Hi Jan, > I'd actually be interested to see a real life addressing plan that needed a > /32 bit address space, where the need isn't constructed based on the mere > possibility of getting that space instead of merely e.g. a few hundre million > times of the entire IPv4 space.
Giving significantly more than a single /64 to a single (home) user is part of the way IPv6 was designed. A /48 was a standard size from RFC 3177. It's successor RFC6177 is the current BCP. When working according to that BCP a /32 and even a /29 is really not that much. If you don't agree with an RFC/BCP then this is not the place to deal with that... Cheers, Sander
