On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 21:04 +0900, Jim Grisanzio wrote:
> hey ... how's this for a simpler voting and project proposal process
> for Advocacy? Just for discussion. Once we decide, I'll update the pages
> ....
If we made this process-exception so that it was specific to new
user-group creations, I think it's great.
( we want to encourage user groups to start, and a more streamlined
process just for them sounds about right )
Other non-user group projects I think should still have a more rigorous
process in order to form an official project. There may be advocacy
projects we'd want to prevent from starting (hypothetical example, "The
OpenSolaris 'Linux Sux' Advocacy project")
cheers,
tim
> (1) Core Contributor -- Nominated by a Core Contributor, three +1 votes,
> no -1 votes, duration within five days, only CCs can vote.
>
> (2) Contributor -- Self nominated or nominated by a Contributor or Core
> Contributor, no -1 votes, no minimum or maximum +1 votes, duration
> within five days, only CCs can vote.
>
> (3) Project and/or User Group -- Proposal based on the new format below,
> one +1 vote, no -1 votes, duration within five days, only CCs can vote.
>
> Advocacy Project/UG Proposal Format
>
> * Name of project or user group.
> * A minimum of three initial participants listed with their
> OpenSolaris user IDs.
> * A one-paragraph description of the project or user group, which
> should include the location and activities planned for user groups
> and problems to solve for projects.
>
>
> Jim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Solaris Engineering Ops
http://blogs.sun.com/timf
