said nobody who uses *nix daily ever :)
Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com>
On 09/17/2014 04:33 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:
nobody wants a text based config file, its just a passing fad
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Bill Prince via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:
Paul, Paul, Paul,
You know I have been asking for all of these for some time. IIRC, the
text-based config file might go back to circa 2006.
bp
On 9/17/2014 4:37 PM, Paul Conlin via Af wrote:
If you really want to know this Bill, why didn't you ask for it earlier?
Why spring this on Cambium all of a sudden? Do you expect them to read
your
mind?!
PC
Blaze Broadband
-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:af-bounces+pconlin=blazebroadband....@afmug.com] On
Behalf
Of Bill Prince via Af
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 7:32 PM
To: Motorola III
Subject: [AFMUG] Dear Cambium
Please let us know if:
1. The femtocell fix is in the pipe (or not) 2. There will be a trap
on
NAT table full, or
at least an OID that
shows the number of entries in the NAT table 3. As an alternative
to
#2, perhaps a
way to limit the number of MAC
addresses allowed behind an SM
4. A text-based configuration file
5. A "do this timing" that lets us just set an AP to match some other
AP as closely as possible by specifying the appropriate frame
dimensions (or maybe just the other APs IP address (now that would
be cool)
TNX
--
bp
