roger linn is going on, as far as the 60 and 3000 are concerned. the 2000xl shuffle is pretty average but flexible
and the 909 shuffle has bugs, which are great.....try recording a groove in q-base, you´ll see em tiny irregularities -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dinsdag 20 april 2004 12:58 To: Andrew; 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) 909s the 909 swing is unmistakable, same with the MPC swing - 62% baby! -------------- Agreed!! The MPC shuffle/swing quantizing is a viable enough reason to still get one even alongside today's best modern computer sequencers. It shouldn't really be the case, because at the end of the day its just maths! So what's going on here ? The information contained in this e-mail communication is solely intended for the person/legal person to whom it has been sent, and as it may contain information of a personal or confidential nature, it may not be made public by virtue of law, regulations or agreement. If someone other than the intended recipient should receive or come into possession of this e-mail communication, he/she will not be entitled to read, disseminate, disclose or duplicate it. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested to inform the sender of this e-mail message of this immediately, and to destroy the original e-mail communication. Neither Randstad Holding nv nor its subsidiaries accept any liability for incorrect and incomplete transmission or delayed receipt of this e-mail.
