Isn't the 2ms without sync?

________________________________
From: Af [af-boun...@afmug.com] on behalf of Josh Luthman via Af [af@afmug.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 7:04 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force


2ms check again

http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/spec-sheets/epmp_force110_ptp_specs/epmp_force110_ptp_specs-2

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Nov 19, 2014 7:59 PM, "Matt via Af" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> 
wrote:
> The ptp, yes.

Oops, I forgot to include ePMP PTP Force 110 in my question.  Anyone
got there hands on them yet?  Spec sheet says 17ms latency with GPS
enabled in PTP.  Was really hoping for less then that.



>> > Exactly, the force110 based PTP does not include GPS sync
>> >
>>
>> The Force 110 PTP PDF spec sheet states GPS sync.
>>
>> >
>> > The same as any another SM?  It's just a connectorized radio with 25db
>> > dish.
>> >
>>
>> >> Anyone got there hands on an ePMP Force yet?  Curious on actual
>> >> latency and throughput with GPS enabled.

Reply via email to