On 10/9/07, klaus boss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You're obviously everso entitled to your opinions :) > But in what way other than the dubplate exclusives has Dubstep followed D'n'B?
it went from a "soulful" sound that referenced jazz, r+b, hiphop, reggae, etc to a cold technical sound. it seriously is almost an exact parallel to jungle moving to techstep. and of course of hardcore moving to "darkside". its just the path that UK dance genres seem to take. > Yes, for being an innovative musical path (which D'n'B killed off for > good around 96 and Detroit Techno is hardly any better there!!! > although I'll love it to my deathbed for the amazing music that was > created) i think detroit techno has maintained its goodness far better than DnB did. with jungle it just dropped off entirely. unless youre the most cold hearted cynic out there, if you were a fan of the original detroit techno records, you can still find records from detroit that you would like. > Is it possibly due to an inborn dislike to something that actually > evolves and why the hell should sampling be a problem in the process > of being creative? :) i dont mind evolution. there is just a point where these UK genres quit being about creativity and things all start sounding samey and dark and boring. > As a whole I'd say that DUBSTEP (stupid name, but I like it to be > typed as big as possible ;) ) can be as much enjoyed at home as in a > smoky, dark club. im just not too sure about that. > Don't fear the future, embrace it. The Future Is Ours - Musto & Bones i only fear the future if it sucks like dubstep. tom
