dmca if you download it, but everything out there is streamable, with the
exception of atlas shrugged iii i havent found anything not streaming in
decent quality

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Josh Luthman via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:

> All I know is whatever these companies are doing is definitely working.  I
> can't find a single movie to pirate online.  Definitely can't find mp4
> videos of Bluray rips that are a roughly 2 GBs and work with my
> Chromecast/Xbox/TV.
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Chuck Hogg via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:
>
>> Some variation of FRAPS if I remember correctly..
>>
>> Regards,
>> Chuck
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Chris Wright via Af <af@afmug.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> It isn’t. I fondly recall the first pirated blu-ray discs (before the
>>> encryption keys were leaked) were copied by script kiddies who had the
>>> playback computer pause and print-screen the video frame-by-frame.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Chris Wright
>>>
>>> Velociter Wireless <http://www.velociter.net/>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Nate Burke via
>>> Af
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 8:35 PM
>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Well there goes all our bandwidth. Amazon
>>> streaming 4K now.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I've always thought that all this hype of digital encryption and copy
>>> protection was a little lacking.  Ultimately it's still an analog medium
>>> (you viewing the picture) so it could always be 'copied' at that level.
>>> Interpret the signal passed to the actual LCD Panel, "Pixel 1342x975
>>> displaying color E0FFFF at timestamp 58:44:13.221"  Maybe I'm naive, but it
>>> doesn't seem like it should be that hard.....
>>>
>>> On 12/9/2014 10:18 PM, Jason McKemie via Af wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd think if someone could figure out a way to get the movies from RAM,
>>> they could also figure out a way to capture them from a stream.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Travis Johnson via Af <af@afmug.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Because then people could "save" the movies in RAM, and someone would
>>> figure out a way to be able to download them and put them on the Internet
>>> for free.
>>>
>>> It's a licensing issue... that's why "streaming" is OK.
>>>
>>> Travis
>>>
>>> On 12/9/2014 7:00 PM, Bill Prince via Af wrote:
>>>
>>> That 187MB translates to only about 11.25 GB per hour.  Why not stick in
>>> a 32GB memory and be done?  That would be almost 3 hours of buffer.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> bp
>>>
>>> <part {dash} 15 {at} SkylineBroadbandService {dot} com>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/9/2014 4:50 PM, Travis Johnson via Af wrote:
>>>
>>> It's really too bad that the devices that support all these streaming
>>> services can't have a larger buffer. I'm sure it's part of their licensing
>>> deals, but if they could buffer 60 seconds of stream (at any quality), they
>>> would have much fewer support calls for streaming issues, etc.
>>>
>>> Using Netflix's 25Mbps for 4k, that works out to 187.5MB of storage
>>> space. At current RAM prices, you can buy a 256MB module for $15 full
>>> retail... so places like Samsung can probably buy them in quantity for less
>>> than $2. Seems like it would be worth it to pay an extra $10 for a
>>> TV/DVD/PS4/Wii-U device that could handle 60 seconds of video.
>>>
>>> Travis
>>>
>>> On 12/9/2014 5:34 PM, Sterling Jacobson via Af wrote:
>>>
>>> That’s pretty cool.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You can do 4k direct from Youtube.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Several of the ones I’ve tested are sustained around 20-30Mbps.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> But on my network it tends to burst to 90Mbps then sit around for a
>>> while, then burst back to 90Mbps.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I think the 4k will require a lot of optimizations before it works on
>>> the built in TV’s.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Jerry Richardson via Af
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 5:12 PM
>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Well there goes all our bandwidth. Amazon
>>> streaming 4K now.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Lovely
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Ryan Ghering via Af
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 3:38 PM
>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Well there goes all our bandwidth. Amazon streaming
>>> 4K now.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.cnet.com/news/amazon-starts-4k-uhd-streams/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Ryan Ghering
>>> Network Operations - Plains.Net
>>> Office: 970-848-0475 - Cell: 970-630-1879
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>


-- 
All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925

Reply via email to