
companies.
> This email and any files transmitted with it, including
replies
> and forwarded copies (which may contain alterations)
subsequently
> transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely
for the
> use of the intended recipient. It may contain material
protected by
> attorney-client privilege. If you are not listed on the "To"
or "Cc"
> lines of the original email (or are not the person
responsible for
> delivering to an intended recipient), then you are not an
intended
> recipient and have received this email in error. Any use by
an
> unintended recipient is strictly prohibited.
>
> If you have received this email in error please notify the
IT manager
> by telephone on +44 (0)20 7337 8300 or via email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], attaching this message. Please
> then delete this email and all attachments, and destroy any
copies
> thereof. Thank you.
>
******************************************************************************
> *********
>
>
##############################################################################
> #######
> Note:
>
> Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do
not
necessarily
> represent
> those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless
specifically stated.
This
> email
> and any files transmitted are confidential and intended
solely for the
use of
> the
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you
have received
this
> email in
> error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Thank You.
>
##############################################################################
> #######
>
>
