Hi, On Nov 9, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Geoff Mulligan wrote:
> Eunah, > Thanks for taking care of these editorial comments. > > The document is certainly nearly ready to go to the IESG and the > shepherd document is complete. There are a couple of "nits" that need > to be addressed before I can send it to our ADs. Enuah, I will send you > the list of "nits" in my next message. > > Additionally, I was informed last night (thanks Jonathan and Pete) that > I had not answered a number of messages from JP about this document. It > would appear that in my move to use Google to filter my email, it > (Google) decided to categorize all of JP's messages to me as SPAM - I > think that I've corrected that situation. This message should answer > JP's questions regarding the status of the document. In the future, > remember that there are two WG Chairs, if for some reason I'm not > responding to a message. Ah thanks for the clarifications, I was wondering why you were not responding most emails for several years now ... you may want to check since I've been told that others had the same issue ... :-) > > geoff > > On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 20:56 +0100, Eunsook "Eunah" Kim wrote: >> Dear Paul, >> >> First of all, I'm very sorry for the late responding. >> I highly appreciate on your detail comments. >> I just uploaded the new version fixing the editorial errors you commented. >> You will find the new version at >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lowpan-usecases/ >> >> Thanks again for the valuable review. >> >> Best Regards, >> Eunah >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Paul Chilton <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> I think the draft is well written and contains valuable information. It >>> should be submitted to the IESG after the following editorial changes are >>> made: >>> >>> Nits >>> P1, L24 r/characterisitcis/characteristics >>> P1, L24 r/dimention/dimension >>> P4, L24 "...details of the each..." - remove "each" >>> P4, L35 r/arbitary/arbitrary >>> P9, L30 r/boold/blood >>> P10, L30 "In case that..." - replace with "In the case that..." >>> P10, L39 "In Mesh Under, more than one LMs are selected for multi-hop >>> transmission and the nodes MAY also play role in transmission multi-point >>> traffic (multicast) by unicast method, not only role in data collection." >>> Sentence is unclear >>> P11, L7 "The data volume is usually not so big in this case, but data is >>> sensitive for delay." replace with "The volume of data volume is usually not >>> large in this case, but is sensitive to delay." >>> P11, L23 "In case..." replace with "In the case..." >>> P11, L25 r/typle/type >>> P12, L25 "such as fire alarm" add "such as a fire alarm" >>> P12, L25 "...MUST be handled in very critical manner." replace with "...MUST >>> be handled in a very critical manner. " >>> P12, L38 "...do not move..." replace with "...are immobile..." >>> P13, L50 r/acheived/achieved >>> P15, L31 remove "...of the Grid network..." >>> P15, L46 "...a few dozen of nodes..." remove "of" >>> P16, L52 "...LBR provides connectivities to the outside of LoWPAN..." >>> replace with "...LBR provides connectivity to the outside world..." >>> P17, L37 r/LoPWAN/LoWPAN >>> P21, L52 r/failure/fails >>> Regards >>> Paul >>> >>> Paul Chilton >>> Low Power RF Solutions (formerly Jennic Ltd) >>> NXP Semiconductors NV >>> Furnival Street, Sheffield, S1 4QT, UK >>> Tel: +44 114 281 2655 >>> Fax: +44 114 281 2951 >>> Comp Reg No: 3191371 Registered In England >>> http://www.nxp.com http://www.jennic.com >>> ____________________________________________ >>> >>> >>> Carsten Bormann wrote: >>> >>> LoWPANners, >>> as you know, the working group chairs dropped the ball on the usecases >>> document. >>> A version with fixes resulting from the WGLC issued on 2009-01-09 was >>> submitted on 2009-10-02. We wanted to get some quick feedback on >>> whether that was fixing the issues and then never actually issued the >>> second working-group last call. Indeed, the Internet-Draft expired >>> after six months... Then the terminology of the ND draft changed. >>> Since the usecases draft now has been resubmitted with updated >>> terminology: >>> This is a Working-Group Last-Call for: >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lowpan-usecases-06 >>> The document is intended to be submitted by this Working Group to the >>> IESG for publication as an Informational Document. >>> This is a one-week Working-Group Last-Call, ending on 2010-08-09 >>> (Monday, August 09, 2010) at 2359 UTC. >>> Please review the document carefully (one last time), and send your >>> comments to the 6lowpan list. Please also indicate in your response >>> whether or not you think this document is ready to go to the IESG. >>> Carsten and Geoff >>> _______________________________________________ >>> 6lowpan mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> 6lowpan mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> 6lowpan mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan > > > _______________________________________________ > 6lowpan mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
