Ok, based on the feedback I updated this voting proposal. I didn't see 
anyone really objecting, so I took all the suggestions as best as I 
could resolve them. I did make changes to clarify, so check me and see 
what you think ...


Voting Procedures for the Advocacy Community Group

The Advocacy CG voting procedures are based on the OpenSolaris 
Constitution and the OpenSolaris Governing Board's Project Instantiation 
Policy and cover the following areas: Participant, Contributor, Core 
Contributor, User Group Proposals, Project Proposals. Questions should 
be directed to advocacy-discuss.

   1. Participant: Register on opensolaris.org and advocacy-discuss and
      participate in community conversations.

   2. Contributor: To earn Contributor status you need to be nominated
      by a Contributor or Core Contributor. You also need a total of two
      +1 votes and no -1 votes. Only Core Contributors can vote, and
      voting is open on advocacy-discuss for five days. The initial
      nomination is considered a +1 vote.

   3. Core Contributor: To earn Core Contributor status you need to be
      nominated by a Core Contributor. You also need a total of three +1
      votes with no -1 votes. Only Core Contributors can vote, and
      voting is open on advocacy-discuss for five days. The initial
      nomination is considered a +1 vote.

   4. User Groups: To get user group infrastructure on opensolaris.org,
      you need to send a proposal to advocacy-discuss for approval. You
      need one +1 vote and no -1 votes. Only Core Contributors can vote,
      and voting is open on advocacy-discuss for five days. Write your
      proposal in the following format:

         1. Name of user group.
         2. Three or more initial participants listed with their
            OpenSolaris user IDs.
         3. A one paragraph description of the group, including location
            and activities planned.

   5. Projects: Project proposals follow the OGB's Project Instantiation
      Policy.


Am I getting closer to a reasonable solution here?

Thanks,

Jim
-- 
Jim Grisanzio http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris

Reply via email to