Dear Samita,

Thanks for you support of the use-case document, and your valuable comments.
LC is an "logical entity" for local data aggregation, status
management of local nodes, etc.
It is not a router, but in mesh-under, such a local control point can
be also used for data forwarding for the neighbors.
However, it is highly dependant on deployment decision to set seperate
nodes for seperate roles. Thus, I think that specifying such a detail
role is out of scope of use-case document.
LC was defined for explaining deployment scenarios for nodes with a
role of management of local information.
If the wording is not clear, would you please suggest some changes?

Thanks again.

Eunah

On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Samita Chakrabarti
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have done a brief review. The document looks good!
>
> One question/comment: The document enlists LC(Local Controller) in the
> diagrams in several examples. But its definition is unclear whether LCs are
> only controllers or they are aggregator routers or LRs or a combination of
> all or one of them in logical form.
> There might be some room for more clarification on LC definition of terms.
>
> Thanks,
> -Samita
>
>>
>> > LoWPANners,
>> >
>> > as you know, the working group chairs dropped the ball on the usecases
>> > document.
>> > A version with fixes resulting from the WGLC issued on 2009-01-09 was
>> > submitted on 2009-10-02. We wanted to get some quick feedback on
>> > whether that was fixing the issues and then never actually issued the
>> > second working-group last call.  Indeed, the Internet-Draft expired
>> > after six months...  Then the terminology of the ND draft changed.
>> > Since the usecases draft now has been resubmitted with updated
>> > terminology:
>> >
>> > This is a Working-Group Last-Call for:
>> >
>> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lowpan-usecases-06
>> >
>> > The document is intended to be submitted by this Working Group to the
>> > IESG for publication as an Informational Document.
>> >
>> > This is a one-week Working-Group Last-Call, ending on 2010-08-09
>> > (Monday, August 09, 2010) at 2359 UTC.
>> >
>> > Please review the document carefully (one last time), and send your
>> > comments to the 6lowpan list.  Please also indicate in your response
>> > whether or not you think this document is ready to go to the IESG.
>> >
>> > Carsten and Geoff
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > 6lowpan mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 6lowpan mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6lowpan mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
>
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan

Reply via email to