On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 02:00:40PM +0200, Marco Schmidt wrote: > > Dear colleagues, > > A proposed change to the RIPE Document "IPv6 Address Allocation and > Assignment Policy" now is open for discussion. > > The proposal aims to expand the criteria for evaluating initial IPv6 > allocations larger than a /29. The RIPE NCC would consider additional aspects > beyond only the number of existing users and extent of the organisation's > infrastructure. > > You can find the full proposal at: > > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-03 > > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to > <[email protected]> before 27 May 2015. > > Regards > > Marco Schmidt > Policy Development Officer > RIPE NCC > >
Having listened to the rationale in person for this proposal I would give tentative support to this proposal on the basis that the request provides appropriate justification. I also agree with Benedict's comment on the mic about ensuring that the allocation is required to be so large by virtue of an address plan for instance. Regards, Mick -- Mick O'Donovan | Network Engineer | BT Ireland | Website: http://www.btireland.net Looking Glass: http://lg.as2110.net Peering Record: http://as2110.peeringdb.com AS-SET Macro: AS-BTIRE | ASN: 2110
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
