Maybe but considering it's the first one I've purchased but doesn't make me very excited about it
Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 23, 2015, at 12:46, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote: > > DOA maybe? > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > >> On Jan 23, 2015 1:43 PM, "Craig House" <[email protected]> wrote: >> Couldn't get it to stay connected long enough to run one tried running a >> speed test a couple of times and it would vary anywhere from two mag to 30 >> meg before it would drop >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Jan 23, 2015, at 12:41, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Did you ever do a link test with epmp? >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>>> On Jan 23, 2015 1:15 PM, "Craig House" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Ok so I go to the tower today replace the Epmp AP with a Rocket M2 on the >>>> same antenna (Dual slant) and test with a Nano M2 at the same place I >>>> tested yesterday. I get -44 signal 95% Quality and 96% capacity and >>>> speedtests as pictured. What is the problem with the EPMP equipment. So >>>> far I am not impressed. IF the EPMP thinks the noise floor is -60 ish and >>>> a UBNT has no problem getting great thoughput I guess we will stick with >>>> the UBNT >>>> >>>> From: "Craig House" <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 6:25:52 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee >>>> >>>> Ok so as an experiment I moved my 2.4 FSK omni to the same channel that >>>> this EPMP sector was on at the same height on the same tower. All 41 >>>> customers reconnected to the fsk omni and all link tests are in the upper >>>> 95% and better on all customers >>>> So why would this spectrum be so dirty for the 90 degree EPMP sector but >>>> usable and great link tests for the FSK omni at the same height.? >>>> >>>> From: "Craig House" <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 8:24:27 PM >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee >>>> >>>> Cant use 5Ghz All my BH links are in 5ghz and I cant get though trees >>>> with 5ghz. 90% of my customer base is behind trees. This is not the >>>> tower I plan on leaving it on. But I dont understand why the noise floor >>>> would be that high here. It is 3 miles from any town and sits in the >>>> middle of nothing. Cow pastures all around. Unless the cows are carrying >>>> wireless routers?? >>>> >>>> From: "John Woodfield" <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 8:12:39 PM >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee >>>> >>>> I would suggest 5ghz. Thats is stupid high for 2.4... >>>> John Woodfield Delmarva WiFi http://www.delmarvawifi.com cell (410) >>>> 708-1937 >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: "Craig House" <[email protected]> >>>> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 9:07pm >>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Yes I'm using a 90° sector and that AP is 180 feet up >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> On Jan 22, 2015, at 19:28, John Woodfield <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> That noise floor is horrible. I usually don't see it that bad even at 200' >>>> in the air. Are you using a sector? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> John Woodfield Delmarva WiFi http://www.delmarvawifi.com cell (410) >>>> 708-1937 >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: "Craig House" <[email protected]> >>>> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 7:59pm >>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Yes sorry. Capacity is bad. Quality is good >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> On Jan 22, 2015, at 18:57, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Quality? >>>> On Jan 22, 2015 7:39 PM, "Craig House" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Ok done. I have a -56 signal at the SM attached is a screenshot of the >>>>> analysis. -75 around the channel that I am on with the apj >>>>> So that is not the problem. Why would I have only 15% to 40% uplink >>>>> capacity when I have 95-100% capacity and a -56 signal >>>>> From: "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 6:20:07 PM >>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee >>>>> Have Java installed, run that program. Connect to that radio. >>>>> >>>>> ----- >>>>> Mike Hammett >>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> From: "Craig House" <[email protected]> >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 5:55:54 PM >>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee >>>>> So I switch the AP to Spectrum analyzer mode and reboot. Got to the spec >>>>> analyzer tab and click download tool. How do I use it. It is a separate >>>>> utility that my laptop doesn't know how to use the file? >>>>> From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 5:39:34 PM >>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee >>>>> Monitor wireless might have a scan what you're after. I think that's >>>>> only compatible (ie TDD OR wifi not both) networks seen. >>>>> Uplink issue, noise and all that basic rf stuff? >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>> On Jan 22, 2015 6:07 PM, "Craig House" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> I've been using cambium/Motorola FSK products now for 10 years but the >>>>>> EPMP product has a few things that I can't quite get to work >>>>>> The main one that concerns me is that I'm using an integrated SM and at >>>>>> any distance from the tower I can make it connect as long as I know the >>>>>> SSID. But what is the trick to making it show available SS IDs to >>>>>> connect to sort of like the scan available access points feature in >>>>>> ubiquity? >>>>>> >>>>>> The second question is that even a very close distances and was very >>>>>> good signals like -53 I have difficulty getting good uplink capacity the >>>>>> quality seems to be reasonable 90% or above but the capacity varies from >>>>>> 15% to 45% most of the time and it's obvious in the speed test that the >>>>>> uplink is not doing what it should >>>>>> What am I doing wrong photo is attached of what I'm talking about in the >>>>>> second question >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>
