It'll sync with other force 110 ptp radios. You'd have to replace all your MTs for sync to factor in. Or just unsync and get more bandwidth.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Nov 22, 2014 12:31 PM, "Paul McCall via Af" <af@afmug.com> wrote: > For Cambium.... we have a very remote tower that feeds several other > towers. Everything is OSPF but logically... > > Tower R (the main remote tower - a 190 ft. Rohn 25G with several > anti-twist devices) is "fed" by... > Tower A - 26 miles away - UBNT 3.65ghz Rocket M5 AND a Mikrotik > RB912 5 Ghz > This commercial tower (Tower A) has over 300Mbit of usable > bandwidth and feeds about 75 to 85 Mbit to Tower A > Tower B - 9 miles away - UBNT 5ghz Rocket M5 > This tower (Tower B) is a 90 ft. Rohn 25G > > Tower R then feeds... > Tower C - 12 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 50 Mbit of > usable bandwidth. (Rohn 25G 120 ft.) > Tower D - 15 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 40 Mbit of > usable bandwidth. (Rohn 25G 120 ft.) > Tower E - 17 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 40 Mbit of > usable bandwidth. (Rohn 25G 120 ft.) > Tower F - 14 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 40 Mbit of > usable bandwidth. (Rohn 25G 120 ft.) > > To get all this to work without Sync was quite a frequency juggling act. > There are other towers in the area and towers C, D, E, F connect (chain) to > each other on the "back side" and we use a couple 3.65Ghz UBNT radios on > the backside links. > > The challenge... > > First of all, I need more BW to each tower, but mostly Tower C. And, I > need better consistency... at times the links do not perform as I expect > and then I get customer complaints etc. I hate that. > > So, what would be the best solution that Cambium can recommend other than > a ton of licensed links? Obviously, the gear I am using now is inexpensive. > > The PTP110 solution ... 2ms unsynced.... can it sync, now or tomorrow? > Latency with sync? > > Paul > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt via Af > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 11:47 AM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force > > > Hi, > > > > Please allow me to clarify. > > > > The Force 110 uses the Connectorized UnSync'd unit with the two 10/100 > FE ports. > > > > The Force 110 PTP uses the Connectorized GPS Sync'd unit with the > > single GigE port that supports 802.3af PoE in addition to proprietary > PoE. GPS capabilities will be disabled (but the radio can still use the on > board GPS chip to track satellites and provide coordinates). > > > > The 2ms latency is achieved purely through software changes in Release > 2.4 and will apply to both products. > > Reading this spec sheet. > > > http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/files/PRODUCTS/ePMP/FORCE/Force%20110%20PTP_Oct2014.pdf > > >>>LATENCY (nominal, one way) < 2 ms (PTP Mode), 6 ms (Flexible Frame > >>>Mode) , 17 ms (GPS Sync Mode) >
