I'd be incredibly surprised if they didn't do a ptmp.

Not sure a revamped 24GHz is in consideration when there's so many other bands they could release equipment for.

Maybe licensed? Hrmmmm...

One can hope, right?

josh reynolds :: chief information officer
spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com

On 12/10/2014 08:19 PM, Colin Stanners via Af wrote:
I'm sure they'll do a 24ghz AF 2/Duo/Super/Ultra with 1024QAM. In the 100mhz channels both ways that'll allow around 1280mbit FD - so a 2.5gbit backhaul... I'm assuming 3.65 will come as well.

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Josh Reynolds via Af <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I'd guess there's going to be... a least3 AirFiber products
    released in the next 12-18 months.

    If not sooner.

    Now... what would those be?

    Hrmmmmmmmmm.....

    josh reynolds :: chief information officer
    spitwspots ::www.spitwspots.com  <http://www.spitwspots.com>

    On 12/10/2014 08:07 PM, Rory Conaway via Af wrote:

    I don’t know what you are talking about.

    Rory

    *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Josh
    Reynolds via Af
    *Sent:* Wednesday, December 10, 2014 10:05 PM
    *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted..

    I'm sure that AirFiber team (which they seem to keep expanding)
    is silently sitting in their own little corner in Chicago doing
    nothing.

    :P

    josh reynolds :: chief information officer
    spitwspots ::www.spitwspots.com  <http://www.spitwspots.com>

    On 12/10/2014 07:48 PM, Rory Conaway via Af wrote:

        I think the ePMP is going to run into the same problem all
        the 802.11ac vendors are seeing with the new OOBE rules.  The
        450 is able to provide a better performance within the new
        environment so there will still be a differentiator.  The
        only question if it’s worth the difference.

        Rory

        *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Stefan
        Englhardt via Af
        *Sent:* Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:45 PM
        *To:* Josh Luthman via Af
        *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted..

        .AC is an upgrade to .N. Cambium has the choice to use it or
        not. Others do. epmp competes with 450 right now but helps to
        keep customers and applications where 450 does not meet the
        price point.

        *Von:*Josh Luthman via Af <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Gesendet:* ‎Donnerstag‎, ‎11‎. ‎Dezember‎ ‎2014 ‎04‎:‎00
        *An:* Josh Luthman via Af <mailto:[email protected]>

        An .AC ePMP would be incredible - but the issue is whether
        Cambium would be
        fearful of it competing too much with the 450. What does a
        company do when
        it has 2 products that are too good, and the cheaper one
        starts to outshine
        the more expensive one in the most often used benchmark?
        (mbps - even .AC
        ePMP is unlikely to beat 450 in scalability / latency / etc).

        On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Stefan Englhardt via Af
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
        wrote:

        >  The answer is to release an epmp1000-ac.
        >
        >
        > *Von:* Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
        > *Gesendet:* ‎Donnerstag‎, ‎11‎. ‎Dezember‎ ‎2014 ‎01‎:‎39
        > *An:* Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
        >
        > I hope Cambium is listing on this point.
        >
        > Get rid of speed license and make it as unlimited radios at
        10 meg price
        > point.
        >
        > They are about to have more competition from lot of other
        vendors too.
        >
        > Tushar
        >
        > -----Original Message-----
        > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter
        Kranz via Af
        > Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 3:10 PM
        > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted..
        >
        > > Yes no maybe.
        >
        > I think this is good news actually, as it is sure to light
        the competitive
        > fire under Cambium to get to feature parity and get rid of
        speed licenses.
        >
        >




Reply via email to