On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 03:58:46PM +0200, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
As Nick states, "I'd be interested to see a real life addressing plan which
needed more than this amount of bit space." I'd actually be interested to
see a real life addressing plan that needed a /32 bit address space, where
the need isn't constructed based on the mere possibility of getting that
space instead of merely e.g. a few hundre million times of the entire IPv4
space.
The way I read the proposal, it is not about assignment sizes but
about a "aggregation" vs "conservation" conflict.
The proponents have, AIUI, a problem where they might not fully
assign a /32 or /29 allocation but have different routing
policies for parts of their network, which cannot be satisfied
without violating s3.4 of ripe-641.
rgds,
Sascha Luck
