On Feb 14, 2008 2:02 PM, Jim Grisanzio <Jim.Grisanzio at sun.com> wrote:
> Shawn Walker wrote:
> > *disclaimer: just reading from the constitution; not my personal view*
> >
> > It looks like your proposed procedures fit within the guidelines, but
> > I just wanted to point out that the constitution has some pre-defined
> > limitations on voting.
> >
> > *end disclaimer*
> >
> > According to Article VIII, Section 8.4 of the constitution, the
> > following procedure is to be used for Core Contributor additions:
> >
> > Consensus
> >
> > At least three (3) binding +1 votes and no -1 votes (i.e., unanimous
> > with a minimal quorum of three votes).
> >
> > Putbacks (when subjected to vote). Initiate new project. Terminate
> > project. Addition of Core Contributor. Removal of Core Contributor
> > (subject must abstain).
> >
> > From:
> > http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/ogb/governance/#ARTICLE_VIII.__Community_Group_Voting_Procedures
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> hey ...
>
> Yep. We've been trying to follow those guidelines specifically. And I
> would agree with most of them, but I want to make it easier to propose
> and get approval for a UG project/list. The OGB's Project Instantiation
> Policy provides the flexibility we need:
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/ogb/policies/project-instantiation.txt

Yes, and it is really great to see a CG fulfill this need!

I really wasn't trying to put a damper on anything, just wanted to
remind folks that our constitution actually provides some guidance in
this area.

> Also, just from a language perspective, the Constitution and the Project
> Instantiation Policy are difficult documents to read and understand for
> many people because English is their second language.  So, at the very
> least the text explaining all this needs to be substantially shorter and
> easier, but the process should change to be easier too. I'm ok with
> keeping a high bar to be a CC, but not to get a UG.

I think the Advocacy CG serves as a great role model for every CG.

Its great to see some documents making the process simple.

I've wished for a simple guide to the whole process many times.

Three cheers (beers? :)) for this CG!

-- 
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/

"To err is human -- and to blame it on a computer is even more so." -
Robert Orben

Reply via email to