To syn you need to use APs on the master side, latency will jump to 20ms avgŠ. Just use ptp450¹s!
Gino A. Villarini President Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. www.aeronetpr.com @aeronetpr On 11/22/14, 1:31 PM, "Paul McCall via Af" <af@afmug.com> wrote: >For Cambium.... we have a very remote tower that feeds several other >towers. Everything is OSPF but logically... > >Tower R (the main remote tower - a 190 ft. Rohn 25G with several >anti-twist devices) is "fed" by... > Tower A - 26 miles away - UBNT 3.65ghz Rocket M5 AND a Mikrotik RB912 5 >Ghz > This commercial tower (Tower A) has over 300Mbit of usable > bandwidth >and feeds about 75 to 85 Mbit to Tower A > Tower B - 9 miles away - UBNT 5ghz Rocket M5 > This tower (Tower B) is a 90 ft. Rohn 25G > >Tower R then feeds... > Tower C - 12 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 50 Mbit of usable >bandwidth. (Rohn 25G 120 ft.) > Tower D - 15 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 40 Mbit of usable >bandwidth. (Rohn 25G 120 ft.) > Tower E - 17 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 40 Mbit of usable >bandwidth. (Rohn 25G 120 ft.) > Tower F - 14 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 40 Mbit of usable >bandwidth. (Rohn 25G 120 ft.) > >To get all this to work without Sync was quite a frequency juggling act. >There are other towers in the area and towers C, D, E, F connect (chain) >to each other on the "back side" and we use a couple 3.65Ghz UBNT radios >on the backside links. > >The challenge... > >First of all, I need more BW to each tower, but mostly Tower C. And, I >need better consistency... at times the links do not perform as I expect >and then I get customer complaints etc. I hate that. > >So, what would be the best solution that Cambium can recommend other than >a ton of licensed links? Obviously, the gear I am using now is >inexpensive. > >The PTP110 solution ... 2ms unsynced.... can it sync, now or tomorrow? > Latency with sync? > >Paul > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt via Af >Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 11:47 AM >To: af@afmug.com >Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force > >> Hi, >> >> Please allow me to clarify. >> >> The Force 110 uses the Connectorized UnSync'd unit with the two 10/100 >>FE ports. >> >> The Force 110 PTP uses the Connectorized GPS Sync'd unit with the >> single GigE port that supports 802.3af PoE in addition to proprietary >>PoE. GPS capabilities will be disabled (but the radio can still use the >>on board GPS chip to track satellites and provide coordinates). >> >> The 2ms latency is achieved purely through software changes in Release >>2.4 and will apply to both products. > >Reading this spec sheet. > >http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/files/PRODUCTS/ePMP/FORCE/Force%20110%20PTP >_Oct2014.pdf > >>>>LATENCY (nominal, one way) < 2 ms (PTP Mode), 6 ms (Flexible Frame >>>>Mode) , 17 ms (GPS Sync Mode)
