Yes. And I bet a lot of WISPs comply by using some copy-pasta from
someone else's website and just change the name. Big providers will
comply by having the disclosure /somewhere/ on their website but buried
under a nest of links that nobody will follow.
Most consumers will be too lazy to find these factual disclosures, and
the ones that do seek them will have trouble finding them, and the ones
that find something will find boiler-plate wishy washy legalese saying
"I'll manage my network both neutrally and also however I want to".
</cynicism>
On 12/11/2019 10:21 AM, Steve Jones wrote:
THis is a shot across the bow to us though to get with the program.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 9:20 AM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
<mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I think in my 15 years here, maybe two customers read the terms of
service, and probably only one of them would read the disclosure
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 9:03 AM Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com
<mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I doubt any consumers are making choices based on legally
mandated disclosures.
....but I can't claim to understand humans.
On 12/11/2019 8:04 AM, can...@believewireless.net
<mailto:can...@believewireless.net> wrote:
I thought this was odd: " By failing to comply with the
Transparency Rule, the Company has deprived consumers of
critical information that must be available when selecting
Internet service in the marketplace. As the Commission has
previously stated, clear disclosures help consumers make
well-informed choices about their purchase and use of
broadband Internet access services."
If you were comparing ISPs based on their disclosures and the
one you were looking at didn't have one, wouldn't you just
move onto the next provider? If they are the only provider
available, would it really matter then?
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
