We will be on the Farm too!

-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:af-bounces+ray.savich=cambiumnetworks....@afmug.com] On Behalf 
Of Chuck McCown via Af
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 12:09 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Dear Cambium

Only if WISPAPALOOZA comes to AnimalFarm too!

-----Original Message-----
From: Ray Savich via Af
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 11:04 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Dear Cambium

Dear Animal Farm,
Make plans to attend the Open House at WISPAPALOOZA, Monday Oct 13th at 2PM. 
Come and see what's new.
Register to attend at http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/wispapalooza_openhouse
Ray

-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:af-bounces+ray.savich=cambiumnetworks....@afmug.com] On Behalf 
Of Bill Prince via Af
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 10:12 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Dear Cambium

I have three things to say to that:

O


                     M


                                             G




bp

On 9/18/2014 8:00 AM, Aaron Schneider via Af wrote:
> Hi Bill -
>
> 1) coming in 13.2
> 2) coming in 13.2, NAT table size is configurable from 1024 - 8192 
> entries, there is a configuration OID,  and will be a current table 
> size oid
> 3) possibly coming in 13.3, can't promise that yet
> 4) coming in 13.3, planning to have something at WISPAPALOOZA to demo, 
> more than just a config file.  I sent some information about this 
> awhile back.
> 5) we are working on an external frame calc tool but not sure of the 
> timeline of that.   Will make sure to add this idea to that list (point to 
> an AP to use as a "starting point").
>
> I'll send more details on #4 soon and we will be publishing the config 
> file format.
>
> Regards,
>
> -Aaron
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Af 
> [mailto:af-bounces+aaron.schneider=cambiumnetworks....@afmug.com]
> On Behalf Of Bill Prince via Af
> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 6:31 PM
> To: Motorola III
> Subject: [AFMUG] Dear Cambium
>
>
> Please let us know if:
>
>   1. The femtocell fix is in the pipe (or not)  2. There will be a 
> trap on NAT table full, or at least an OID that
>      shows the number of entries in the NAT table  3. As an 
> alternative to #2, perhaps a way to limit the number of MAC
>      addresses allowed behind an SM
>   4. A text-based configuration file
>   5. A "do this timing" that lets us just set an AP to match some other
>      AP as closely as possible by specifying the appropriate frame
>      dimensions (or maybe just the other APs IP address (now that would
>      be cool)
>
> TNX
>
>
> --
> bp
>
>

Reply via email to