I'm sure they'll do a 24ghz AF 2/Duo/Super/Ultra with 1024QAM. In the 100mhz channels both ways that'll allow around 1280mbit FD - so a 2.5gbit backhaul... I'm assuming 3.65 will come as well.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Josh Reynolds via Af <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd guess there's going to be... a least 3 AirFiber products released in > the next 12-18 months. > > If not sooner. > > Now... what would those be? > > Hrmmmmmmmmm..... > > josh reynolds :: chief information officer > spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com > > On 12/10/2014 08:07 PM, Rory Conaway via Af wrote: > > I don’t know what you are talking about. > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Josh Reynolds via Af > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 10, 2014 10:05 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. > > > > I'm sure that AirFiber team (which they seem to keep expanding) is > silently sitting in their own little corner in Chicago doing nothing. > > :P > > josh reynolds :: chief information officer > > spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com > > On 12/10/2014 07:48 PM, Rory Conaway via Af wrote: > > I think the ePMP is going to run into the same problem all the 802.11ac > vendors are seeing with the new OOBE rules. The 450 is able to provide a > better performance within the new environment so there will still be a > differentiator. The only question if it’s worth the difference. > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Stefan Englhardt via Af > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:45 PM > *To:* Josh Luthman via Af > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. > > > > .AC is an upgrade to .N. Cambium has the choice to use it or not. Others > do. epmp competes with 450 right now but helps to keep customers and > applications where 450 does not meet the price point. > > > > *Von:* Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected]> > *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 11. Dezember 2014 04:00 > *An:* Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected]> > > > > An .AC ePMP would be incredible - but the issue is whether Cambium would be > fearful of it competing too much with the 450. What does a company do when > it has 2 products that are too good, and the cheaper one starts to outshine > the more expensive one in the most often used benchmark? (mbps - even .AC > ePMP is unlikely to beat 450 in scalability / latency / etc). > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Stefan Englhardt via Af <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > The answer is to release an epmp1000-ac. > > > > > > *Von:* Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected]> > > *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 11. Dezember 2014 01:39 > > *An:* Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected]> > > > > I hope Cambium is listing on this point. > > > > Get rid of speed license and make it as unlimited radios at 10 meg price > > point. > > > > They are about to have more competition from lot of other vendors too. > > > > Tushar > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] On Behalf > Of Peter Kranz via Af > > Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 3:10 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. > > > > > Yes no maybe. > > > > I think this is good news actually, as it is sure to light the > competitive > > fire under Cambium to get to feature parity and get rid of speed > licenses. > > > > > > > > >
