Perhaps some folks play the tracks 'cuz they weren't around during the first
wave of that sort of music.  If they haven't heard anything like it before
it's not hard to believe that this new output could excite them.  

It's always interesting to me that there are people I meet who are really
into something they think is "new" but they are completely unaware of a
previous artist who did something similar.  It happened to me when I first
got into the Orb...I was excitingly playing it for a crusty-hippie-co-worker
I had and I was enthusing on how different and fresh it sounded to me.  He
suggested (with a slightly pained look of a parent trying to correct a
child's bad behavior) that I check out some dub.  Up until that part I never
even knew dub existed.  The Orb's rehashing of something that had already
been done (albeit combined creatively with new elements) set me on a
delightful path of rediscovery.  That's actually one of my favorite elements
of listening to music and why I appreciate labels like Soul Jazz Records so
much...they help me unearth stuff I missed the first time.  

On a related note I get grumpy when artists actually cover a track and don't
bother to acknowledge the original performer...I always see that as a missed
opportunity to educate people on music they're into...granted most of the
bigger acts will at least acknowledge the writing credits or sample credits
but I'd love it if they used some of their booklet space to expound on who
the artist was and why they covered it...imagine if Missy had done something
like the with Clear.  

Though they're not techno, some of you might know BR54-9 or Squirrel Nut
Zippers...they're two acts that rose to some degree of fame by clever
incorporation of OLD material.  When I first heard them I thought they were
so fresh and interesting never realizing that they were trawling through the
back catalogues of obscure country and jazz tunes respectively.  It would
have been nice if they'd worn their influences a little more openly on their
sleeves so I could have had a better context to place their music in.

Whew...sorry, that kind of went on a bit eh?

Leslie

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas D. Cox, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 8:44 AM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) Juan Maclean tracks

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Matt Kane's Brain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>Most people around me spin it as the next revolution in dance
music, the
>punk rock knight that is going to slay the dragon progressive
house once
>and for all.

if i wanted to hear punk, id play my punk records! does anyone
else really care what happens with prog house? i mean its so far
removed from what im into and what i do that i dont think i could
even tell you where to hear some in my own city, though im sure
its out there. maybe people should spend more time making good
music than trying to conquer some nonsense music listened to by a
bunch of jokers. 

i havent heard a single DFA/modern "dance punk" record ive liked.
even that morgan geist rmx of the rapture wasnt a favorite of
mine. im still wondering why people play that !!! "me and
guiliani" cut. ugh, that track is terrible. 

tommmmmmmm 

________________________________________________________________
andythepooh.com


 
                   

Reply via email to