I acctually also want to my view that supports what I said as a seasoned producer and that goes along with autecher's view is that not only is it the person whos making the tack A LARGE and let me repeat A LARGE amount of creit for warmth goes to the person who is matering the final product that makes things sound warm or cold... Ive had tracks mastered by twerk that suddenly went from luck warm to boiling hot.. simply because he knows what he is doing ...
On Sat, 2 Sep 2006, v12 wrote:
show me a 100% pc-made trak that would sound even close to rod modell's deepchord 14 or rhythm n sound's "carrier". speaking of rod - any of his traks on ecchocord. or afx's "blue calx" or "laricheard" or mike parker's "caesura 1" or andres' LP on mahogani/ kdj 29 either you're all joking..or you simply can not hear the elementary difference in sound-detail. i test my hearing once a month in a dedicated lab,and it's bat-good so to speak. the rest is fair - not only i wont support the dull brightness spread around me by thousands of ridiculous labels but i'll take any occcasion to say what i think about it.. i remember autechre's interview in which they said the same as most of you: that it's not the computers' fault, it's the ppl who use it that are responsible for the cold lifeless sound - it would sound much more reasonable if they ever made one vibrant,warm sounding record imo. the stuff i got on warp cassettes ["tri repetae"/"chiastic slide"] appeared to sound miserable on cd and so on blablabla /12
============================ www.phoniq.net releases available on: www.noisefactoryrecords.com publication: www.vagueterrain.net