17ms can be done now though, that would be lame. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Nov 19, 2014 8:29 PM, "Mathew Howard via Af" <af@afmug.com> wrote:
> Isn't the 2ms without sync? > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Af [af-boun...@afmug.com] on behalf of Josh Luthman via Af [ > af@afmug.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, November 19, 2014 7:04 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force > > 2ms check again > > > http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/spec-sheets/epmp_force110_ptp_specs/epmp_force110_ptp_specs-2 > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Nov 19, 2014 7:59 PM, "Matt via Af" <af@afmug.com> wrote: > >> > The ptp, yes. >> >> Oops, I forgot to include ePMP PTP Force 110 in my question. Anyone >> got there hands on them yet? Spec sheet says 17ms latency with GPS >> enabled in PTP. Was really hoping for less then that. >> >> >> >> >> > Exactly, the force110 based PTP does not include GPS sync >> >> > >> >> >> >> The Force 110 PTP PDF spec sheet states GPS sync. >> >> >> >> > >> >> > The same as any another SM? It's just a connectorized radio with >> 25db >> >> > dish. >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> Anyone got there hands on an ePMP Force yet? Curious on actual >> >> >> latency and throughput with GPS enabled. >> >
