On 11/05/2015 16:36, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Mon, 11 May 2015, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote: >> As Nick states, "I'd be interested to see a real life addressing plan >> which needed more than this amount of bit space." I'd actually be >> interested to see a real life addressing plan that needed a /32 bit >> address space, where the need isn't constructed based on the mere >> possibility of getting that space instead of merely e.g. a few hundre >> million times of the entire IPv4 space. -- Jan > > Since it's perfectly valid to ask for /48 per customer, with companies > having tens of millions of customers, it's not a problem to motivate larger > than /29. > > The proposed change doesn't change this at all as far as I can tell.
this is already catered for in the existing policy, though. Nick
