3 feet apart you may have blown the radios.  Did you have antennas hooked
up?

I think once it gets hit with -10 it would have caused damage, I don't
think it matters the duration.  Could be wrong.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Craig House <cr...@totalhighspeed.net>
wrote:

> I got them to link up on my living room floor before I took them to the
> tower same as those the signal was pretty good there but I was also 3 feet
> from it
> I remember pulling the plug pretty quick when I saw them link up because I
> was worried about how hot the link was
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 23, 2015, at 13:05, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
> wrote:
>
> Did you test it in a lab first?
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Craig House <cr...@totalhighspeed.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Maybe but considering it's the first one I've purchased but doesn't make
>> me very excited about it
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Jan 23, 2015, at 12:46, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> DOA maybe?
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>> On Jan 23, 2015 1:43 PM, "Craig House" <cr...@totalhighspeed.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Couldn't get it to stay connected long enough to run one tried running a
>>> speed test a couple of times and it would vary anywhere from two mag to 30
>>> meg before it would drop
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Jan 23, 2015, at 12:41, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Did you ever do a link test with epmp?
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>> On Jan 23, 2015 1:15 PM, "Craig House" <cr...@totalhighspeed.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ok so I go to the tower today replace the Epmp AP with a  Rocket M2 on
>>>> the same antenna (Dual slant) and test with a Nano M2 at the same place I
>>>> tested yesterday.  I get -44 signal 95% Quality and 96% capacity and
>>>> speedtests as pictured.  What is the problem with the EPMP equipment.  So
>>>> far I am not impressed.  IF the EPMP thinks the noise floor is -60 ish and
>>>> a UBNT has no problem getting great thoughput I guess we will stick with
>>>> the UBNT
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> *From: *"Craig House" <cr...@totalhighspeed.net>
>>>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>>>> *Sent: *Friday, January 23, 2015 6:25:52 AM
>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee
>>>>
>>>> Ok  so as an experiment I moved my 2.4 FSK omni to the same channel
>>>> that this EPMP sector was on at the same height on the same tower.  All 41
>>>> customers reconnected to the fsk omni and all link tests are in the upper
>>>> 95% and better on all customers
>>>> So why would this spectrum be so dirty for the 90 degree EPMP sector
>>>> but usable and great link tests for the FSK omni  at the same height.?
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> *From: *"Craig House" <cr...@totalhighspeed.net>
>>>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>>>> *Sent: *Thursday, January 22, 2015 8:24:27 PM
>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee
>>>>
>>>> Cant use 5Ghz  All my BH links are in 5ghz and I cant get though trees
>>>> with 5ghz.  90% of my customer base is behind trees.  This is not the tower
>>>> I plan on leaving it on.  But I dont understand why the noise floor would
>>>> be that high here.  It is 3 miles from any town and sits in the middle of
>>>> nothing.  Cow pastures all around.  Unless the cows are carrying wireless
>>>> routers??
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> *From: *"John Woodfield" <john.woodfi...@jwcn.biz>
>>>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>>>> *Sent: *Thursday, January 22, 2015 8:12:39 PM
>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee
>>>>
>>>> I would suggest 5ghz. Thats is stupid high for 2.4...
>>>>
>>>> John Woodfield Delmarva WiFi http://www.delmarvawifi.com cell (410)
>>>> 708-1937
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: "Craig House" <cr...@totalhighspeed.net>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 9:07pm
>>>> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes I'm using a 90° sector and that AP is 180 feet up
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 22, 2015, at 19:28, John Woodfield <john.woodfi...@jwcn.biz>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> That noise floor is horrible. I usually don't see it that bad even at
>>>> 200' in the air. Are you using a sector?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> John Woodfield Delmarva WiFi http://www.delmarvawifi.com cell (410)
>>>> 708-1937
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: "Craig House" <cr...@totalhighspeed.net>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 7:59pm
>>>> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes sorry.  Capacity is bad. Quality is good
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 22, 2015, at 18:57, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Quality?
>>>> On Jan 22, 2015 7:39 PM, "Craig House" <cr...@totalhighspeed.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ok  done.  I have a -56 signal at the SM attached is a screenshot of
>>>>> the analysis.  -75 around the channel that I am on with the apj
>>>>> So that is not the problem.  Why would I have only 15% to 40% uplink
>>>>> capacity when I have 95-100% capacity and a -56 signal
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> *From: *"Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net>
>>>>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>>>>> *Sent: *Thursday, January 22, 2015 6:20:07 PM
>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee
>>>>> Have Java installed, run that program. Connect to that radio.
>>>>>
>>>>> -----
>>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> *From: *"Craig House" <cr...@totalhighspeed.net>
>>>>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>>>>> *Sent: *Thursday, January 22, 2015 5:55:54 PM
>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee
>>>>> So I switch the AP to Spectrum analyzer mode and reboot. Got to the
>>>>> spec analyzer tab and click download tool.  How do I use it.  It is a
>>>>> separate utility that my laptop doesn't know how to use the file?
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> *From: *"Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
>>>>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>>>>> *Sent: *Thursday, January 22, 2015 5:39:34 PM
>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee
>>>>>
>>>>> Monitor wireless might have a scan what you're after.  I think that's
>>>>> only compatible (ie TDD OR wifi not both) networks seen.
>>>>>
>>>>> Uplink issue, noise and all that basic rf stuff?
>>>>>
>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>> On Jan 22, 2015 6:07 PM, "Craig House" <cr...@totalhighspeed.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I've been using cambium/Motorola FSK products now for 10 years but
>>>>>> the EPMP product has a few things that I can't quite get to work
>>>>>> The main one that concerns me is that I'm using an integrated SM and
>>>>>> at any distance from the tower I can make it connect as long as I know 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> SSID. But what is the trick to making it show available SS IDs to connect
>>>>>> to sort of like the scan available access points feature in ubiquity?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The second question is that even a very close distances and was very
>>>>>> good signals like -53 I have difficulty getting good uplink capacity the
>>>>>> quality seems to be reasonable 90% or above but the capacity varies from
>>>>>> 15% to 45% most of the time and it's obvious in the speed test that the
>>>>>> uplink is not doing what it should
>>>>>> What am I doing wrong photo is attached of what I'm talking about in
>>>>>> the second question
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>

Reply via email to