yes, with the maintenance contract you can get as detailed as you want without you can only do the source/dest IP/port but not identification of the traffic type If you have it at a POP just create a policy (in and out) specific to the monitored customer and make sure those policies are logging all traffic. I believe the 60 series does not have internal storage, the higher series do. but you can send to syslog and one of the open source ones, i dont recall which, has fortigate specific reporting
Its pretty slick, especially for office environments, the generic cloud reporting keeps customers happy On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Wireless Admin via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: > Does FortiOS provide detailed report on Internet usage? Sorry > for the question but I don’t have any experience with this system. > > > > Steve B. > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy via > Af > *Sent:* Friday, December 26, 2014 2:04 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Customer - Detailed Usage Report > > > > we are looking at putting 60d and 90d in as our site/POP routers. It will > give us more visibility on the network. It does require a service contract > for advanced features and reporting. There are a couple syslog servers I > guess that can format the reports on these > > > > On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 1:00 PM, That One Guy <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > http://www.avfirewalls.com/?gclid=Cj0KEQiAq_SkBRC3jLvJ1IPt2eIBEiQASUZy1z9JetUR94rPQ3lbbwki727bo9hzSXDX33upLwc2LkEaAiBm8P8HAQ > > > > On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Wireless Admin via Af <af@afmug.com> > wrote: > > Is there a low end unit that can do this? Any Idea what price range? > > > > Steve B > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy via > Af > *Sent:* Friday, December 26, 2014 12:37 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Customer - Detailed Usage Report > > > > A Fortigate will do that. you can even cobble it down to showing what user > is logged in and what theyre doing > > > > On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Ken Hohhof via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: > > You could put in one of the Mikrotik routers that have the LCD and lock it > to displaying the WAN side bandwidth graph. It won’t tell them what is > using all the bandwidth, but they can certainly go around shutting stuff > off to see what is causing the usage. Like oh, it went down when I shut > off the satellite TV receiver, I didn’t know that used the Internet. Or > look, it goes up whenever my daughter uses Facetime, that uses the > Internet? Or we all clicked to upgrade our iOS versions and the graph has > been pegged for the last day, meanwhile my Xbox games are lagging. > > > > *From:* Josh Luthman via Af <af@afmug.com> > > *Sent:* Friday, December 26, 2014 11:29 AM > > *To:* af@afmug.com > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Customer - Detailed Usage Report > > > > Powercode does bits down to the minute. > > If you want more detailed you'll probably need ntop or Procera. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Dec 26, 2014 12:01 PM, "Wireless Admin via Af" <af@afmug.com> wrote: > > Can anyone suggest a system that would allow an ISP to provide a customer > a detailed report on Internet usage. I’m talking about the ability to show > a customer, on usage based billing, what caused the consumption. My > thought would be to route the customers IP through a specialized process > for a limited period of time so details could be collected. A sort of > debug mode. > > > > Steve B > > > > > > > > -- > > All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the > parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you > can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not > use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 > > > > > > -- > > All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the > parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you > can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not > use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 > > > > > > -- > > All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the > parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you > can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not > use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 > -- All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
