On 13.05.2015 11:43, Mick O Donovan wrote: > Having listened to the rationale in person for this proposal I would > give tentative support to this proposal on the basis that the request > provides appropriate justification.
At this point I want to mention, that NCC-Staff is doing (and have always been doing) a very good job reviewing requests for resources. And although I was kind of p*ssed on one or another request back because of not good enough formulated justification, I am happy that they did it. Thanks for this! For the ones asking for more conservation: I know a bunch of LIRs who received a /29, as /29 currently does not need any justification. I also know that those LIR will never ever use more than a /48 or /40 ... so if we care that much about conservation now, I am sure that those few (we are currently talking about 10 Requests and about 45 currently allocated <= /28) requesters of larger V6-Space are nothing against the amount of /29 assignments which will never be used. Best regards -- Jens Ott Opteamax GmbH Simrockstr. 4b 53619 Rheinbreitbach Tel.: +49 2224 969500 Fax: +49 2224 97691059 Email: [email protected] HRB: 23144, Amtsgericht Montabaur Umsatzsteuer-ID.: DE264133989
