Gains on the back are to stop IDIOT DJs turning them up and destroying sound
systems. 






Alan Heneghan

 



> From: Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:36:48 +1000
> To: 'list 313' <313@hyperreal.org>
> Subject: RE: (313) votes
> 
> Doesn't the 32 have the gains on the back so you literally have to blindly
> reach behind the mixer? Completely impractical.
> 
> For fast and aggressive EQing and x/channel fading the Pioneer is far more
> sturdy than A&H I find. For smooth, delicate mixing the 62 wins hands down.
> This is comparing a 600 with a 62.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benoît Pueyo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 24 October 2007 6:25 AM
> To: list 313
> Subject: Re: (313) votes
> 
> I have A&H XONE 32. Except the fact it has 3 channels, it already beats
> every pionner I got in hands (300,500,600) though i've never tried the 800.
> 
> Anyways I dont think Pioneer have changed thier stupid EQs cutting
> everything when you low too much the bass. A&H are soft, precise, and
> still have punchy efft. Hooray for the filters aswell.
> 
> So forget Pioneer... Now between 62 and 92 I would say 62 becasue its
> cheaper, and for the extra $$$ 92 doesnt bring much more technically
> talking (except if youre fan of all these hawtinesque concetual effects
> and stuff).
> -- 
> Benoît.
> 
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
>> 
>> can I have your votes pls..?
>> 
>> Allen & Heath 62
>> Allen & Heath 92
>> Pioneer DJM 800
>> 
>> ?
>> 

Reply via email to