I really can’t say what was in the minds of the JAB decision makers. Seems like they were trying to hoover up as many customers as possible with the least effort and outlay.
From: Josh Luthman via Af Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 2:54 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Network Monitoring in the 2010's So you're saying definitely not based on customer service... Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Nov 20, 2014 4:49 PM, "Chuck McCown via Af" <[email protected]> wrote: Pretty sure it was based on revenue stream and the quality of the network. Canopy based systems got more than Trango or UBNT etc. From: Josh Luthman via Af Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 2:45 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Network Monitoring in the 2010's I have to think the company was worth more because of location. I doubt JAB could care less what the quality of tech support was. Another WISP in Utah was another drop in the bucket. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Nov 20, 2014 4:42 PM, "Chuck McCown via Af" <[email protected]> wrote: The day is coming when that statement can be verified... ;-) -----Original Message----- From: Travis Johnson via Af Microserv. You remember, the company that was 10x larger than yours and sold to JAB for more, per sub, than any other company so far. :)
