On Mon, 11 May 2015, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
As Nick states, "I'd be interested to see a real life addressing plan which needed more than this amount of bit space." I'd actually be interested to see a real life addressing plan that needed a /32 bit address space, where the need isn't constructed based on the mere possibility of getting that space instead of merely e.g. a few hundre million times of the entire IPv4 space. -- Jan
Since it's perfectly valid to ask for /48 per customer, with companies having tens of millions of customers, it's not a problem to motivate larger than /29.
The proposed change doesn't change this at all as far as I can tell. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected]
