On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 08:47:18PM +0000, John Chambers wrote:
> 
> 
> The main problem with making such a suggestion is that most
> of  the  suggestions I've gotten for enhancements have been
> based on the assumption that I have all the abc sitting  on
> the disk.  This isn't true. My Tune Finder doesn't save any
> tunes from the (275 now) other sites  where  it  finds  abc
> files.   It saves the URL and a few header lines.  When you
> make a request for a PS or GIF or MIDI version of  a  tune,
> it  connects  to  the  remote site, downloads the abc file,
> extracts the tune, and converts it on  the  fly.   Anything
> that  requires  searching through the tune collection would
> take several days.  Even a limited search of  another  site
> could take many, many minutes.  I have avoided implementing
> anything that requires more than just downloading a  remote
> file.  And my database is now up to around 60 MB, on a free
> "guest" account.  The folks at the MIT  EE  department  are
> supportive so far (and some of them are folk musicians ;-),
> but I do need to be somewhat careful of how much of a  disk
> hog I become.

Just out of interest, how long do you guess it would take to
actually grab all the ABC you're indexing (and how big would it
be) ... do it once and it would speed searching through them up.

The problem of which, apart from resources, is cacheing obsolete
versions ... maybe a protocol, or convention, or something, for
grab-an-ABC-*if*-it's-changed, would be useful ?

-- 
Richard Robinson
"The whole plan hinged upon the natural curiosity of potatoes" - S. Lem

To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html

Reply via email to