i'm not an audio engineer, nor do i play one on the internet, but wouldn't proper preamp limiting/compression solve this problem just as well?
On 10/24/07, Alan Heneghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gains on the back are to stop IDIOT DJs turning them up and destroying sound > systems. > > > > > > > Alan Heneghan > > > > > > > From: Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:36:48 +1000 > > To: 'list 313' <313@hyperreal.org> > > Subject: RE: (313) votes > > > > Doesn't the 32 have the gains on the back so you literally have to blindly > > reach behind the mixer? Completely impractical. > > > > For fast and aggressive EQing and x/channel fading the Pioneer is far more > > sturdy than A&H I find. For smooth, delicate mixing the 62 wins hands down. > > This is comparing a 600 with a 62. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Benoît Pueyo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, 24 October 2007 6:25 AM > > To: list 313 > > Subject: Re: (313) votes > > > > I have A&H XONE 32. Except the fact it has 3 channels, it already beats > > every pionner I got in hands (300,500,600) though i've never tried the 800. > > > > Anyways I dont think Pioneer have changed thier stupid EQs cutting > > everything when you low too much the bass. A&H are soft, precise, and > > still have punchy efft. Hooray for the filters aswell. > > > > So forget Pioneer... Now between 62 and 92 I would say 62 becasue its > > cheaper, and for the extra $$$ 92 doesnt bring much more technically > > talking (except if youre fan of all these hawtinesque concetual effects > > and stuff). > > -- > > Benoît. > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : > >> > >> can I have your votes pls..? > >> > >> Allen & Heath 62 > >> Allen & Heath 92 > >> Pioneer DJM 800 > >> > >> ? > >> > > -- peace, frank dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com
