On 1/9/07, J.T. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
that larry heard/mr white record is soooooo good. instant classic!

both sides are completely ridiculous. i ordered 2 copies to keep one
safe in case something were to happen to the copy ill be hammering out
in every set for the forseeable future. that record is simply
stunning. if i could go back and redo my top X of 06 that might take
top prize.

i think i'm one of the few that isnt excited by marcus mixx...it's kinda 
cool...too
percussive and not enough groove for me...

ive heard the first one in a bunch of mixes ive DLed and ive IDed it
each time to the point where i was just like "i guess this track is
for me". i didnt even listen to the second one, but i appreciate the
small label getting on its feet so i ordered both. i guess that first
one is not necessarily "exciting" but its one of those tracks that can
get into your subconscious and grow there....

is moxie 10 that chow daddy thing? sounded very nice! i assume it's re/edits?

yeah thats the one. and i assume its re-edits or something of the like
as well since that seems to be the moxie way.

it's not new anymore, but did you get that potelea mbali record on stir15? so 
good! even if
it's pretty much just two similar versions of one track...

no i dont think i even saw that around. ill have to go have a listen....

what about the latest arpanet and urban tribe things? already got?

i wasnt feeling those so much. not that they were bad, but i guess i
was looking for something different. im not always in an electro-ish
mood....

as for rhythms, i'm not bothered at all by boom tsk boom tsk. i spend at least 
half my
listening time listening to old classic stuff that has real simple beats like 
that -- albeit
with some snares and claps etc sprinkled on top too usually.

the thing is, as much as i love that minimal chicago trax kind of
aesthetic, it is just like anything else: its made better with lots of
other things around it to contrast that stark beat.

and honestly, i am mostly really really really sick of disco edits, disco 
re-edits, new
disco, etc etc. everybody and their mom trying to sound like disco from 25 
years ago, or
wishing they were at cosmic, and ignoring all the dance music that's came since 
in their
dj-ing and listening habits. i love disco, and there's some good new stuff, but 
loads and
loads of filler, and i feel like it's really clamping down on new good original 
house music
the same way that minimal stuff is on good new techno. stop the homogenization
pleeeease!

i cant agree more. my man curt is way into the scandanavian disco
thing, and i find it more crap than the minimal stuff for the most
part. the redits are way out of control, ive generally only bought
ones from a few camps because theyre the best of them: ugly edits,
editions disco, and moxie. i used to read the dj history board but now
i find i can barely tolerate their attitude. that said, some people i
know have been doing some mixes inspired by the cosmic thing that i
find to be more interesting than the actual original mixes by baldelli
and the like. the obsession with ridiculous records seemingly just
because theyre "rare" (the osmonds are not funky!) in that scene is
really annoying as well.

im really dying for more good new music. going digging is fun, and ill
always enjoy it but its not a substitute for new sounds. the problem
is that all the genres ive loved in my life seem completely creatively
bankrupt and the newer genres havent been doing it for me either. i
feel like soon there has to be a real substantial shift in music
overall, im waiting for it.

in the meantime, ive been trying to look for more older stuff that i
like, been digging alot of jazz recently and some 90s house (got some
nice strictly rhythm joints recently, one of the Logic 12"s and
barbara tucker "i get lifted" as well as some nice maxi 12"s: pal joey
as "espresso", sagat "f*ck dat", cevin fisher "the way we used to",
etc). and in general ive been feeling hiphop and soul music alot more
than usual, thats been dictating alot of my listening....

tom

Reply via email to