Hi,
El 23/04/2015 a las 13:43, Gert Doering escribió:
... and the community is free to declare that "Make another LIR and move
resources to old LIR (right away)" is considered abuse of the last /8
policy, and dis-incentivize it...
Sure we are. But I always have seen a problem with this kind of
proposals and the community.
The problem is that lot of members of the community are IP
Trader/Broker/Sellers so, a policy such this one are VERY GOOD for them
while is VERY BAD for the new lirs that only hold a /22.
The community should be objetive, and Im pretty sure it isnt.
Why Elvis, a well know IP Broker from V4Escrow, proposed this instead of
"Unused space should be returned to RIPE"???
Did the community think about if all the offers in the Listing Service
are reclaimed from RIPE, the IPv4 Exhaustion "dissapear"?
Why nobody in the community proposed it?
Regards,
--
Daniel Baeza
Centro de Observación de Red
Dpto. Red y Sistemas
Television Costa Blanca S.L.
Telf. 966.190.847 | Fax. 965.074.390
http://www.tvt.es | http://www.tvt-datos.es
Correo: [email protected]
--
[Atención] La información contenida en este e-mail es confidencial,
privilegiada y está dirigida exclusivamente a su destinatario.
Cualquier revisión, difusión, distribución o copiado de este mensaje
sin autorización del propietario está prohibido. Si ha recibido este
e-mail por error por favor bórrelo y envíe un mensaje al remitente.
[Disclaimer] The information contained in this e-mail is privileged and
confidential and is intended only for its addressee.
Any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is
prohibited.
If you have received it in error please delete the original message and
e-mail us.
(!) El medio ambiente es responsabilidad de todos.
Imprime este mail si es absolutamente necesario.
