Traco Charge Controller & Power supply.

TSP-BCM48
TSP 360–148


Regards,
Chuck

On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Gino Villarini via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:

>  What are u using?
>
> Sent from Marconi's and Graham Bell's fused thoughts!!!
>
>
> On Oct 4, 2014, at 11:02 AM, Chuck Hogg via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:
>
>   To be clear, we don't use something like an APC UPS.  We do a battery
> array with a charge controller.
>
> Regards,
> Chuck
>
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Vince West via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:
>
>> Kade,
>>
>>  I can't speak on the fiber, because we have used a few different kinds
>> over the builds we have done. My favorite has been bend insensitive fiber.
>> It is small and can make the same turns the Ethernet and power can without
>> risking a break. It is also really thin and makes for easier movement when
>> securing the cable.
>>
>>  In terms of the PacketFlux gear in the air, if the site is done
>> properly and grounded, there shouldn't be any problems. I have only had to
>> replace two of them since we started building our larger sites out like
>> this. The list Gerard gave is missing two items I believe: breakers and
>> fuses. More often than not, the fuses on the ground are the ones that go.
>> We have one site where our box is 360ft on the tower. This site almost
>> always suffers some kind of issue in major lightning storms. It trips a
>> breaker at the base. The drive out is 20 minutes and worth while compared
>> to having to climb the tower when the storm is over.
>>
>>  We do not use UPSs anymore on the large deployments. The DC box stays
>> on the ground because the power line going up the tower is either fused or
>> has it's own DC breaker. We also have a site monitor at the base to monitor
>> voltage levels on the batteries and we can graph the stats to troubleshoot
>> in the future. Because we use a breaker or fuse in our DC system going from
>> the top to the bottom, it would be a pain to still have to climb to replace
>> a fuse if necessary.
>>
>>  Vince West
>> Tower Hand
>> Technical Support
>> Shelby Broadband
>> 148 Citizens Blvd
>> Simpsonville, KY 40067
>> Phone: 1-888-364-4232
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Kade Sullivan via Af <af@afmug.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Do you guys find that the packetflux gear has a high survival rate up
>>> there?  We have a site that needs converted to DC and recabled, and are
>>> considering this route.  Our thinking is, why put the dc box at the bottom
>>> when we can just put the thing up at the top and run nothing down to the
>>> bottom except power.  All our backhauls are half way up the tower, no
>>> reason to even have anything at the bottom except the UPS.
>>>
>>>  What type of fiber are you guys using for attaching to the tower?  We
>>> will need to run a fiber from 1 level to another on the tower to feed the
>>> backhauls to the APs, and are unsure which type fiber cable to look at.
>>> Should we use armored fiber and just ground the jacket to the tower on each
>>> end, or do we want fiber with no metal jacket so that it's not conductive?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Gerard Dupont III via Af <af@afmug.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Our Top boxes usually contain the following.
>>>>
>>>>  1x Sitemonitor
>>>> 2x GigabitSyncInjectors
>>>> 1x Citel DS210-48DC
>>>> 2x Traco TCL 060-124 DC Down Convertors -
>>>> http://www.tracopower.com/products/tcl-dc.pdf
>>>> 1x RB2011
>>>> 2x APC PRM4 Surge Chasis
>>>> 8x GigEAPC-HV
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Gerard
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Chuck Hogg via Af <af@afmug.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We use this, and solder two legs together.  We send 48v DC up to the
>>>>> top and downconvert.  I think we've gone about 450' with this 
>>>>> configuration
>>>>> (including up the tower and along the cable raceway to the inside of a
>>>>> building)  However, that's primarily why we send 48v up and downconvert,
>>>>> because of the voltage loss.  Gives very clean 24v power to the equipment.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.amazon.com/Cable-Portable-Power-Gauge-Conductor/dp/B0076ZT4C2
>>>>>
>>>>>  It would probably be better for me to take a picture of one of our
>>>>> boxes.  We are continually building them as we continue our wireless
>>>>> upgrades.
>>>>>
>>>>>  I don't remember if Gerard resub'd to this list after it moved, but
>>>>> he's the engineer behind the box.  He can give you parts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Chuck
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Tyson Burris @ Internet Comm. Inc
>>>>> via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>  Chuck,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Are you doing any 8-10 gauge runs exceeding 500' ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  I can't seem to find what I need
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sep 28, 2014, at 9:50 AM, Chuck Hogg via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   We do power and fiber up the tower as our standard...ever since
>>>>>> that standard has been used, I don't think we've lost a site yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Chuck
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Matt via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is what we have used for all our CMM units for years.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.outdoorspeakerdepot.com/14ga2inspca5.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Outdoor, UV resistant, etc.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Gino Villarini via Af <af@afmug.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> > Planning on hanging a DC box on the tower
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > 30-40w total power
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Cat5 using multiple pairs or 2 conductor cable?
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > We are inclined on cat 5 for standardization purposes...
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Sent from Marconi's and Graham Bell's fused thoughts!!!
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to