Mads Toftum wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 09:04:11PM +0900, Jim Grisanzio wrote: > >> (1) Core Contributor -- Nominated by a Core Contributor, three +1 votes, >> no -1 votes, duration within five days, only CCs can vote. >> > > I can't really see much harm in letting Contributors nominate as well as > long as you keep the 3 Core Contributor votes requirement. > >> (2) Contributor -- Self nominated or nominated by a Contributor or Core >> Contributor, no -1 votes, no minimum or maximum +1 votes, duration >> within five days, only CCs can vote. >> >> > This seems a bit odd to me. Effectively you can nominate yourself and > slip under the radar if nobody hates you enough to vote no? Well, if you put it that way ... :)
> I think it > would be more "balanced" if you changed this to mirror the procedure in > (1) and just extended it to accept nominations/votes from Contributors. > Ok, that's a good suggestion to open it up a bit. > >> (3) Project and/or User Group -- Proposal based on the new format below, >> one +1 vote, no -1 votes, duration within five days, only CCs can vote. >> >> > This one looks fine - getting many people to vote for user groups in > places they've never heard of is probably too big of a requirement. > I'm much less concerned about the Contributor and Core Contributor voting, but we do need to make getting UGs easier and faster. So, cool... Jim -- Jim Grisanzio http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris --
